Literature DB >> 20182813

Views of primary care physicians and oncologists on cancer follow-up initiatives in primary care: an online survey.

Eila K Watson1, Elaine M Sugden, Peter W Rose.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Primary care physicians (PCPs) are playing an increasing role in the follow-up of cancer in England. In 2003 a Cancer Care Review (CCR) was introduced to ensure contact between PCPs and cancer patients within 6 months of diagnosis. The NHS also intends to introduce survivorship care plans (SCP). The aims of this study were to: describe current practice and views in primary care with respect to the CCR and information provision from secondary to primary care following final discharge from hospital follow-up; and to seek views on the perceived usefulness, content, and feasibility of a SCP.
METHODS: An on-line questionnaire survey of 100 oncologists and 200 PCPs.
RESULTS: Half of PCPs undertook the CCR opportunistically, and only 64% had an agreed structure. Forty percent felt the CCR was useful for the doctor, and 60% useful for the patient. Most PCPs and oncologists think a SCP would be useful, but only 40% oncologists thought that it would be easy to produce. At discharge from follow-up, more than half of oncologists said they provided information on histology, treatment, requirements for screening and surveillance, and referral guidance. Less than half provide information on potential late effects and symptoms of recurrence. PCPs felt that information on all of these areas was important and that the information they receive is often inadequate. DISCUSSION/
CONCLUSIONS: The CCR has not been implemented systematically. There is support for the introduction of a SCP and broad agreement on content. However, careful planning is needed to ensure all necessary information is included and to overcome barriers of implementation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Further research should explore what cancer survivors would find useful in a primary care-based CCR and what should be included in a SCP. This should be clearly communicated to the relevant health care professionals to maximise the benefits cancer survivors and their families gain from these policy initiatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20182813     DOI: 10.1007/s11764-010-0117-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Surviv        ISSN: 1932-2259            Impact factor:   4.442


  9 in total

1.  The role of the general practitioner in cancer care and the effect of an extended information routine.

Authors:  B Johansson; G Berglund; K Hoffman; B Glimelius; P O Sjöden
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 2.  Patients' and healthcare professionals' views of cancer follow-up: systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth A Lewis; Richard D Neal; Maggie Hendry; Barbara France; Nefyn H Williams; Daphne Russell; Dyfrig A Hughes; Ian Russell; Nicholas S A Stuart; David Weller; Clare Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Follow-up of cancer in primary care versus secondary care: systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth A Lewis; Richard D Neal; Nefyn H Williams; Barbara France; Maggie Hendry; Daphne Russell; Dyfrig A Hughes; Ian Russell; Nicholas S A Stuart; David Weller; Clare Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Primary care physicians' views of routine follow-up care of cancer survivors.

Authors:  M Elisabeth Del Giudice; Eva Grunfeld; Bart J Harvey; Eugenia Piliotis; Sunil Verma
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Tailored chemotherapy information faxed to general practitioners improves confidence in managing adverse effects and satisfaction with shared care: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael Jefford; Carl Baravelli; Paul Dudgeon; Adrian Dabscheck; Melanie Evans; Michael Moloney; Penelope Schofield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Perspectives on post-treatment cancer care: qualitative research with survivors, nurses, and physicians.

Authors:  Maria E Hewitt; Annette Bamundo; Rebecca Day; Catherine Harvey
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Comparisons of patient and physician expectations for cancer survivorship care.

Authors:  Winson Y Cheung; Bridget A Neville; Danielle B Cameron; E Francis Cook; Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The views of bowel cancer survivors and health care professionals regarding survivorship care plans and post treatment follow up.

Authors:  Carl Baravelli; Meinir Krishnasamy; Carmel Pezaro; Penelope Schofield; Kerryann Lotfi-Jam; Megan Rogers; Donna Milne; Sanchia Aranda; Dorothy King; Beryl Shaw; Suzi Grogan; Michael Jefford
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 4.442

9.  Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial.

Authors:  Kinta Beaver; Debbie Tysver-Robinson; Malcolm Campbell; Mary Twomey; Susan Williamson; Andrew Hindley; Shabbir Susnerwala; Graham Dunn; Karen Luker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-01-14
  9 in total
  30 in total

1.  Implementing survivorship care plans for colon cancer survivors

Authors:  Deborah K Mayer; Adrian Gerstel; Annmarie Lee Walton; Tammy Triglianos; Teresa E Sadiq; Nikki A Hawkins; Janine M Davies
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 2.  Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  Dori L Klemanski; Kristine K Browning; Jennifer Kue
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Evaluating primary care providers' views on survivorship care plans generated by an electronic health record system.

Authors:  SarahMaria Donohue; Mary E Sesto; David L Hahn; Kevin A Buhr; Elizabeth A Jacobs; James M Sosman; Molly J Andreason; Douglas A Wiegmann; Amye J Tevaarwerk
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Oncologists' Perspectives of Their Roles and Responsibilities During Multi-disciplinary Breast Cancer Follow-Up.

Authors:  Heather B Neuman; Nicole M Steffens; Nora Jacobson; Amye Tevaarwerk; Bethany Anderson; Lee G Wilke; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Do survivorship care plans make a difference? A primary care provider perspective.

Authors:  Marina Mor Shalom; Erin E Hahn; Jacqueline Casillas; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 6.  Survivorship care plans in research and practice.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Kevin C Oeffinger; Mary S McCabe; Tracy M Layne; Peter B Bach
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Metrics to evaluate treatment summaries and survivorship care plans: a scorecard.

Authors:  Steven C Palmer; Linda A Jacobs; Angela DeMichele; Betsy Risendal; Alison F Jones; Carrie Tompkins Stricker
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Survivorship care plans: is there buy-in from community oncology providers?

Authors:  Talya Salz; Mary S McCabe; Erin E Onstad; Shrujal S Baxi; Richard L Deming; Regina A Franco; Lyn A Glenn; Gregory R Harper; Alcee J Jumonville; Roxanne M Payne; Elissa A Peters; Andrew L Salner; John M Schallenkamp; Sheron R Williams; Kevin Yiee; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Physician preferences and attitudes regarding different models of cancer survivorship care: a comparison of primary care providers and oncologists.

Authors:  Winson Y Cheung; Noreen Aziz; Anne-Michelle Noone; Julia H Rowland; Arnold L Potosky; John Z Ayanian; Katherine S Virgo; Patricia A Ganz; Michael Stefanek; Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 10.  The role of the GP in follow-up cancer care: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Judith A Meiklejohn; Alexander Mimery; Jennifer H Martin; Ross Bailie; Gail Garvey; Euan T Walpole; Jon Adams; Daniel Williamson; Patricia C Valery
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.