Literature DB >> 20182349

Factor X and factor II activity levels do not always agree in warfarin-treated lupus anticoagulant patients.

Terry K Rosborough1, Jennifer M Jacobsen, Michele F Shepherd.   

Abstract

Warfarin therapy is used in lupus anticoagulant patients with thrombosis and yet the prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio (INR) in these patients can sometimes be falsely elevated. Both a PT-based factor II (FII) assay and a chromogenic, enzymatic factor X (CFX) assay have been used for monitoring when the INR may be artifactual. This study compared FII and CFX assays in lupus anticoagulant-positive and lupus anticoagulant-negative warfarin-treated patients in a cross-sectional study of samples from 21 lupus anticoagulant-positive and 19 lupus anticoagulant-negative outpatients. Plasma samples were simultaneously measured for FII and CFX and the ratio of FII/CFX was used to measure concordance. Compared with lupus anticoagulant-negative patients 14 of the 21 lupus anticoagulant-positive patients had lower FII/CFX ratios (P < 0.01). Three of the patients had ratios less than 0.6 indicating strong disagreement (P < 0.0001). The patient with the lowest FII/CFX ratio had evidence suggesting a specific antibody to FII. Another patient showed that the discordance between FII and CFX varied over time. The CFX assay in the laboratory was technically superior, more precise, and less costly. The CFX assay is preferred for warfarin therapy monitoring in lupus anticoagulant patients when INR artifacts are suspected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20182349     DOI: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32833581a3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis        ISSN: 0957-5235            Impact factor:   1.276


  4 in total

1.  Monitoring anticoagulation in patients with an unreliable prothrombin time/international normalized ratio: factor II versus chromogenic factor X testing.

Authors:  Lisa M Baumann Kreuziger; Yvonne H Datta; Andrew D Johnson; Nicole D Zantek; Ryan Shanley; Mark T Reding
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.276

2.  Variability in the international normalised ratio (INR) in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and positive lupus anticoagulant: should the INR targets be higher?

Authors:  Marielena Baquero-Salamanca; Angélica María Téllez-Arévalo; Carlos Calderon-Ospina
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-04-09

3.  Rivaroxaban in antiphospholipid syndrome (RAPS) protocol: a prospective, randomized controlled phase II/III clinical trial of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, with or without SLE.

Authors:  H Cohen; C J Doré; S Clawson; B J Hunt; D Isenberg; M Khamashta; N Muirhead
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.911

Review 4. 

Authors:  Andreas Funke; Adriana Danowski; Danieli Castro Oliveira de Andrade; Jozelia Rêgo; Roger Abramino Levy
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.