Literature DB >> 20181877

Physical quality and composition of retail shell eggs.

D R Jones1, M T Musgrove, K E Anderson, H S Thesmar.   

Abstract

There are a number of specialty shell eggs available to consumers in the US retail market. A survey consisting of white and brown large shell eggs with various production and nutritional differences (traditional, cage-free, free-roaming, pasteurized, nutritionally enhanced, and fertile) was conducted to determine if physical quality and compositional differences exist. Identical brands of eggs were purchased from the same retail outlets on 3 occasions (replicates) in a single city. The average range of time from processing to purchase for all eggs was 7.67 to 25.33 d, with traditional white eggs in retail having the shortest time. Haugh unit values ranged from 66.67 (cage-free, docosahexaenoic acid, and n-3 enhanced) to 84.42 (traditional white). Albumen height followed a similar pattern. Egg weight was greater for brown eggs (61.12 vs. 58.85 g). Brown eggs also had greater static compression shell strength than white eggs (4,130.61 vs. 3,690.31 g force). Vitelline membrane strength was greatest for traditional brown eggs (2.24 g force). Percentage of total solids and crude fat was greatest in the cage-free, n-3-enhanced white eggs (25.07 and 11.71%, respectively). Although significant differences were found between white and brown shell eggs and production methods, average values for quality attributes varied without one egg type consistently maintaining the highest or lowest values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20181877     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2009-00315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  2 in total

1.  Effect of benzoic acid on production performance, egg quality, intestinal morphology, and cecal microbial community of laying hens.

Authors:  Haojie Gong; Zengqiao Yang; Pietro Celi; Lei Yan; Xuemei Ding; Shiping Bai; Qiufeng Zeng; Shengyu Xu; Zhuowei Su; Yong Zhuo; Keying Zhang; Jianping Wang
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Survey of egg quality in commercially available table eggs.

Authors:  Cirenio Hisasaga; Sara E Griffin; Katy J Tarrant
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.