Literature DB >> 20181524

Congenital heart disease and multi-modality imaging.

Rajesh Puranik1, Vivek Muthurangu, David S Celermajer, Andrew M Taylor.   

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of adult congenital heart disease (CHD) can be attributed to major improvements in diagnosis and treatment of children with CHD. Although, echocardiography is the most commonly used imaging modality for diagnosis and follow up of subjects with CHD, the evolution of both cardiovascular magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) does offer new ways to visualise the heart and great vessels. Cardiovascular MR techniques such as spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging, velocity-encoded phase-contrast MR and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography allow comprehensive assessment of cardiac anatomy and function. This provides information about the long-term sequelae of the underlying anatomy, haemodynamic assessment of residual post-operative lesions and complications of surgery. Similarly, the development of spiral and subsequently multi-detector CT enables the acquisition of data during a single breath-hold and during the first pass of a contrast bolus, so that images can be reconstructed in any two-dimensional plane or in three-dimensions. As much of the functional data in CHD patients was traditionally acquired with invasive X-ray angiography, non-invasive alternatives such as cardiovascular MR and CT are desirable. This review evaluates the role of imaging modalities in the management of subjects with CHD, particularly detailing recent developments in imaging techniques as they relate to the various CHD diagnoses commonly encountered in practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20181524     DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2010.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung Circ        ISSN: 1443-9506            Impact factor:   2.975


  7 in total

1.  Prospective comparison of echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with Ebstein's anomaly.

Authors:  Christine H Attenhofer Jost; Whitney D Edmister; Paul R Julsrud; Joseph A Dearani; M Savas Tepe; Carole A Warnes; Christopher G Scott; Nandan S Anavekar; Naser M Ammash; Heidi M Connolly
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Point/counterpoint: dose-related issues in cardiac CT imaging.

Authors:  Beverley Newman; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17

Review 3.  Cross-sectional imaging of congenital pulmonary artery anomalies.

Authors:  Evan J Zucker
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Exercise Performance in Children and Young Adults After Complete and Incomplete Repair of Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Omer Rosenblum; Uriel Katz; Ronen Reuveny; Craig A Williams; Gal Dubnov-Raz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 5.  Role of CT in the Pre- and Postoperative Assessment of Conotruncal Anomalies.

Authors:  Parveen Kumar; Mona Bhatia
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2022-06-30

6.  Cardiac imaging in adults with congenital heart disease: unknowns and issues related to diagnosis.

Authors:  Cylen Javidan-Nejad; Anderanik Tomasian; Elham Najafpour
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-10

7.  Patient-specific simulations for planning treatment in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Claudio Capelli; Emilie Sauvage; Giuliano Giusti; Giorgia M Bosi; Hopewell Ntsinjana; Mario Carminati; Graham Derrick; Jan Marek; Sachin Khambadkone; Andrew M Taylor; Silvia Schievano
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.906

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.