| Literature DB >> 20181131 |
Mohamad K Nusier1, Hedda Konstanse Brodtkorb, Siv Elisabeth Rein, Ahmed Odeh, Abdelrahman M Radaideh, Helge Klungland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Celiac disease (CD) emerged as a public health problem, and the disease prevalence varies among different races. The present study was designed to investigate the prevalence of CD using serological markers in apparently healthy schoolchildren in Irbid City, Jordan. Additionally, the effect of positive serology on height, weight and body mass index (BMI) was evaluated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20181131 PMCID: PMC2829574 DOI: 10.1186/1824-7288-36-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ital J Pediatr ISSN: 1720-8424 Impact factor: 2.638
Reasons for serological testing and grouping of celiac disease (CD) by symptoms (Fasano 2005, Rostom et al 2004).
| Classical CD | Atypical CD | Silent CD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasons for testing: | Investigation of intestinal symptoms. | Iron deficiency, osteoporosis, short stature, or infertility. | Screening. |
| Symptoms: | Intestinal symptoms. | Unusual intestinal complaints or extraintestinal manifestations. | Asymptomatic. |
Results of different screening studies for celiac disease, CD
| United Kingdom | 7.5 | 5470 | 1. tTG | 1:101 (1.0%)† | (Bingley et al 2004) |
| The Netherlands | 2 to 4 | 6127 | 1. IgA EmA | 1:82 (1.2%)‡ | (Csizmadia et al 1999) |
| The USA | 2 to 18 | 1281 | 1. IgA EmA | 1:320 (0.3%)§ | (Fasano et al 2003) |
| Finland | 7 to 16 | 3654 | 1. IgA EmA and IgA tTG | 1:73 (1.4%)|| | (Maki et al 2003) |
| Turkey | Adult blood donors | 2 000 | 1. IgA tTG | 1:87 (1.1%)‡ | (Tatar et al 2004) |
| North America and Western Europe | Children | Large population | Biopsy | 0.5% to 1.6%. | AHRQ No. 104 Celiac Disease 2004 |
tTG: tissue transglutaminase; EmA; anti-endomysium antibody.
*: 1. = the test(s) performed as screening test(s). 2. = the test performed for confirmation of the screening test.
† The prevalence is based on subjects confirmed positive with a second serological marker.
‡ The prevalence is based on subjects positive on only one serological marker.
§The prevalence is based on one serological marker (IgA EmA), but all tested positive on IgA tTG as well.
|| Two tests were carried out at the same time, and the serological prevalence is based on subjects positive on both tests.
Figure 1Flowchart for procedure and results of serological screening for celiac disease among schoolchildren in Irbid city, Jordan.