| Literature DB >> 20181027 |
Annalisa Rossi1, Oscar F D'Urso, Graziana Gatto, Palmiro Poltronieri, Manuela Ferracin, Paolo Remondelli, Massimo Negrini, Maria G Caporaso, Stefano Bonatti, Massimo Mallardo.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The importance of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) as fine regulators of eukaryotic gene expression has emerged by several studies focusing on microRNAs (miRNAs). miRNAs represent a newly discovered family of non coding-RNAs. They are thought to be crucial players of human hematopoiesis and related tumorigenesis and to represent a potential tool to detect the early stages of cancer. More recently, the expression regulation of numerous long ncRNAs has been linked to cell growth, differentiation and cancer although the molecular mechanism of their function is still unknown.NB4 cells are promyelocytic cells that can be induced to differentiation upon retinoic acid (ATRA) treatment and represent a feasible model to study changes of non coding RNAs expression between cancer cells and their terminally differentiated counterpart.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20181027 PMCID: PMC2843733 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-24
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
miRNAs with altered expression after ATRA induced differentation in NB4 cells by microarray analysis.
| Name | P-value | NB4 expression | NB4 + ATRA expression | TvsUT | Validation | Densitometry | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0,0447 | 2,944 | 1,388 | 13q31 | Down | down | 6.0 fold | |
| 0,0447 | 0,864 | 0,891 | 1p31 | Up | up | 0.5 fold | |
| 0,0385 | 1,031 | 0,847 | 17q11.2 | Down | down | 1.2 fold | |
| 0,0373 | 2,618 | 1,954 | 17p13 | Down | down | 0.8 fold | |
| 0,0351 | 7,56 | 3,157 | 7q22 | Down | down | 4.1 fold | |
| 0,0243 | 0,962 | 0,889 | 9q22.2 | Down | up | 3.2 fold | |
| 0,0104 | 0,691 | 0,792 | 1q41 | Up | up | 0.5 fold | |
| 0.0232 | 8.68 | 17.08 | Xq12-13.3 | Up | up | 10.6 fold |
In the table are showed for each miRNA the name (hsa = human miRNAs), the P-value, the normalization of two independent experiment (NB4 = untreated; NB4-ATRA = treated); the locus map (map); the expression in treated versus untreated cells (T vs UT) and the expression (T vs UT) after northen blot validation (validation: up = upregulation; down = downregulation); the densitometry shows the average of three independent experiments.
Figure 1Cluster analysis of treated and untreated NB4 cell lines using the 8 human miRNAs differentially expressed and Northern blot validation of miR-223, miR-17 and miR-25. A) Cluster analysis, made only for the human miRNAs, reveals that the 8 miRNAs changed their expression after treatment. In fact, red color means that the expression of the miR is higher in NB4 cell line treated with ATRA while green color means that the expression is lower. Yellow means no variation. B, C, D) 15 μg of total RNA was loaded in each lane from two independent experiments. The membranes were probed as indicated on the side: B) miR- 17 probe and U6 snRNA probe; C) miR-25 probe and U6 snRNA probe; D) miR- 223 probe and U6 snRNA probe. Note that for the miR-17 is visualized also the precursor (prec. miR-17). T = 6 days of 0.5 mM ATRA treatment, UT = untreated.
Figure 2Long non-protein coding RNAs are deregulated during ATRA differentiation of NB4 cells. A) In the table are showed the 58 ncRNAs found deregulated in ATRA treated NB4 cells. Asterisks indicate the ncRNAs validate by quantitative real-time PCR. B) Real time confirmed the microarray data. The experiments, performed three times, are shown as fold induction of ATRA NB4 vs. untreated NB4 (UT). The bars indicates ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed with Prism v4.0 (GraphPad software); asterisk indicate significant differences between ATRA treated NB4 and UT NB4 according to the two-tailed unpaired Student's t test (*, P < 0.05). The primer sequences, used for the real time PCR are shown in the supplementary file 3.