BACKGROUND: With increasing frequency, patients with cancer and their family members are turning to the Internet to educate themselves about their disease and treatment options, including complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and supportive care. However, very little is known about how national leading cancer centers represent these therapies via their websites. METHODS: Simulating the perspective of an information-seeking patient or family member, we performed a systematic analysis of the websites of 41 National Cancer Institute designated comprehensive cancer centers. Two researchers independently evaluated websites, recorded CAM information, and rated quality of the websites using a 4-item Likert scale (overall, information, presentation, and navigation) with Cronbach's alpha = 0.97. Rating was adequately correlated between the two raters (correlation coefficient 0.8). RESULTS: Of 41 centers, 12 (29%) did not have functional websites with regard to information related to CAM. The most common CAM approaches mentioned were: acupuncture (59%), meditation/nutrition/spiritual support/yoga (56% for each), massage therapy (54%), and music therapy (51%). Twenty-three (23; 56%) presented information on support groups, 19 (46%) on patient seminars, 18 (44%) on survivorship effort, and 17 (41%) on symptom management clinics. Twenty-nine (29) (71%) of these websites had a telephone number available, 22 (54%) mentioned at least one ongoing research opportunity, and 19 (46%) provided links to the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine website. Median rating of the quality of websites was 50 of 100, with only 7 (17%) of centers receiving a composite score 80 (excellent) or better. CONCLUSIONS: While a growing number of leading cancer centers provide information about CAM and supportive oncology information for patients via their websites, the quality and ease of navigation of these sites remain highly variable. Effective development and redesign of many of the websites is needed to better inform and empower patients and families seeking CAM and supportive care information.
BACKGROUND: With increasing frequency, patients with cancer and their family members are turning to the Internet to educate themselves about their disease and treatment options, including complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and supportive care. However, very little is known about how national leading cancer centers represent these therapies via their websites. METHODS: Simulating the perspective of an information-seeking patient or family member, we performed a systematic analysis of the websites of 41 National Cancer Institute designated comprehensive cancer centers. Two researchers independently evaluated websites, recorded CAM information, and rated quality of the websites using a 4-item Likert scale (overall, information, presentation, and navigation) with Cronbach's alpha = 0.97. Rating was adequately correlated between the two raters (correlation coefficient 0.8). RESULTS: Of 41 centers, 12 (29%) did not have functional websites with regard to information related to CAM. The most common CAM approaches mentioned were: acupuncture (59%), meditation/nutrition/spiritual support/yoga (56% for each), massage therapy (54%), and music therapy (51%). Twenty-three (23; 56%) presented information on support groups, 19 (46%) on patient seminars, 18 (44%) on survivorship effort, and 17 (41%) on symptom management clinics. Twenty-nine (29) (71%) of these websites had a telephone number available, 22 (54%) mentioned at least one ongoing research opportunity, and 19 (46%) provided links to the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine website. Median rating of the quality of websites was 50 of 100, with only 7 (17%) of centers receiving a composite score 80 (excellent) or better. CONCLUSIONS: While a growing number of leading cancer centers provide information about CAM and supportive oncology information for patients via their websites, the quality and ease of navigation of these sites remain highly variable. Effective development and redesign of many of the websites is needed to better inform and empower patients and families seeking CAM and supportive care information.
Authors: Gary E Deng; Barrie R Cassileth; Lorenzo Cohen; Jyothirmai Gubili; Peter A S Johnstone; Nagi Kumar; Andrew Vickers; Donald Abrams; David Rosenthal; Stephen Sagar; Debu Tripathy Journal: J Soc Integr Oncol Date: 2007
Authors: Elmer V Bernstam; Muhammad F Walji; Smitha Sagaram; Deepak Sagaram; Craig W Johnson; Funda Meric-Bernstam Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-03-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Funda Meric; Elmer V Bernstam; Nadeem Q Mirza; Kelly K Hunt; Frederick C Ames; Merrick I Ross; Henry M Kuerer; Raphael E Pollock; Mark A Musen; S Eva Singletary Journal: BMJ Date: 2002-03-09
Authors: Paul R Helft; Rachael E Eckles; Cynthia Stair Johnson-Calley; Christopher K Daugherty Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jun J Mao; Steve C Palmer; Joseph B Straton; Peter F Cronholm; Shimrit Keddem; Kathryn Knott; Marjorie A Bowman; Frances K Barg Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Jun James Mao; Christina Shearer Palmer; Kaitlin Elizabeth Healy; Krupali Desai; Jay Amsterdam Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Farah Z Zia; Oluwadamilola Olaku; Ting Bao; Ann Berger; Gary Deng; Arthur Yin Fan; Mary K Garcia; Patricia M Herman; Ted J Kaptchuk; Elena J Ladas; Helene M Langevin; Lixing Lao; Weidong Lu; Vitaly Napadow; Richard C Niemtzow; Andrew J Vickers; Xin Shelley Wang; Claudia M Witt; Jun J Mao Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2017-11-01
Authors: Ralph Muecke; Magdalena Paul; Christina Conrad; Christoph Stoll; Karsten Muenstedt; Oliver Micke; Franz J Prott; Jens Buentzel; Jutta Huebner Journal: Integr Cancer Ther Date: 2015-07-26 Impact factor: 3.279
Authors: Magda Paul; B Davey; B Senf; C Stoll; K Münstedt; R Mücke; Oliver Micke; F J Prott; J Buentzel; Jutta Hübner Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2013-07-06 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Stephanie J Sohl; Laurel A Borowski; Erin E Kent; Ashley Wilder Smith; Ingrid Oakley-Girvan; Russell L Rothman; Neeraj K Arora Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jun J Mao; Sharon X Xie; John T Farrar; Carrie T Stricker; Marjorie A Bowman; Deborah Bruner; Angela DeMichele Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Jutta Huebner; Karsten Muenstedt; Franz J Prott; Christoph Stoll; Oliver Micke; Jens Buentzel; Ralph Muecke; Bianca Senf Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Marilyn M Schapira; Elizabeth R Mackenzie; Regina Lam; David Casarett; Christina M Seluzicki; Frances K Barg; Jun J Mao Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-12-21 Impact factor: 3.603