Literature DB >> 2018004

Reproducibility of Doppler echocardiographic quantification of aortic and mitral valve stenoses: comparison between two echocardiography centers.

A Geibel1, L Görnandt, W Kasper, P Bubenheimer.   

Abstract

Doppler echocardiography has been widely used as a noninvasive method to quantify valvular heart diseases. This study assessed the variability between 2 echocardiography centers concerning 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic results in the quantification of mitral and aortic valve stenoses. Forty-two patients were studied by 2 different echocardiography centers in a blinded, independent fashion. In patients with aortic and mitral valve stenosis, mean and maximal flow velocities were measured. The aortic valve orifice area was calculated according to the continuity equation. Mitral valve orifice area was determined by direct planimetry and by pressure half-time. In patients with an aortic valve stenosis, a close relation between the 2 centers was found for the maximal and mean flow velocities (coefficient of correlation, r = 0.72 to 0.92; coefficient of variation, 3.7 to 7.7%). A close correlation and a small observer variability was found for the flow velocity ratio determined by flow velocities measured in the left ventricular outflow tract and over the stenotic valve (r = 0.88; coefficient of variation, 0.01 +/- 0.009). In contrast, there was a poor correlation between the diameter of the left ventricular outflow tract and the aortic orifice area (r = 0.36 and 0.59, respectively). In patients with a mitral valve stenosis, mean and maximal velocities were closely correlated (r = 0.85 and 0.77, respectively). Velocities were not found to be significantly different between the 2 centers. Variability between the 2 centers for the mitral valve orifice area was 9.8% (2-dimensional echocardiography) and 5.7% (pressure half-time).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2018004     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90176-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques.

Authors:  C Kupfahl; M Honold; G Meinhardt; H Vogelsberg; A Wagner; H Mahrholdt; U Sechtem
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Echocardiographic and electron beam tomographic assessment of stenosis in patients with aortic valve disease: gradient versus valve area.

Authors:  L H Piers; R Dikkers; R A Tio; M P van den Berg; T P Willems; M Oudkerk; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Aortic valve area: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of multi-detector computed tomography for aortic valve area measurements as compared to transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Rajnil G Shah; Gian M Novaro; Rodolfo J Blandon; Mitchell S Whiteman; Craig R Asher; Jacobo Kirsch
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Assessing left ventricular systolic function in shock: evaluation of echocardiographic parameters in intensive care.

Authors:  Lill Bergenzaun; Petri Gudmundsson; Hans Öhlin; Joachim Düring; Anders Ersson; Lilian Ihrman; Ronnie Willenheimer; Michelle S Chew
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  A comparison of echocardiographic and electron beam computed tomographic assessment of aortic valve area in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Lieuwe H Piers; Riksta Dikkers; René A Tio; Maarten P van den Berg; Tineke P Willems; Felix Zijlstra; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Doppler assessment of aortic stenosis: a 25-operator study demonstrating why reading the peak velocity is superior to velocity time integral.

Authors:  Stefania Sacchi; Niti M Dhutia; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Massoud Zolgharni; Nilesh Sutaria; Darrel P Francis; Graham D Cole
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.875

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.