RATIONAL: Although delta-9-tetreahydrocannabinol (THC)-induced elevations in accumbal dopamine levels are believed to play an important role in the abuse-related effects of cannabis, little direct evidence has been provided that the dopaminergic system is involved in the psychotropic effects of THC. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate whether drugs activating or blocking the dopaminergic system modulate the discriminative effects of THC. METHODS AND RESULTS: In rats that had learned to discriminate 3 mg/kg of THC from vehicle injections, the indirect dopaminergic agonists cocaine and amphetamine, the D(1)-receptor agonist SKF-38393, and the D(2)-receptor agonists quinpirole and apomorphine did not produce significant THC-like discriminative effects. However, both cocaine and amphetamine and D(2)-, but not the D(1)-, receptor agonists, augmented THC discrimination. Neither the D(1)-receptor antagonist SCH-23390 nor the D(2)-receptor antagonist raclopride reduced the discriminative effects of THC, even at doses that significantly depressed baseline operant responding. However, the D(2)-, but not the D(1)-, antagonist counteracted the augmentation of THC's discriminative effects produced by cocaine and amphetamine. We hypothesized that release of anandamide by activation of D(2) receptors was responsible for the observed augmentation of THC discrimination. This hypothesis was supported by two findings. First, the cannabinoid CB(1)-receptor antagonist rimonabant blocked quinpirole-induced augmentation of THC discrimination. Second, inhibition of anandamide degradation by blockade of fatty acid amide hydrolase augmented the THC-like effects of quinpirole. CONCLUSIONS: Dopamine does not play a major role in THC discrimination. However, activation of the dopaminergic system positively modulates the discriminative effects of THC, possibly through D(2)-induced elevations in brain levels of anandamide.
RATIONAL: Although delta-9-tetreahydrocannabinol (THC)-induced elevations in accumbal dopamine levels are believed to play an important role in the abuse-related effects of cannabis, little direct evidence has been provided that the dopaminergic system is involved in the psychotropic effects of THC. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate whether drugs activating or blocking the dopaminergic system modulate the discriminative effects of THC. METHODS AND RESULTS: In rats that had learned to discriminate 3 mg/kg of THC from vehicle injections, the indirect dopaminergic agonists cocaine and amphetamine, the D(1)-receptor agonist SKF-38393, and the D(2)-receptor agonists quinpirole and apomorphine did not produce significant THC-like discriminative effects. However, both cocaine and amphetamine and D(2)-, but not the D(1)-, receptor agonists, augmented THC discrimination. Neither the D(1)-receptor antagonist SCH-23390 nor the D(2)-receptor antagonist raclopride reduced the discriminative effects of THC, even at doses that significantly depressed baseline operant responding. However, the D(2)-, but not the D(1)-, antagonist counteracted the augmentation of THC's discriminative effects produced by cocaine and amphetamine. We hypothesized that release of anandamide by activation of D(2) receptors was responsible for the observed augmentation of THC discrimination. This hypothesis was supported by two findings. First, the cannabinoid CB(1)-receptor antagonist rimonabant blocked quinpirole-induced augmentation of THC discrimination. Second, inhibition of anandamide degradation by blockade of fatty acid amide hydrolase augmented the THC-like effects of quinpirole. CONCLUSIONS:Dopamine does not play a major role in THC discrimination. However, activation of the dopaminergic system positively modulates the discriminative effects of THC, possibly through D(2)-induced elevations in brain levels of anandamide.
Authors: Shirley Y Hill; Bobby L Jones; Stuart R Steinhauer; Nicholas Zezza; Scott Stiffler Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Maddalena Mereu; Valeria Tronci; Lauren E Chun; Alexandra M Thomas; Jennifer L Green; Jonathan L Katz; Gianluigi Tanda Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2013-08-04 Impact factor: 4.280