Literature DB >> 20179214

Accurate outcome prediction in neuroblastoma across independent data sets using a multigene signature.

Katleen De Preter1, Joëlle Vermeulen, Benedikt Brors, Olivier Delattre, Angelika Eggert, Matthias Fischer, Isabelle Janoueix-Lerosey, Cinzia Lavarino, John M Maris, Jaume Mora, Akira Nakagawara, André Oberthuer, Miki Ohira, Gudrun Schleiermacher, Alexander Schramm, Johannes H Schulte, Qun Wang, Frank Westermann, Frank Speleman, Jo Vandesompele.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Reliable prognostic stratification remains a challenge for cancer patients, especially for diseases with variable clinical course such as neuroblastoma. Although numerous studies have shown that outcome might be predicted using gene expression signatures, independent cross-platform validation is often lacking. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Using eight independent studies comprising 933 neuroblastoma patients, a prognostic gene expression classifier was developed, trained, tested, and validated. The classifier was established based on reanalysis of four published studies with updated clinical information, reannotation of the probe sequences, common risk definition for training cases, and a single method for gene selection (prediction analysis of microarray) and classification (correlation analysis).
RESULTS: Based on 250 training samples from four published microarray data sets, a correlation signature was built using 42 robust prognostic genes. The resulting classifier was validated on 351 patients from four independent and unpublished data sets and on 129 remaining test samples from the published studies. Patients with divergent outcome in the total cohort, as well as in the different risk groups, were accurately classified (log-rank P < 0.001 for overall and progression-free survival in the four independent data sets). Moreover, the 42-gene classifier was shown to be an independent predictor for survival (odds ratio, >5).
CONCLUSION: The strength of this 42-gene classifier is its small number of genes and its cross-platform validity in which it outperforms other published prognostic signatures. The robustness and accuracy of the classifier enables prospective assessment of neuroblastoma patient outcome. Most importantly, this gene selection procedure might be an example for development and validation of robust gene expression signatures in other cancer entities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20179214     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  40 in total

Review 1.  New aspects of neuroblastoma treatment: ASPHO 2011 symposium review.

Authors:  Peter E Zage; Chrystal U Louis; Susan L Cohn
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Calreticulin is the dominant pro-phagocytic signal on multiple human cancers and is counterbalanced by CD47.

Authors:  Mark P Chao; Siddhartha Jaiswal; Rachel Weissman-Tsukamoto; Ash A Alizadeh; Andrew J Gentles; Jens Volkmer; Kipp Weiskopf; Stephen B Willingham; Tal Raveh; Christopher Y Park; Ravindra Majeti; Irving L Weissman
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Predicting neuroblastoma using developmental signals and a logic-based model.

Authors:  Jennifer C Kasemeier-Kulesa; Santiago Schnell; Thomas Woolley; Jennifer A Spengler; Jason A Morrison; Mary C McKinney; Irina Pushel; Lauren A Wolfe; Paul M Kulesa
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Design of a multi-signature ensemble classifier predicting neuroblastoma patients' outcome.

Authors:  Andrea Cornero; Massimo Acquaviva; Paolo Fardin; Rogier Versteeg; Alexander Schramm; Alessandra Eva; Maria Carla Bosco; Fabiola Blengio; Sara Barzaghi; Luigi Varesio
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Validation of a prognostic multi-gene signature in high-risk neuroblastoma using the high throughput digital NanoString nCounter™ system.

Authors:  Thomas P Stricker; Andres Morales La Madrid; Alexandre Chlenski; Lisa Guerrero; Helen R Salwen; Yasmin Gosiengfiao; Elizabeth J Perlman; Wayne Furman; Armita Bahrami; Jason M Shohet; Peter E Zage; M John Hicks; Hiroyuki Shimada; Rie Suganuma; Julie R Park; Sara So; Wendy B London; Peter Pytel; Kirsteen H Maclean; Susan L Cohn
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 6.603

6.  New strategies in refractory and recurrent neuroblastoma: translational opportunities to impact patient outcome.

Authors:  Kristina A Cole; John M Maris
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  The role of genetic and epigenetic alterations in neuroblastoma disease pathogenesis.

Authors:  Raquel Domingo-Fernandez; Karen Watters; Olga Piskareva; Raymond L Stallings; Isabella Bray
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Redefining functional MYCN gene signatures in neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Jason Matthew Shohet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  miRNA expression profiling enables risk stratification in archived and fresh neuroblastoma tumor samples.

Authors:  Katleen De Preter; Pieter Mestdagh; Joëlle Vermeulen; Fjoralba Zeka; Arlene Naranjo; Isabella Bray; Victoria Castel; Caifu Chen; Elzbieta Drozynska; Angelika Eggert; Michael D Hogarty; Ewa Izycka-Swieszewska; Wendy B London; Rosa Noguera; Marta Piqueras; Kenneth Bryan; Benjamin Schowe; Peter van Sluis; Jan J Molenaar; Alexander Schramm; Johannes H Schulte; Raymond L Stallings; Rogier Versteeg; Geneviève Laureys; Nadine Van Roy; Frank Speleman; Jo Vandesompele
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  snoRNPs Regulate Telomerase Activity in Neuroblastoma and Are Associated with Poor Prognosis.

Authors:  Kristoffer von Stedingk; Jan Koster; Marta Piqueras; Rosa Noguera; Samuel Navarro; Sven Påhlman; Rogier Versteeg; Ingrid Ora; David Gisselsson; David Lindgren; Håkan Axelson
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.