Literature DB >> 20178941

Recognizing and predicting movement effects: identifying critical movement features.

Rouwen Cañal-Bruland1, A Mark Williams.   

Abstract

It is not clear whether the critical features used to discriminate movements are identical to those involved in predicting the same movement's effects and consequently, whether the mechanisms underlying recognition and anticipation differ. We examined whether people rely on different kinematic information when required to recognize differences in the movement pattern in comparison to when they have to anticipate the outcome of these same movements. Naïve participants were presented with paired presentations of point-light animated tennis shots that ended at racket-ball contact. We instructed them either to judge whether the movements observed were the same or different or to predict shot direction (left vs. right). In addition, we locally manipulated the kinematics of point-light figures in an effort to identify the critical features used when making recognition and anticipation judgments. It appears that observers rely on different sources of information when required to recognize movement differences compared to when they need to anticipate the outcome of the same observed movements. Findings are discussed with reference to recent ideas focusing on the role of perceptual and motor resonance in perceptual judgments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20178941     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  6 in total

1.  Recognition of tennis serve performed by a digital player: comparison among polygon, shadow, and stick-figure models.

Authors:  Hirofumi Ida; Kazunobu Fukuhara; Motonobu Ishii
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Brain regions concerned with the identification of deceptive soccer moves by higher-skilled and lower-skilled players.

Authors:  Michael J Wright; Daniel T Bishop; Robin C Jackson; Bruce Abernethy
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Deception Detection in Action: Embodied Simulation in Antisocial Human Interactions.

Authors:  Rouwen Cañal-Bruland
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-07

4.  Judges' evaluation reliability changes between identifiable and anonymous performance of hip-hop dance movements.

Authors:  Nahoko Sato; Luke S Hopper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Deceptive body movements reverse spatial cueing in soccer.

Authors:  Michael J Wright; Robin C Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Exploring Cognitive and Perceptual Judgment Processes in Gymnastics Using Essential Kinematics Information.

Authors:  Melanie Mack
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2019-02-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.