Literature DB >> 20178526

Maternal and fetal mortality and complications associated with cesarean section deliveries in teaching hospitals in Asia.

Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong1, Hafni Bachtiar, Mahbub Elahi Chowdhury, Sunil Fernando, Chitkasaem Suwanrath, Ounjai Kor-Anantakul, Le Anh Tuan, Apiradee Lim, Pisake Lumbiganon, Bekha Manandhar, Masrul Muchtar, Lutfan Nahar, Nguyen Trong Hieu, Pan Xiao Fang, Witoon Prasertcharoensuk, Erdenetungalag Radnaabarzar, Daulat Sibuea, Kyu Kyu Than, Piangjit Tharnpaisan, Tran Son Thach, Patrick Rowe.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the mortality, morbidity of emergency and elective cesarean section with vaginal delivery among Asian teaching hospitals.
METHODS: Hospital based prospective study at 12 centers of 9 countries.
RESULTS: 12 591 vaginal deliveries, 3062 elective and 4328 emergency cesarean section were followed up to 5 days postpartum. Maternal deaths (95% CI) per 1000 births among vaginal deliveries being 0.47 (0.17, 1.03) was not significantly different from 0.31 (0.01, 1.73) of elective cesarean section and both rates were significantly lower than 2.87 (1.53, 4.91) per 1000 births of emergency section. The vaginal delivery group had significantly lower incidences of all major complication except significantly higher chance of secondary operations and non-significantly different risk for endometritis. Corresponding neonatal mortality per 1000 deliveries among the three groups were 7 (5.6, 8.6), 2.2 (0.9, 4.6) and 12.4 (9.3, 16.2) (P < 0.001). Vaginal delivery also had higher rates of severe asphyxia and palsy than elective cesarean section.
CONCLUSION: Maternal complications were increased by cesarean delivery but elective section may reduce neonatal complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20178526     DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01100.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  6 in total

1.  Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Gordon Cs Smith; Alexandros A Moraitis; David Wastlund; Jim G Thornton; Aris Papageorghiou; Julia Sanders; Alexander Ep Heazell; Stephen C Robson; Ulla Sovio; Peter Brocklehurst; Edward Cf Wilson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Acceptance of trial of labor after cesarean (Tolac) among obstetricians in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Khulood Hussein; Abdulrahim Gari; Ruqayyah Kamal; Hussam Alzharani; Nasir Alsubai; Tayy Aljuhani; Husam Katib
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Socio-demographic predictors and average annual rates of caesarean section in Bangladesh between 2004 and 2014.

Authors:  Md Nuruzzaman Khan; M Mofizul Islam; Asma Ahmad Shariff; Md Mahmudul Alam; Md Mostafizur Rahman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Monitoring the progress of health-related sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Brazilian states using the Global Burden of Disease indicators.

Authors:  Daiane Borges Machado; Júlia Moreira Pescarini; Dandara Ramos; Renato Teixeira; Rafael Lozano; Vinicius Oliveira de Moura Pereira; Cimar Azeredo; Rômulo Paes-Sousa; Deborah Carvalho Malta; Mauricio L Barreto
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2020-09-30

5.  Caesarean Delivery and Postpartum Maternal Mortality: A Population-Based Case Control Study in Brazil.

Authors:  Ana Paula Esteves-Pereira; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux; Marcos Nakamura-Pereira; Monica Saucedo; Marie-Hélène Bouvier-Colle; Maria do Carmo Leal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Dual Burden of Malnutrition Increases the Risk of Cesarean Delivery: Evidence From India.

Authors:  Jonathan C K Wells; Rasmus Wibaek; Marios Poullas
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-10-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.