Literature DB >> 20178131

Variability among nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Elvira L Massó González1, Paola Patrignani, Stefania Tacconelli, Luis A García Rodríguez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Traditional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increase the risk of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding/perforation, but the magnitude of this effect for coxibs in the general population and the degree of variability between individual NSAIDs is still under debate. This study was undertaken to assess the risk of upper GI bleeding/perforation among users of individual NSAIDs and to analyze the correlation between this risk and the degree of inhibition of whole blood cyclooxygenase 1 (COX-1) and COX-2 in vitro.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of observational studies on NSAIDs and upper GI bleeding/perforation published between 2000 and 2008. We calculated pooled relative risk (RR) estimates of upper GI bleeding/perforation for individual NSAIDs. Additionally, we verified whether the degree of inhibition of whole blood COX-1 and COX-2 in vitro by average circulating concentrations predicted the RR of upper GI bleeding/perforation.
RESULTS: The RR of upper GI bleeding/perforation was 4.50 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.82-5.31) for traditional NSAIDs and 1.88 (95% CI 0.96-3.71) for coxibs. RRs lower than that for NSAIDs overall were observed for ibuprofen (2.69 [95% CI 2.17-3.33]), rofecoxib (2.12 [95% CI 1.59-2.84]), aceclofenac (1.44 [95% CI 0.65-3.2]), and celecoxib (1.42 [95% CI 0.85-2.37]), while higher RRs were observed for ketorolac (14.54 [95% CI 5.87-36.04]) and piroxicam (9.94 [95% CI 5.99-16.50). Estimated RRs were 5.63 (95% CI 3.83-8.28) for naproxen, 5.57 (95% CI 3.94-7.87) for ketoprofen, 5.40 (95% CI 4.16-7.00) for indomethacin, 4.15 (95% CI 2.59-6.64) for meloxicam, and 3.98 (95% CI 3.36-4.72) for diclofenac. The degree of inhibition of whole blood COX-1 did not significantly correlate with RR of upper GI bleeding/perforation associated with individual NSAIDs (r(2) = 0.34, P = 0.058), but a profound and coincident inhibition (>80%) of both COX isozymes was associated with higher risk. NSAIDs with a long plasma half-life and with a slow-release formulation were associated with a greater risk than NSAIDs with a short half-life.
CONCLUSION: The results of our analysis demonstrate that risk of upper GI bleeding/perforation varies between individual NSAIDs at the doses commonly used in the general population. Drugs that have a long half-life or slow-release formulation and/or are associated with profound and coincident inhibition of both COX isozymes are associated with a greater risk of upper GI bleeding/perforation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20178131     DOI: 10.1002/art.27412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  74 in total

1.  American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: management of acute and chronic pain.

Authors:  Amanda M Brandow; C Patrick Carroll; Susan Creary; Ronisha Edwards-Elliott; Jeffrey Glassberg; Robert W Hurley; Abdullah Kutlar; Mohamed Seisa; Jennifer Stinson; John J Strouse; Fouza Yusuf; William Zempsky; Eddy Lang
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-06-23

2.  Strategies for making analgesia safer: the role of comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2010-06

Review 3.  Coming to terms with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy.

Authors:  Sanford H Roth
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Empirical performance of LGPS and LEOPARD: lessons for developing a risk identification and analysis system.

Authors:  Martijn J Schuemie; David Madigan; Patrick B Ryan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Serious upper gastrointestinal complications of NSAIDs and COX-2 selective agents.

Authors:  Guy Sisson; Ingvar Bjarnason
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.473

6.  Model-based prediction of the acute and long-term safety profile of naproxen in rats.

Authors:  Tarjinder Sahota; Ian Sanderson; Meindert Danhof; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  Hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions in the elderly. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  T J Oscanoa; F Lizaraso; Alfonso Carvajal
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  The Role of European Healthcare Databases for Post-Marketing Drug Effectiveness, Safety and Value Evaluation: Where Does Italy Stand?

Authors:  Gianluca Trifirò; Rosa Gini; Francesco Barone-Adesi; Ettore Beghi; Anna Cantarutti; Annalisa Capuano; Carla Carnovale; Antonio Clavenna; Mirosa Dellagiovanna; Carmen Ferrajolo; Matteo Franchi; Ylenia Ingrasciotta; Ursula Kirchmayer; Francesco Lapi; Roberto Leone; Olivia Leoni; Ersilia Lucenteforte; Ugo Moretti; Alessandro Mugelli; Luigi Naldi; Elisabetta Poluzzi; Concita Rafaniello; Federico Rea; Janet Sultana; Mauro Tettamanti; Giuseppe Traversa; Alfredo Vannacci; Lorenzo Mantovani; Giovanni Corrao
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Rofecoxib and clinically significant upper and lower gastrointestinal events revisited based on documents from recent litigation.

Authors:  David Y Graham; Nicholas P Jewell; Francis K L Chan
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.378

10.  Effects of ibuprofen, diclofenac, naproxen, and piroxicam on the course of pregnancy and pregnancy outcome: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  K Nezvalová-Henriksen; O Spigset; H Nordeng
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 6.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.