Literature DB >> 20177977

Plantar fascia evaluation with a dedicated magnetic resonance scanner in weight-bearing position: our experience in patients with plantar fasciitis and in healthy volunteers.

R Sutera1, A Iovane, F Sorrentino, F Candela, V Mularo, G La Tona, M Midiri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study assessed the usefulness of upright weight-bearing examination of the ankle/hind foot performed with a dedicated magnetic resonance (MR) imaging scanner in the evaluation of the plantar fascia in healthy volunteers and in patients with clinical evidence of plantar fasciitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January and March 2009, 20 patients with clinical evidence of plantar fasciitis (group A) and a similar number of healthy volunteers (group B) underwent MR imaging of the ankle/hind foot in the upright weight-bearing and conventional supine position. A 0.25-Tesla MR scanner (G-Scan, Esaote SpA, Genoa, Italy) was used with a dedicated receiving coil for the ankle/hind foot. Three radiologists, blinded to patients' history and clinical findings, assessed in consensus morphological and dimensional changes and signal intensity alterations on images acquired in both positions, in different sequences and in different planes.
RESULTS: In group A, MR imaging confirmed the diagnosis in 15/20 cases; in 4/15 cases, a partial tear of the plantar fascia was identified in the upright weight-bearing position alone. In the remaining 5/20 cases in group A and in all cases in group B, the plantar fascia showed no abnormal signal intensity. Because of the increased stretching of the plantar fascia, in all cases in group A and B, thickness in the proximal third was significantly reduced (p<0.0001) under upright weight-bearing compared with the supine position.
CONCLUSIONS: Imaging the ankle/hind foot in the upright weight-bearing position with a dedicated MR scanner and a dedicated coil might enable the identification of partial tears of the plantar fascia, which could be overlooked in the supine position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20177977     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-010-0534-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  13 in total

1.  Disorders of the plantar aponeurosis: a spectrum of MR imaging findings.

Authors:  D J Theodorou; S J Theodorou; S Farooki; Y Kakitsubata; D Resnick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Ultrasound evaluation of plantar fasciitis.

Authors:  W C Tsai; M F Chiu; C L Wang; F T Tang; M K Wong
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  The pathomechanics of plantar fasciitis.

Authors:  Scott C Wearing; James E Smeathers; Stephen R Urry; Ewald M Hennig; Andrew P Hills
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  MRI of plantar fasciitis.

Authors:  B Roger; P Grenier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Plantar fasciitis and fascial rupture: MR imaging findings in 26 patients supplemented with anatomic data in cadavers.

Authors:  D J Theodorou; S J Theodorou; Y Kakitsubata; N Lektrakul; G E Gold; B Roger; D Resnick
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  MR imaging of plantar fasciitis: edema, tears, and occult marrow abnormalities correlated with outcome.

Authors:  R P Grasel; M E Schweitzer; A M Kovalovich; D Karasick; K Wapner; P Hecht; D Wander
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Pathologic and post-operative conditions of the plantar fascia: review of MR imaging appearances.

Authors:  J S Yu
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  MR imaging of abnormalities of the plantar fascia.

Authors:  Daphne J Theodorou; Stavroula J Theodorou; Donald Resnick
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Plantar fascia ruptures in athletes.

Authors:  Amol Saxena; Brian Fullem
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Painful heel: MR imaging findings.

Authors:  J A Narváez; J Narváez; R Ortega; C Aguilera; A Sánchez; E Andía
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

View more
  2 in total

1.  Navicular bone position determined by positional MRI: a reproducibility study.

Authors:  Philip Hansen; Finn E Johannsen; Stine Hangaard; Sandra E Stallknecht; Bjarke B Hansen; Janus D Nybing; Mikael Boesen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Medical imaging for plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chris Drake; Glen A Whittaker; Michelle R Kaminski; John Chen; Anne-Maree Keenan; Michael S Rathleff; Philip Robinson; Karl B Landorf
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.303

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.