Literature DB >> 20177941

Band erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: a retrospective analysis of 865 patients over 5 years.

P T Cherian1, G Goussous, F Ashori, A Sigurdsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric band erosion is a well-reported complication after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). The published literature is limited and inconclusive with regard to its management. The authors therefore reviewed all band erosions detected during a 5-year period in a high-volume bariatric practice. Because a significant proportion of the band insertions (65%) were undertaken by an operator beyond his learning curve, the authors hoped to gain a mature, comprehensive understanding of this significant complication.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the operative log of the operating theaters in their obesity surgery unit to find all the operations performed on LAGB patients for erosion from January 2003 to December 2007. The clinical notes and electronic records for each patient were reviewed. These data were cross-referenced against the authors' obesity surgery database, and denominator data such as the total number operations performed and demographics were found. Finally, postoperative outcomes were collated from the outpatient follow-up data and telephonic interviews, and the results were analyzed.
RESULTS: From January 2003 to December 2007, a single surgeon performed 865 LAGBs in the authors' unit. The authors identified 18 operations performed for LAGB erosions. The 18 patients (one referred from elsewhere, 14 women) formed the final study cohort (median preoperative body mass index [BMI], 46 kg/m(2)). Of the 17 erosions, 15 occurred relatively early in the series. The patients with the 213 Swedish adjustable gastric bands experienced 12 erosions (incidence, 5.6%) compared with 6 erosions with the 652 LAP-BANDs (incidence, 0.9%). The median time to presentation was 7 months (range, 1-60 months). However, 55% of the erosions (n = 10) occurred within the first year, and only 10% occurred after the second year. The most common presenting symptom was pain followed by weight regain. None of the patients experienced peritonitis. After surgical management of the erosion, three patients had a second LAGB and at this writing are well. Of the remaining patients, 11 are well, but 6 of these patients have returned to their previous weight (4 patients were lost to follow-up evaluation).
CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of LAGB erosions in our series was 1.96%. This incidence fell with increasing experience to 0.5% after the initial 300 bands were excluded from the analysis (3 band erosions in the last 565 band insertions). However, further increases in incidence are likely with a longer follow-up period. The most common presentation was abdominal pain followed by weight regain and port-site sepsis. In the authors' hands, laparoscopic omental plugging and band removal through a separate anterior gastrotomy appear to be effective methods for dealing with band erosions. Band erosion is a significant source of morbidity, with at least one-third of the erosion patients in our series not achieving their final goal of weight loss despite appropriate treatment. This study highlights the need for a future prospective randomized study to clarify the apparent strong influence of band design and construction on the etiopathogenesis of band erosion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20177941     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-0899-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  Adjustable gastric banding: advantages and disadvantages.

Authors:  M Lucchese; F Alessio; A Valeri; G Cantelli; F Venneri; D Borrelli
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Adjustable silicone gastric banding and band erosion: personal experience and hypotheses.

Authors:  E Meir; M Van Baden
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  2000

4.  Band erosion and passage, causing small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Marco Bueter; Andreas Thalheimer; Detlef Meyer; Martin Fein
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Silicone-adjustable gastric banding: disappointing results.

Authors:  A Westling; K Bjurling; M Ohrvall; S Gustavsson
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Treatment of intra-gastric band migration following laparoscopic banding: safety and feasibility of simultaneous laparoscopic band removal and replacement.

Authors:  Subhi Abu-Abeid; Dan Bar Zohar; Boaz Sagie; Joseph Klausner
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  The clinical spectrum of band erosion following laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for morbid obesity.

Authors:  S Abu-Abeid; A Keidar; N Gavert; A Blanc; A Szold
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Uncommon intragastric migration of the Swedish adjustable gastric band.

Authors:  Reinhard P Mittermair; Helmut Weiss; Hermann Nehoda; Franz Aigner
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  The obesity epidemic, metabolic syndrome and future prevention strategies.

Authors:  Philip T James; Neville Rigby; Rachel Leach
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2004-02

10.  Hypovolemic shock due to intragastric migration of an adjustable gastric band.

Authors:  Josemberg Campos; Almino Ramos; Manoel Galvão Neto; Luciana Siqueira; Luis Fernando Evangelista; Alvaro Ferraz; Edmundo Ferraz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.129

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure after adjustable gastric band--a systematic review.

Authors:  Usha K Coblijn; Caroline J Verveld; Bart A van Wagensveld; Sjoerd M Lagarde
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  The role of endoscopy in the bariatric surgery patient.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Cardiogastric Fistula as a Rare Complication After Gastric Banding and Hiatal Hernia Surgery.

Authors:  Raquel Alfonso Ballester; Mari Carmen Fernández Moreno; María Lapeña Rodríguez; Rosa Martí Fernández; José Villegas Morera; Norberto Cassinello Fernández; Joaquín Ortega Serrano
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Intragastric gastric band migration: erosion: an analysis of multicenter experience on 177 patients.

Authors:  Nicola Di Lorenzo; Michele Lorenzo; Francesco Furbetta; Franco Favretti; Cristiano Giardiello; Sergio Boschi; Genco Alfredo; Giancarlo Micheletto; Vincenzo Borrelli; Augusto Veneziani; Marcello Lucchese; Marcello Boni; Simona Civitelli; Ida Camperchioli; Vincenzo Pilone; Maurizio De Luca; Paolo De Meis; Massimiliano Cipriano; Michele Paganelli; Vincenzo Mancuso; Angelo Gardinazzi; Angelo Schettino; Roberta Maselli; Pietro Forestieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Minimally invasive endogastric removal of migrated gastric band after endoscopic failure: how I do it.

Authors:  A Doussot; M Poussier; C Combier; U Leung; M David; J-L Jouve; O Facy
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Management of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band erosion.

Authors:  Pablo Quadri; Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia; Mario Masrur; Lisa Sanchez-Johnsen; Enrique F Elli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Case Report of Successful Medical Management of Progressive Gastric Band Penetration-to-Perforation After Band Insertion at Bariatric Surgery: Documentation by 12 Serial EGDs During 50 months of Observation.

Authors:  Andrew M Aneese; Sung K Yang; Mitchell S Cappell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Concomitant Removal of Gastric Band and Gastric Bypass: Analysis of Outcomes and Complications from the ACS-NSQIP Database.

Authors:  Elie P Ramly; Bassem Y Safadi; Hanaa Dakour Aridi; Rami Kantar; Aurelie Mailhac; Ramzi S Alami
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  All bariatric surgeries are not created equal: insights from mechanistic comparisons.

Authors:  Margaret A Stefater; Hilary E Wilson-Pérez; Adam P Chambers; Darleen A Sandoval; Randy J Seeley
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 19.871

10.  Treatment of band erosion: feasibility and safety of endoscopic band removal.

Authors:  Enrico Mozzi; Ezio Lattuada; Marco Antonio Zappa; Paola Granelli; Fausto De Ruberto; Anna Armocida; Giancarlo Roviaro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.