Literature DB >> 20177280

Adherence and acceptability of the contraceptive ring compared with the pill among students: a randomized controlled trial.

Melissa L Gilliam1, Amy Neustadt, Michael Kozloski, Stephanie Mistretta, Sandra Tilmon, Emily Godfrey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare satisfaction with and adherence to the contraceptive vaginal ring and a daily low-dose oral contraceptive pill (OCP) among college and graduate students using a novel method of electronic data collection.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 273 women to the contraceptive vaginal ring (n=136) or OCP (n=137) for three consecutive menstrual cycles. Participants completed daily Internet-based, online diaries regarding method adherence and satisfaction during cycles of use. At 3 months, they completed an online survey regarding intention to continue their method and overall acceptability. At 6 months, we surveyed participants to see whether they continued using contraception and, if so, which method.
RESULTS: Rates of loss to follow-up were similar between groups. Contraceptive vaginal ring users reported more perfect use in the first 2 months (P=.05). After the 3-month study period, 52 (43%) of 121 contraceptive vaginal ring users and 65 (52%) of 126 OCP users reported plans to continue their method (P=.16). However, at 6 months, only 31 (26%) of 117 contraceptive vaginal ring users and 36 (29%) of 123 OCP users had continued their assigned study method (P=.61). Almost 50% of both groups were using condoms or no method.
CONCLUSION: Contraceptive vaginal ring users were more likely to report perfect use during the 3-month trial period than were OCP users. Despite randomization, participants were equally satisfied with their assigned hormonal contraceptive method. At 6 months, less than 30% of participants were still using their assigned method. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00635570.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20177280     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cf45dc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  20 in total

1.  Evidence-based guidance on Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use: identification of research gaps.

Authors:  Suzanne G Folger; Denise J Jamieson; Emily M Godfrey; Lauren B Zapata; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  A Qualitative Systematic Review of Women's Experiences Using Contraceptive Vaginal Rings: Implications for New Technologies.

Authors:  Sara E Vargas; Miriam M Midoun; Melissa Guillen; Melissa L Getz; Kristen Underhill; Caroline Kuo; Kate M Guthrie
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2019-05-20

3.  Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Jenifer E Allsworth; Emiko Petrosky; Tessa Madden; David Eisenberg; Gina Secura
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Understanding prescription adherence: pharmacy claims data from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.

Authors:  Meredith E Pittman; Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Juell B Homco; Tessa Madden; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 5.  Contraception for HIV-Infected Adolescents.

Authors:  Athena P Kourtis; Ayesha Mirza
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Evaluating the Whoops Proof S.C. Campaign: A Pair-Matched Group Pretest-Posttest Quasi-experimental Study.

Authors:  Beth Sundstrom; Deborah Billings; Ellie Smith; Merissa Ferrara; Bill Albert; Katherine Suellentrop
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-08

7.  Qualitative Analysis of Sexually Experienced Female Adolescents: Attitudes about Vaginal Health.

Authors:  Jenny K R Francis; Lauren Dapena Fraiz; Marina Catallozzi; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 1.814

Review 8.  Skin patch and vaginal ring versus combined oral contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; David A Grimes; Maria F Gallo; Laurie L Stockton; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-04-30

9.  Sequential compression devices in postoperative urologic patients: an observational trial and survey study on the influence of patient and hospital factors on compliance.

Authors:  David F Ritsema; Jennifer M Watson; Amanda P Stiteler; Mike M Nguyen
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 10.  Hormonal and intrauterine methods for contraception for women aged 25 years and younger.

Authors:  Jamie Krashin; Jennifer H Tang; Sheila Mody; Laureen M Lopez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.