Literature DB >> 2017722

A dialogue between practitioners of alternative (traditional) medicine and modern (western) medicine in Norway.

V M Christie1.   

Abstract

This paper tells about a 'dialogue group', consisting of alternative and modern health practitioners, that was started in Norway in 1989, how it works and what has been achieved up to now. WHO has strongly advocated promotion of cooperation between traditional and modern health practitioners. In Botswana, where one of the general practitioners in the group has practiced, 'United Health Committees' have been established aiming at creating a dialogue between the different types of health professionals. In industrialized countries little seems to have been done so far. Many patients in Norway, as in many other countries, consult ordinary doctors as well as alternative practitioners. In Norway, members of these two professions almost never meet, other than as opponents. They receive information about each other mostly through discontented patients who have been unsuccessfully treated by the other part. In this way practitioners get an insufficient and biased report of one another's practices, as well as an unrealistic and distorted picture. If patients know that both parts respect one another, then most of them dare to tell that they use both types of practitioners. Otherwise many patients conceal this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2017722     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90289-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  2 in total

1.  Relationships among older patients, CAM practitioners, and physicians: the advantages of qualitative inquiry.

Authors:  Shelley R Adler
Journal:  Altern Ther Health Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.305

2.  Traditional Native healing. Alternative or adjunct to modern medicine?

Authors:  E M Zubek
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.275

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.