Literature DB >> 20177019

Cross-sectional study of imatinib plasma trough levels in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: impact of gastrointestinal resection on exposure to imatinib.

Changhoon Yoo1, Min-Hee Ryu, Byung Woog Kang, Shin-Kyo Yoon, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Heung-Moon Chang, Jae-Lyun Lee, Mo Youl Beck, Tae Won Kim, Yoon-Koo Kang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Imatinib plasma trough levels (C(min)) have been reported to correlate with treatment outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). We therefore have evaluated the correlation between imatinib C(min) and the clinical characteristics of patients with GIST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Steady-state imatinib C(min) in 107 patients with GIST who were taking imatinib 300 to 800 mg/d was measured.
RESULTS: In patients treated with imatinib 400 (n = 92), 300 (n = 7), 600 (n = 2), or 800 (n = 11) mg/d, imatinib C(min) was 1,305 +/- 633 ng/mL, 1,452 +/- 830 ng/mL, 1,698 +/- 725 ng/mL, and 3,330 +/- 1,592 ng/mL, respectively. Of the 92 patients treated with 400 mg/d imatinib, 59 patients (63%) were men; the median age was 55 years (range, 28 to 76 years), and the median duration of imatinib use before sampling was 8.8 months (range, 0.5 to 67.6 months). The mean inter- and intrapatient variability rates were 44.7% and 26.5%, respectively. In univariate analyses, high C(min) was correlated with advanced age (P = .02), low creatinine clearance (P = .001), low hemoglobin (P = .03), and low albumin (P < .001) concentrations. Imatinib C(min) was also significantly lower in patients with (n = 18; 942 +/- 330 ng/mL) than without (n = 74; 1,393 +/- 659 ng/mL) major (ie, total or subtotal) gastrectomy (P = .002). In multivariate analysis, albumin (P = .001) concentrations, creatinine clearance (P = .002), and major gastrectomy (P = .003) were significantly correlated with C(min).
CONCLUSION: In patients with GIST, imatinib C(min) at steady state was significantly associated with albumin concentration, creatinine clearance, and previous major gastrectomy. Although its clinical impact is unclear at present time, monitoring of imatinib C(min) might be particularly important for optimal treatment with imatinib in patients who have undergone major gastrectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20177019     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.5785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  31 in total

Review 1.  Correlations between imatinib pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, adherence, and clinical response in advanced metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): an emerging role for drug blood level testing?

Authors:  Margaret von Mehren; Nicolas Widmer
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 12.111

2.  Imatinib Pharmacokinetics in a Large Observational Cohort of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour Patients.

Authors:  Sheima Farag; Remy B Verheijen; J Martijn Kerst; Annemiek Cats; Alwin D R Huitema; Neeltje Steeghs
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Incidental Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) and Bariatric Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  J A Fernández; M D Frutos; J J Ruiz-Manzanera
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Changes in imatinib plasma trough level during long-term treatment of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: correlation between changes in covariates and imatinib exposure.

Authors:  Changhoon Yoo; Min-Hee Ryu; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; Mo Youl Beck; Heung-Moon Chang; Jae-Lyun Lee; Tae Won Kim; Yoon-Koo Kang
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge.

Authors:  J A Fernández; M D Frutos; J J Ruiz-Manzanera; A Navarro; G Torres; T Soria
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of the Oral Absorption Process and Explaining Intra-Subject Variability in Plasma Exposures of Imatinib in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Ali-Akbar Golabchifar; Saeed Rezaee; Nahid Mobarghei Dinan; Abbas Kebriaeezadeh; Mohammad-Reza Rouini
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.441

7.  Optimizing the dose in cancer patients treated with imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib.

Authors:  Nienke A G Lankheet; Ingrid M E Desar; Sasja F Mulder; David M Burger; Dinemarie M Kweekel; Carla M L van Herpen; Winette T A van der Graaf; Nielka P van Erp
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Systematic review of drug bioavailability following gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Manuela Moreno Santamaría; José Javier Arenas Villafranca; Jimena Abilés; Alberto Fernández López; Lucia Visiedo Rodas; Begoña Tortajada Goitia; Pilar Utrilla Navarro
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Does a glass of Coke boost the exposure to imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumour patients after gastrectomy?

Authors:  Floor J E Lubberman; Hans Gelderblom; Carli M Wilmer; Dina M Kweekel; Ingrid M E Desar; Angela Colbers; David Burger; Winette T A van der Graaf; Nielka van Erp
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of imatinib dose escalation to 800 mg/day in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Changhoon Yoo; Min-Hee Ryu; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; Mo Youl Beck; Yoon-Koo Kang
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.