Literature DB >> 20176986

Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in women with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein or dyslipidemia: results from the Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) and meta-analysis of women from primary prevention trials.

Samia Mora1, Robert J Glynn, Judith Hsia, Jean G MacFadyen, Jacques Genest, Paul M Ridker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Statin therapy in women without cardiovascular disease (CVD) is controversial, given the insufficient evidence of benefit. We analyzed sex-specific outcomes in the Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) and synthesized the results with prior trials. METHODS AND
RESULTS: JUPITER participants included 6801 women > or =60 years of age and 11 001 men > or =50 years of age with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein > or =2 mg/L and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <130 mg/dL randomized to rosuvastatin versus placebo. Meta-analysis studies were randomized placebo-controlled statin trials with predominantly or exclusively primary prevention in women and sex-specific outcomes (20 147 women; >276 CVD events; mean age, 63 to 69 years). Absolute CVD rates (per 100 person-years) in JUPITER women for rosuvastatin and placebo (0.57 and 1.04, respectively) were lower than for men (0.88 and 1.54, respectively), with similar relative risk reduction in women (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.80; P=0.002) and men (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 0.73; P<0.001). In women, there was significant reduction in revascularization/unstable angina and nonsignificant reductions in other components of the primary end point. Meta-analysis of 13 154 women (240 CVD events; 216 total deaths) from exclusively primary prevention trials found a significant reduction in primary CVD events with statins by a third (relative risk, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.49 to 0.82; P<0.001; P for heterogeneity=0.56) with a smaller nonsignificant effect on total mortality (relative risk, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 1.15; P=0.21; P for heterogeneity=0.20). Similar results were obtained for trials that were predominantly but not exclusively primary prevention.
CONCLUSIONS: JUPITER demonstrated that in primary prevention rosuvastatin reduced CVD events in women with a relative risk reduction similar to that in men, a finding supported by meta-analysis of primary prevention statin trials. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00239681.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20176986      PMCID: PMC4439924          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.906479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  23 in total

Review 1.  Calculating the number needed to treat for trials where the outcome is time to an event.

Authors:  D G Altman; P K Andersen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-12-04

Review 2.  Rosuvastatin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease among patients with low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: rationale and design of the JUPITER trial.

Authors:  Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases with statin therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan; Akshay Bagai; M Alan Brookhart; Niteesh K Choudhry
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-11-27

4.  Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with pravastatin in Japan (MEGA Study): a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Haruo Nakamura; Kikuo Arakawa; Hiroshige Itakura; Akira Kitabatake; Yoshio Goto; Takayoshi Toyota; Noriaki Nakaya; Shoji Nishimoto; Masaharu Muranaka; Akira Yamamoto; Kyoichi Mizuno; Yasuo Ohashi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The gender-specific impact of diabetes and myocardial infarction at baseline and during follow-up on mortality from all causes and coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Gang Hu; Pekka Jousilahti; Qing Qiao; Markku Peltonen; Shuichi Katoh; Jaakko Tuomilehto
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS): efficacy and tolerability of long-term treatment with lovastatin in women.

Authors:  M Clearfield; J R Downs; S Weis; E J Whitney; W Kruyer; D R Shapiro; E A Stein; A Langendorfer; P A Beere; A M Gotto
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2001-12

7.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Drug treatment of hyperlipidemia in women.

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; Michael Pignone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study.

Authors:  J R Downs; M Clearfield; S Weis; E Whitney; D R Shapiro; P A Beere; A Langendorfer; E A Stein; W Kruyer; A M Gotto
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  J Shepherd; S M Cobbe; I Ford; C G Isles; A R Lorimer; P W MacFarlane; J H McKillop; C J Packard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  80 in total

Review 1.  Bias in observational studies of prevalent users: lessons for comparative effectiveness research from a meta-analysis of statins.

Authors:  Goodarz Danaei; Mohammad Tavakkoli; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Estrogen implants: embodiments of deeper problems in the marketing of drugs.

Authors:  Gordon Schiff; Judy Norsigian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Clinician-patient risk discussion for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention: importance to implementation of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines.

Authors:  Seth S Martin; Laurence S Sperling; Michael J Blaha; Peter W F Wilson; Ty J Gluckman; Roger S Blumenthal; Neil J Stone
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Effects of statins on the immunoglobulin G glycome.

Authors:  Toma Keser; Frano Vučković; Clara Barrios; Jonas Zierer; Annika Wahl; Akintunde O Akinkuolie; Jerko Štambuk; Natali Nakić; Tamara Pavić; Josipa Periša; Samia Mora; Christian Gieger; Cristina Menni; Tim D Spector; Olga Gornik; Gordan Lauc
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.770

5.  Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Women.

Authors:  Rebeccah A McKibben; Mahmoud Al Rifai; Lena M Mathews; Erin D Michos
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep       Date:  2015-12-29

Review 6.  Statins in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Željko Reiner
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  Statins in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women: facts and myths.

Authors:  Salim S Virani
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

8.  Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Women Beyond Statin Therapy: New Insights 2020.

Authors:  Lori Mosca; Ann Marie Navar; Nanette Kass Wenger
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  [Sex- and gender-aspects in regard to clinical practice recommendations for pre-diabetes and diabetes].

Authors:  Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Raimund Weitgasser; Peter Fasching; Fritz Hoppichler; Monika Lechleitner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 10.  Moving beyond JUPITER: will inhibiting inflammation reduce vascular event rates?

Authors:  Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.