Literature DB >> 20176664

Genetic screening: a conceptual framework for programmes and policy-making.

Anne Andermann1, Ingeborg Blancquaert, Véronique Déry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Policy-makers are faced with increasing pressures from a range of different stakeholders to introduce or expand genetic screening programmes. A shared understanding is therefore needed of the many factors influencing these complex policy decisions. Our aim was to develop a theoretical framework that highlights the multiple components and influences involved in genetic screening and the policy-making process.
METHODS: As part of a larger research programme, existing policy frameworks relating to genetic screening were identified through a review of the literature. Major themes were identified and synthesized into an overarching framework, which was further refined through discussions with key informants.
RESULTS: The framework consists of three parts. The first part conceptualizes genetic screening as an integrated public health programme. The second part describes the policy-making process at each stage in the life cycle of the programme. The third part depicts the broader context within which policy-making occurs.
CONCLUSION: This framework can support policy-makers by fostering a common understanding and facilitating dialogue with stakeholders. The framework has also been used as the conceptual foundation for the development of a more elaborate decision-guide.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20176664     DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  7 in total

Review 1.  Genetic screening: A primer for primary care.

Authors:  Anne Andermann; Ingeborg Blancquaert
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Evaluation after five years of the cancer genetic counselling programme of Valencian Community (Eastern Spain).

Authors:  Dolores Cuevas-Cuerda; Dolores Salas-Trejo
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Risk-Adjusted Cancer Screening and Prevention (RiskAP): Complementing Screening for Early Disease Detection by a Learning Screening Based on Risk Factors.

Authors:  Rita K Schmutzler; Björn Schmitz-Luhn; Bettina Borisch; Peter Devilee; Diana Eccles; Per Hall; Judith Balmaña; Stefania Boccia; Peter Dabrock; Günter Emons; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Jacek Gronwald; Stefanie Houwaart; Stefan Huster; Karin Kast; Alexander Katalinic; Sabine C Linn; Sowmiya Moorthie; Paul Pharoah; Kerstin Rhiem; Tade Spranger; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Johannes Jozef Marten van Delden; Marc van den Bulcke; Christiane Woopen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 2.268

Review 4.  Ethical considerations in gene selection for reproductive carrier screening.

Authors:  Lisa Dive; Alison Dalton Archibald; Ainsley J Newson
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 5.881

5.  Outcomes of an International Workshop on Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening: Some Considerations for Governments.

Authors:  Caron M Molster; Karla Lister; Selina Metternick-Jones; Gareth Baynam; Angus John Clarke; Volker Straub; Hugh J S Dawkins; Nigel Laing
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-02-24

6.  How is genetic testing evaluated? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Erica Pitini; Corrado De Vito; Carolina Marzuillo; Elvira D'Andrea; Annalisa Rosso; Antonio Federici; Emilio Di Maria; Paolo Villari
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Evaluating genomic tests from bench to bedside: a practical framework.

Authors:  Jennifer S Lin; Matthew Thompson; Katrina A B Goddard; Margaret A Piper; Carl Heneghan; Evelyn P Whitlock
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.