Literature DB >> 20175874

A randomised trial of a retropubic tension-free vaginal tape versus a mini-sling for stress incontinence.

M Basu1, J Duckett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare a mini-sling with a retropubic tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urodynamic stress incontinence (USI).
DESIGN: Randomised trial.
SETTING: Urogynaecology unit in large UK district general hospital. POPULATION: Women with USI resistant to conservative management and requiring a suburethral sling.
METHODS: A total of 71 women with SUI and confirmed USI were randomised to undergo treatment with either a retropubic TVT or mini-sling. Follow-up was at 6 weeks, with a history, examination and quality of life questionnaire, and at 6 months with further subjective evaluation and twin-channel subtraction cystometry and pressure-flow studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The presence of SUI at 6 weeks and 6 months after treatment.
RESULTS: The mini-sling was associated with a significantly higher rate of persistent SUI at 6 weeks (OR 9.49, 95% CI 2.8-32.6) and 6 months (OR 8.14, 95% CI 2.7-24.7), and of USI at 6 months (OR 7.58, 95% CI 2.7-24.7). The rate of complication was similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The mini-sling is associated with a higher failure rate than a retropubic TVT. Longer term and multicentre outcome data are necessary to explore these findings further. Until this is available, the mini-sling should be used with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20175874     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02513.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  13 in total

1.  The original versus a modified inside-out transobturator procedure: 1-year results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Jean de Leval; Alexandre Thomas; David Waltregny
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Arjun Nambiar; June D Cody; Stephen T Jeffery; Patricia Aluko
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-26

3.  Miniarc single-incision sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 2-year clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Michael J Kennelly; Robert Moore; John N Nguyen; James Lukban; Steven Siegel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Short-term outcomes with the Ajust™ system: a new single incision sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Michele Meschia; Pietro Barbacini; Roberto Baccichet; Arturo Buonaguidi; Marco Maffiolini; Luisa Ricci; Chiara Braghin; Valentina Brusati; Chiara Dell'Utri; Lorenzo Spreafico
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  A cohort study comparing a single-incision sling with a retropubic midurethral sling.

Authors:  Annetta M Madsen; Sherif A El-Nashar; Joshua L Woelk; Christopher J Klingele; John B Gebhart; Emanuel C Trabuco
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Three-year results from a randomised trial of a retropubic mid-urethral sling versus the Miniarc single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Maya Basu; Jonathan Duckett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Safety and efficacy of single-incision sling for female stress urinary incontinence: 3 years' results.

Authors:  Güner Yildiz; Yasin Ceylan; Oktay Ucer; Deniz Arslan; Orçun Çelik; Bülent Gunlusoy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Short-term outcomes of Altis single-incision sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence: a prospective single-center study.

Authors:  Jorge Dias; Luís Xambre; Luís Costa; Pedro Costa; Luís Ferraz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Transobturator versus single incision slings: 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Aimee L Tieu; Aparna Hegde; Peter A Castillo; G Willy Davila; Vivian C Aguilar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 10.  Non-compliance with randomised allocation and missing outcome data in randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Temitope E Adewuyi; Graeme MacLennan; Jonathan A Cook
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-09-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.