BACKGROUND: The 2005 guidelines of the American Thoracic Society-Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines for Hospital for managing hospital-acquired pneumonia classified patients according to time of onset and risk factors for potentially drug-resistant microorganisms to select the empirical antimicrobial treatment. We assessed the microbial prediction and validated the adequacy of these guidelines for antibiotic strategy. METHODS: We prospectively observed 276 patients with intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia. We classified patients into group 1 (early onset without risk factors for potentially drug-resistant microorganisms; 38 patients) and group 2 (late onset or risk factors for potentially drug-resistant microorganisms; 238 patients). We determined the accuracy of guidelines to predict causative microorganisms and the influence of guidelines adherence in patients' outcome. RESULTS: Microbial prediction was lower in group 1 than in group 2 (12 [50%] of 24 vs 119 [92%] of 129; P < .001) mainly because of potentially drug-resistant microorganisms in 10 patients (26%) from group 1. Guideline adherence was higher in group 2 (153 [64%] vs 7 [18%]; P < .001). Guideline adherence resulted in more treatment adequacy than did nonadherence (69 [83%] vs 45 [64%]; P = .013) and a trend toward better response to empirical treatment in group 2 only but did not influence mortality. Reclassifying patients according to the risk factors for potentially drug-resistant microorganisms of the former 1996 American Thoracic Society guidelines increased microbial prediction in group 1 to 21 (88%; P = .014); all except 1 patient with potentially drug-resistant microorganisms were correctly identified by these guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The 2005 guidelines predict potentially drug-resistant microorganisms worse than the 1996 guidelines. Adherence to guidelines resulted in more adequate treatment and a trend to a better clinical response in group 2, but it did not influence mortality.
BACKGROUND: The 2005 guidelines of the American Thoracic Society-Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines for Hospital for managing hospital-acquired pneumonia classified patients according to time of onset and risk factors for potentially drug-resistant microorganisms to select the empirical antimicrobial treatment. We assessed the microbial prediction and validated the adequacy of these guidelines for antibiotic strategy. METHODS: We prospectively observed 276 patients with intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia. We classified patients into group 1 (early onset without risk factors for potentially drug-resistant microorganisms; 38 patients) and group 2 (late onset or risk factors for potentially drug-resistant microorganisms; 238 patients). We determined the accuracy of guidelines to predict causative microorganisms and the influence of guidelines adherence in patients' outcome. RESULTS: Microbial prediction was lower in group 1 than in group 2 (12 [50%] of 24 vs 119 [92%] of 129; P < .001) mainly because of potentially drug-resistant microorganisms in 10 patients (26%) from group 1. Guideline adherence was higher in group 2 (153 [64%] vs 7 [18%]; P < .001). Guideline adherence resulted in more treatment adequacy than did nonadherence (69 [83%] vs 45 [64%]; P = .013) and a trend toward better response to empirical treatment in group 2 only but did not influence mortality. Reclassifying patients according to the risk factors for potentially drug-resistant microorganisms of the former 1996 American Thoracic Society guidelines increased microbial prediction in group 1 to 21 (88%; P = .014); all except 1 patient with potentially drug-resistant microorganisms were correctly identified by these guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The 2005 guidelines predict potentially drug-resistant microorganisms worse than the 1996 guidelines. Adherence to guidelines resulted in more adequate treatment and a trend to a better clinical response in group 2, but it did not influence mortality.
Authors: Andrea Endimiani; Kristine M Hujer; Andrea M Hujer; Sebastian Kurz; Michael R Jacobs; David S Perlin; Robert A Bonomo Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Maria Deja; Despoina Koulenti; George Dimopoulos; Brian Marsh; Antonio Torres; Michael S Niederman; Jordi Rello Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Gaëtane C Michaud; Colleen L Channick; Anica C Law; Jessica B McCannon; MaryEllen Antkowiak; Garth Garrison; David Sayah; Richard H Huynh; Anna K Brady; Rosemary Adamson; Hilary DuBrock; Praveen Akuthota; Chad Marion; Charles Dela Cruz; James A Town; Başak Çoruh; Carey C Thomson Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2016-07
Authors: Julie E Mangino; Paula Peyrani; Kimbal D Ford; Daniel H Kett; Marcus J Zervos; Verna L Welch; Ernesto G Scerpella; Julio A Ramirez Journal: Crit Care Date: 2011-01-25 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Lieuwe D Bos; Pedro Povoa; Paula Ramirez; Marcus J Schultz; Antoni Torres; Antonio Artigas Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp Date: 2015-09-16
Authors: Raymond M Khan; Maha Aljuaid; Hanan Aqeel; Mohammed M Aboudeif; Shaimaa Elatwey; Rajeh Shehab; Yasser Mandourah; Khalid Maghrabi; Hassan Hawa; Imran Khalid; Ismael Qushmaq; Asad Latif; Bickey Chang; Sean M Berenholtz; Sultan Tayar; Khloud Al-Harbi; Amin Yousef; Anas A Amr; Yaseen M Arabi Journal: Ann Thorac Med Date: 2017 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.219