Literature DB >> 20175617

Places and faces: Geographic environment influences the ingroup memory advantage.

Nicholas O Rule1, James V Garrett, Nalini Ambady.   

Abstract

The preferential allocation of attention and memory to the ingroup (the ingroup memory advantage) is one of the most replicated effects in the psychological literature. But little is known about what factors may influence such effects. Here the authors investigated a potential influence: category salience as determined by the perceiver's geographic environment. They did so by studying the ingroup memory advantage in perceptually ambiguous groups for whom perceptual cues do not make group membership immediately salient. Individuals in an environment in which a particular group membership was salient (Mormon and non-Mormon men and women living in Salt Lake City, Utah) showed better memory for faces belonging to their ingroup in an incidental encoding paradigm. Majority group participants in an environment where this group membership was not salient (non-Mormon men and women in the northeastern United States), however, showed no ingroup memory advantage whereas minority group participants (Mormons) in the same environment did. But in the same environment, when differences in group membership were made accessible via an unobtrusive priming task, non-Mormons did show an ingroup memory advantage and Mormons' memory for ingroup members increased. Environmental context cues therefore influence the ingroup memory advantage for categories that are not intrinsically salient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20175617     DOI: 10.1037/a0018589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  7 in total

1.  Inter-Group Face Recognition Bias Was Modulated by the Group Status.

Authors:  Bingjie Hu; Linlin Yan; Chengyan Zheng; Yuhao Tang; Qiuye Lin; Wenling Xia; Zhe Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  On the perception of religious group membership from faces.

Authors:  Nicholas O Rule; James V Garrett; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Similarity hypothesis: understanding of others with autism spectrum disorders by individuals with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Hidetsugu Komeda
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Perceptions of others' political affiliation are moderated by individual perceivers' own political attitudes.

Authors:  John Paul Wilson; Nicholas O Rule
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Own-Group Face Recognition Bias: The Effects of Location and Reputation.

Authors:  Linlin Yan; Zhe Wang; Jianling Huang; Yu-Hao P Sun; Rebecca A Judges; Naiqi G Xiao; Kang Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-10

6.  Democrats and republicans can be differentiated from their faces.

Authors:  Nicholas O Rule; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Differences in anticipated interaction drive own group biases in face memory.

Authors:  John Paul Wilson; Pirita E See; Michael J Bernstein; Kurt Hugenberg; Christopher Chartier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.