Literature DB >> 20175498

On the scattering power of radiotherapy protons.

Bernard Gottschalk1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: First, to show that accurate formulas for scattering power T must take into account the competition between the Gaussian core and the single scattering tail of the angular distribution, which affects the rate of change in the Gaussian width and leads to the single scattering correction (SSC). Second, to show that the SSC requires that T(x) be nonlocal: Besides material properties and energy at the point of interest, it must depend in some fashion on how much multiple scattering has already taken place. Third, after reviewing five previous formulas (three local and two nonlocal), to derive an improved "differential Molière" formula T(dM). Last, to investigate, by studying some practical cases, when an accurate formula for T is actually needed.
METHODS: We first take the numerical derivative of the Molière/Fano/Hanson (theta2) in order to find the true SSC. We simplify the formula for T(IC) (ICRU Report 35) for protons, introducing a new material dependent property, the "scattering length" X(s), analogous to radiation length X(0). We then use T(IC) as a basis for T(dM) by including a nonlocal correction factor fdM which, by virtue of the Øverås approximation, parametrizes the single scattering correction.
RESULTS: The improved scattering power is T(dM)[triple band]f(dM)(pv,p1v1) x (E(s)/pv)(2)1/X(s) where fdM 0.5244+0.1975 lg(1-(pv/p1v1)2)+0.2320 lg(pv)-0.0098 lg(pv)lg(1-(pv/p1v1)2), P1v1 (MeV) is the initial product of proton momentum and speed, pv is the same at the point of interest, and E(s) = 15.0 MeV. T(dM) is easily computed and generalizes readily to mixed slabs because fdM is not material dependent.
CONCLUSIONS: Whether an accurate formula for T is required depends very much on the problem at hand. For beam spreading in water, five of the six formulas for T give almost identical results, suggesting that patient dose calculations are insensitive to T. That is not true, however, of beam spreading in Pb. At the opposite extreme, the projected rms beam width at the end of a Pb/Lexan/air stack, analogous to the upstream modulator in a passive beam spreading system, is sensitive to T. In this case a simple experiment would discriminate between all but two of the six formulas discussed. Scattering power applies as much to Monte Carlo as to deterministic transport calculations. Using T in any of its forms will avoid step size dependence. Using the best available T could be important in general purpose Monte Carlo codes, which are expected to give the correct answer to many different problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20175498     DOI: 10.1118/1.3264177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  An MCNPX Monte Carlo model of a discrete spot scanning proton beam therapy nozzle.

Authors:  Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Dragan Mirkovic; Luis A Perles; Narayan Sahoo; X Ron Zhu; George Ciangaru; Kazumichi Suzuki; Michael T Gillin; Radhe Mohan; Uwe Titt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A generalized 2D pencil beam scaling algorithm for proton dose calculation in heterogeneous slab geometries.

Authors:  David C Westerly; Xiaohu Mo; Wolfgang A Tomé; Thomas R Mackie; Paul M DeLuca
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Impact of range shifter material on proton pencil beam spot characteristics.

Authors:  Jiajian Shen; Wei Liu; Aman Anand; Joshua B Stoker; Xiaoning Ding; Mirek Fatyga; Michael G Herman; Martin Bues
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  COMPARISON OF PARTICLE-TRACKING FEATURES IN GEANT4 AND MCNPX CODES FOR APPLICATIONS IN MAPPING OF PROTON RANGE UNCERTAINTY.

Authors:  Bryan Bednarz; Gty Chen; Harald Paganetti; Bin Han; Aiping Ding; X George Xu
Journal:  Nucl Technol       Date:  2011-07

Review 5.  The physics of proton therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  An inhomogeneous most likely path formalism for proton computed tomography.

Authors:  Mark D Brooke; Scott N Penfold
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 7.  Range Verification Methods in Particle Therapy: Underlying Physics and Monte Carlo Modeling.

Authors:  Aafke Christine Kraan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  An approximate analytical solution of the Bethe equation for charged particles in the radiotherapeutic energy range.

Authors:  David Robert Grimes; Daniel R Warren; Mike Partridge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.