Literature DB >> 20175345

Randomized trial of oral misoprostol before endometrial biopsy.

Joan M G Crane1, Catherine Craig2, Lesa Dawson1, Teresa O'Grady1, Elias Bartellas1, Donna Hutchens1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the use of oral misoprostol in women undergoing endometrial biopsy reduces procedural discomfort.
METHODS: Women undergoing endometrial biopsy were randomized to receive either 400 microg misoprostol or a vitamin B6 placebo orally 12 hours prior to the procedure, and were stratified based on menopausal status. The primary outcome was procedural discomfort on a visual analogue scale (0-10). Secondary outcomes included the need to dilate the cervix or use a tenaculum, and side effects. Subgroup analyses were planned for premenopausal and postmenopausal women separately. Sample size calculation was based on detecting a 50% reduction in pain, with alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.10, in the premenopausal group.
RESULTS: A total of 72 women (49 premenopausal and 23 postmenopausal) were enrolled; 35 received misoprostol (23 premenopausal and 12 postmenopausal) and 37 received placebo (26 premenopausal and 11 postmenopausal). There were no significant differences in procedural discomfort (misoprostol vs. placebo 5.8 +/- 2.9 vs. 5.5 +/- 3.2, P = 0.77; premenopausal women 4.9 +/- 3.3 vs. 5.1 +/- 3.1, P = 0.85; postmenopausal women 7.1 +/- 1.9 vs. 7.1 +/- 2.3, P = 0.99), need to dilate the cervix (6.1% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.93) or use a tenaculum (44.1% vs. 48.6%, P = 0.70). Significantly more women in the misoprostol group experienced nausea (31.4% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.001), diarrhea (20.0% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.02), abdominal pain (22.9% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.03), menstrual-like cramping (42.9% vs. 2.7%, P < 0.001) and vaginal bleeding (11.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: The use of 400 microg oral misoprostol 12 hours prior to endometrial biopsy did not reduce procedural discomfort and was associated with more side effects than use of placebo. This finding was noted in all women as well as among subgroups of premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20175345     DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34351-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  2 in total

Review 1.  Intrauterine anesthesia for gynecologic procedures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca J Mercier; Matthew L Zerden
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Effectiveness of Intrauterine Lignocaine in Addition to Paracervical Block for Pain Relief during Dilatation and Curettage, and Fractional Curettage.

Authors:  Aashima Arora; Ajitabh Shukla; Subhas Chander Saha
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-01-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.