Literature DB >> 20174592

Psych verb production and comprehension in agrammatic Broca's aphasia.

Cynthia K Thompson1, Miseon Lee.   

Abstract

This study examined the factors that affect agrammatic sentence production by testing eight agrammatic aphasic participants' comprehension and production of active and passive sentences using two types of English psych verbs, those with an Experiencer-marked subject (Subject-Experiencer (SubExp)) and those with an Experiencer-marked object (Object-Experiencer (ObjExp)). The Argument Structure Complexity Hypothesis (ASCH, [J. Neuroling. 16 (2003) 151]) posits that the verb (and sentence) production difficulties observed in agrammatic aphasia can be attributed, at least in part, to the argument structure properties of verbs, with verbs that are marked for more complex argument structure (in terms of the number and type of arguments) presenting greater difficulty than those with less complex argument structure entries. Based on previous linguistic analyses of psych verbs, ObjExp psych verbs are more complex than SubjExp verbs. Therefore, we predicted that the former would present greater production (but not comprehension) difficulty than the latter. Results showed above chance comprehension of all sentence types, with the exception of SubjExp passive constructions, in which the subject position is occupied by a non-Experiencer argument. In active sentence production, ObjExp verbs were more impaired than SubjExp verbs. However, the opposite pattern was noted for passive sentence production. While all participants had difficulty producing passive sentences of both types, they showed better performance on ObjExp verbs, as compared to SubjExp verbs, in which the Experiencer is in the subject position. Further, agrammatic aphasic speakers showed a preference for producing actives for SubjExp verbs and passives for ObjExp verbs, indicating that the thematic role requirements of selected verbs (e.g., Experiencer, Theme) influence production patterns, as they do in normal speakers. These data, as well as the error patterns seen in our patients, support the ASCH and suggest that sentence production, disrupted in agrammatic aphasia, is impaired to a greater extent when the argument structure properties of the verb increase in complexity.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20174592      PMCID: PMC2824436          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurolinguistics        ISSN: 0911-6044            Impact factor:   1.710


  19 in total

1.  Verb retrieval in brain-damaged subjects: 1. Analysis of stimulus, lexical, and conceptual factors.

Authors:  D Kemmerer; D Tranel
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Patterns of comprehension and production of nouns and verbs in agrammatism: implications for lexical organization.

Authors:  M Kim; C K Thompson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia.

Authors:  D Caplan; C Baker; F Dehaut
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-11

4.  Agrammatic aphasic production and comprehension of unaccusative verbs in sentence contexts.

Authors:  Miseon Lee; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.710

5.  The interaction of preserved pragmatics and impaired syntax in Japanese and English aphasic speech.

Authors:  L Menn; K F Reilly; M Hayashi; A Kamio; I Fujita; S Sasanuma
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Levels of representation and units of access relevant to agrammatism.

Authors:  J Kegl
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  On the basis for the agrammatic's difficulty in producing main verbs.

Authors:  G Miceli; M C Silveri; G Villa; A Caramazza
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia.

Authors:  L B Zingeser; R S Berndt
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Why is a verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits.

Authors:  H Bird; D Howard; S Franklin
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Treating agrammatic aphasia within a linguistic framework: Treatment of Underlying Forms.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Lewis P Shapiro
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.773

View more
  12 in total

1.  Verb and sentence production and comprehension in aphasia: Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS).

Authors:  Soojin Cho-Reyes; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.773

2.  What Goes Wrong during Passive Sentence Production in Agrammatic Aphasia: An Eyetracking Study.

Authors:  Soojin Cho; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 2.773

3.  Psych verbs, the linking problem, and the acquisition of language.

Authors:  Joshua K Hartshorne; Timothy J O'Donnell; Yasutada Sudo; Miki Uruwashi; Miseon Lee; Jesse Snedeker
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-09-29

4.  Rasch models of aphasic performance on syntactic comprehension tests.

Authors:  Roee Gutman; Gayle DeDe; Jennifer Michaud; Jun S Liu; David Caplan
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Grammatical Encoding and Learning in Agrammatic Aphasia: Evidence from Structural Priming.

Authors:  Soojin Cho-Reyes; Jennifer E Mack; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  An analysis of topics and vocabulary in Chinese oral narratives by normal speakers and speakers with fluent aphasia.

Authors:  Sam-Po Law; Anthony Pak-Hin Kong; Christy Lai
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.346

7.  Effects of syntactic and semantic argument structure on sentence repetition in agrammatism: Things we can learn from particles and prepositions.

Authors:  Francine Kohen; Gary Milsark; Nadine Martin
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 2.773

8.  Effects of verb meaning on lexical integration in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Woohyuk Ji; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.710

9.  Love is hard to understand: the relationship between transitivity and caused events in the acquisition of emotion verbs.

Authors:  Joshua K Hartshorne; Amanda Pogue; Jesse Snedeker
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2014-06-19

Review 10.  A Systematic Review on methods of evaluate sentence production deficits in agrammatic aphasia patients: Validity and Reliability issues.

Authors:  Azar Mehri; Shohreh Jalaie
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.