ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are integral membrane proteins that translocate a diverse array of substrates across cell membranes. We present here the dynamics of complex formation of three structurally characterized ABC transporters-the BtuCD vitamin B(12) importer and MetNI d/l-methionine importer from Escherichia coli and the Hi1470/1 metal-chelate importer from Haemophilus influenzae-in complex with their cognate binding proteins. Similarly to other ABC importers, MetNI interacts with its binding protein with low affinity (K(d) approximately 10(-4) M). In contrast, BtuCD-BtuF and Hi1470/1-Hi1472 form stable, high-affinity complexes (K(d) approximately 10(-13) and 10(-9) M, respectively). In BtuCD-BtuF, vitamin B(12) accelerates the complex dissociation rate approximately 10(7)-fold, with ATP having an additional destabilizing effect. The findings presented here highlight substantial mechanistic differences between BtuCD-BtuF, and likely Hi1470/1-Hi1472, and the better-characterized maltose and related ABC transport systems, indicating that there is considerable mechanistic diversity within this large protein super-family.
ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are integral membrane proteins that translocate a diverse array of substrates across cell membranes. We present here the dynamics of complex formation of three structurally characterized ABC transporters-the BtuCDvitamin B(12) importer and MetNI d/l-methionine importer from Escherichia coli and the Hi1470/1 metal-chelate importer from Haemophilus influenzae-in complex with their cognate binding proteins. Similarly to other ABC importers, MetNI interacts with its binding protein with low affinity (K(d) approximately 10(-4) M). In contrast, BtuCD-BtuF and Hi1470/1-Hi1472 form stable, high-affinity complexes (K(d) approximately 10(-13) and 10(-9) M, respectively). In BtuCD-BtuF, vitamin B(12) accelerates the complex dissociation rate approximately 10(7)-fold, with ATP having an additional destabilizing effect. The findings presented here highlight substantial mechanistic differences between BtuCD-BtuF, and likely Hi1470/1-Hi1472, and the better-characterized maltose and related ABC transport systems, indicating that there is considerable mechanistic diversity within this large protein super-family.
ATP Binding Cassette (ABC) transporters are a ubiquitous super-family of
proteins present in all kingdoms of life1,2. These transporters couple the
energy of ATP hydrolysis to the translocation of a diverse array of substrates
across biological membranes. A large body of experimental evidence supports a
“two-state, alternating access” mechanistic model for ABC exporters
and importers3-6. In this model, ATP binding, hydrolysis, and product release drive the
conformational changes of the transporter between two major conformations: an
outward-facing conformation, in which the substrate-binding site is exposed to the
extracellular side of the membrane, and an inward-facing conformation that exposes
the binding site to the cytoplasm. Concerted with changes in the affinity of the
binding site towards the substrate, these conformational changes ensure net
substrate uptake by an importer, or net expulsion by an exporter.ABC transporters that import essential nutrients into cells depend on a high
affinity binding protein for their function7-9. The binding protein acts as a
substrate chaperone that shuttles back and forth from the periplasm to the
transporter to deliver substrate molecules. The integration of the binding protein
into the above-mentioned “two-state” model is such that a
substrate-loaded binding protein associates with the ATP-bound transporter, thus
facilitating closure of the nucleotide binding domains and stabilizing the outward
facing conformation10,11. ATP hydrolysis and subsequent phosphate release drive a
conformational change to the inward-facing conformation, followed by substrate
release, and dissociation of the transporter/binding protein complex. This scheme of
events is perhaps best exemplified by the maltose transporter, as has been
comprehensively demonstrated by Davidson, Chen and colleagues4.In Escherichia coli and other gram-negative bacteria,
vitamin B12 transport across the outer membrane is mediated by the
collaborative action of a high affinity, β-barrel type outer membrane
transporter BtuB, and TonB, a periplasmic protein12,13. Once vitamin
B12 accumulates in the periplasm, its passage through the inner
membrane depends on the action of BtuCD, the E. coli vitamin
B12 ABC transporter, and BtuF, its high affinity cognate
substrate-binding protein14. Several
observations in the E. colivitamin B12ABC transport
system are suggestive that BtuCD-F operates by a distinctive mechanism relative to
that established for the maltose transporter and related ABC transporters. The
vitamin B12 binding protein, BtuF, has been demonstrated to form an
extremely stable complex with BtuCD15,16. Such an essentially irreversible
interaction is inconsistent with a mechanism in which the binding protein associates
and dissociates from the transporter during each transport cycle. In addition, upon
ATP binding, an EPR spin label attached to the cytoplasmic gate showed increased
mobility17. Although this observation
does not provide direct proof, it is compatible with opening of this gate to the
cytoplasm upon ATP binding.To better characterize the mechanism of vitamin B12 transport, we
have studied in detail the dynamic nature of association and dissociation between
BtuCD (the transporter) and BtuF (the binding protein) using
Surface Plasmon
Resonance (SPR, or BiaCore™). We have complemented
these studies with several other experimental approaches and in the present report
we delineate the kinetic and energetic relationships characterizing the interactions
between the transporter, binding protein and substrate. The results indicate that
BtuCD operates by a distinct mechanism than that proposed for the maltose
transporter and related ABC transporters. We propose that ABC importers can be
divided into groups that differ not only phylogenetically4,18 and
structurally5,19, but also mechanistically. We support this hypothesis with
preliminary characterization of two additional structurally characterized ABC import
systems: the D/L-methionine transporter MetIN-Q, and the metal-chelate transporter
Hi1470/1-2.
Results
Association between importers and their binding proteins
Models of binding protein dependent ABC transporters depict a short-lived
association between the transporter and its soluble binding protein, in which
the binding protein shuttles between the periplasm and the transporter to
deliver substrate molecules. However, the association between the vitamin
B12 transporter BtuCD and its binding protein, BtuF, does not fit
this model. As demonstrated by gel filtration experiments, when BtuF is prepared
in the absence of substrate and then mixed with BtuCD at a 1:1 molar ratio,
virtually all BtuF is in complex with the transporter, and none can be detected
in free form (Fig 1a). This complex can
then be isolated, and is extremely stable16. Similar results were obtained with the Haemophilus
influenzae putative metal-chelate ABC import system, Hi1470/1-2.
Prior to injection, a 1:1 molar ratio incubation of this transporter with its
binding protein results in a shift in the location and an increase in area of
the transporter peak, accompanied by an almost complete disappearance of the
binding protein peak (Fig 1b). In contrast
to these two observations, yet similar to what has been reported for the maltose
and histidine uptake systems, no complex formation was observed in the
methionine uptake system, even when the transporter (MetIN) was present at a
5-fold, 10-fold, or 20-fold molar excess of the binding protein (MetQ; Fig 1c and not shown).
Figure 1
Complex formation between ABC transporters and their binding proteins: (a)
BtuCD-F (b) Hi1470/1-2 (c) MetIN-Q. Size exclusion chromatography of ABC
transporters injected individually (blue traces) or after incubation with
their binding proteins (red traces). Also shown are equi-molar injections of
the binding proteins (black traces). Stable complex formation is
characterized by a shift in the location of, and slight increase in area of
the transporter peak, and by the disappearance of the binding protein peak.
In (a) and (b), injections were at a 1:1 molar ratio (transporter:binding
protein), in (c) 3:1 molar ratio.
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR or BiaCore™) was used to further
characterize the interactions between ABC transporters and their binding
proteins. BtuCD, Hi1470/1, and MetIN were immobilized via His-tags on a BiaCore
chip. Following immobilization, non His-tagged binding proteins (BtuF, Hi1472,
or MetQ, respectively) were injected onto the flow cells. Figure 2a-c demonstrates the specificity of the BiaCore
system, as the transporters interacted only with their cognate binding proteins,
and not with binding proteins from different systems. When 20 nM BtuF is flowed
over a flow cell onto which BtuCD is immobilized, a robust response,
representing complex formation is measured (Fig.
2a). Once the injection is terminated (and washing of the chip with
buffer begins), the complex is stable and does not dissociate. Similarly, upon
injection of 20 nM Hi1472 over immobilized Hi1470/1, the two rapidly associate,
and complete dissociation is observed only after 30-40 min (Fig. 2b). A much higher concentration (15 μM) was
necessary to elicit a proportional response when injecting MetQ over immobilized
MetIN. In this system, complex formation is also observed (Fig. 2c); however, in contrast to the previous two transport
systems, upon termination of MetQ injection (and commencement of chip washing
with buffer), the MetIN-Q complex quickly dissociates. The different kinetic
behavior of the three import systems is further illustrated in Fig. 2d-f, where a series of concentrations
of the binding proteins is injected over a constant concentration of the
transporters.
Figure 2
Dynamics of complex formation in BtuCD-F (a, d), Hi1470/1-2 (b, e), and
MetIN-Q (c, f) import systems. The transporters (~30 ng) were
immobilized onto a BiaCore™ chip and subjected to the following: (a,
b, c) Injections of the BtuF, Hi1472, or MetQ as indicated by the arrows.
(d, e, f) Injections of the indicated concentrations of BtuF, Hi1472, or
MetQ, respectively. Black traces in d, e, and f are the fits to the
experimental data curves. Standard errors for these fits are given in Table I. (g) Association of BtuF and
BtuCD in proteoliposomes. 20 nM FLAG-tagged BtuF was added to empty
liposomes or proteoliposomes reconstituted with either MetIN or BtuCD, as
indicated. The liposome-bound and unbound fractions of BtuF were separated
and visualized by immuno-blot detection.
The association/dissociation curves of all three systems displayed clear
biphasic characteristics, and were better described by applying fitting models
that take into account a possible conformational change upon association (see
the methods section). The initial
association event (ka1 values in Table I) of the three import systems is characterized by moderate to
fast rates (~103 to 105
M-1s-1), with Hi1470/1/2 being the fastest, and
MetIN-Q the slowest. As can be appreciated by a visual comparison of Fig. 2 c-f, greater variance is observed in
the dissociation rates. While the kd1 for BtuCD-F is almost
negligible at ~10-8 s-1 (i.e. ~2 ×
10-3 day-1), the corresponding value for MetIN-Q,
~0.2 s-1 (Table I), is
compatible with measured transport rates of ABC transporters20-22. Derivation of the equilibrium dissociation constants
(Kd) from the rate constants given in Table I yield high (10-13 M),
medium (~10-9 M), and low (10-4 M) affinities for
BtuCD-F, Hi1470/1/2 and MetIN-Q, respectively. The ~100 micromolar
Kd (7.4 × 10-5 M) of the
MetIN-Q interaction is in agreement with its anticipated low affinity, as
suggested by the gel filtration results (Fig.
1c). Similarly low affinities were measured in the maltose, histidine
and oligopeptide systems9,23,24. While the ka1 for the three studied systems differ by
two orders of magnitude, the kd1 and equilibrium constants vary by up
to 8 orders of magnitude (Table 1),
indicating that the dominant contributions to changes in binding affinities
reflect variations in the dissociation rate constants.
Table 1
Kinetic rate constants determined in BiaCore™ experiments for the
BtuCD-F, Hi1470/1-2, and MetIN-Q import systems.
Transport system
Additives
ka1
M-1s-1
kd1
s-1
ka2
s-1
kd2
s-1
Kd (M)
Vitamin
B12
None
(4.54±
0.05)•104
(1.12±
0.28)•10-8
(1.12±
0.06)•10-3
(9.95±
0.18)•10-4
1.16•10-13
Vitamin B12
(3.85±
0.15)•105
1.51 ± 0.05
(2.37±
0.02)•10-3
(1.28±
0.37)•10-5
2.11•10-8
ATP/EDTA
(9.58±
0.07)•103
(1.36±
0.09)•10-6
(1.67±
0.39)•10-3
(9.79±
0.38)•10-4
6.23•10-11
ATP/EDTA + Vitamin B12
No association detected
ATP/Mg/vanadate
(5.51±
0.22)•104
(2.03±
0.19)•10-6
(1.01±
0.09)•10-3
(9.97±
0.84)•10-5
1.76•10-11
ATP/Mg/vanadate + Vitamin
B12
No association detected
ADP/Mg
(4.82±
0.06)•105
(3.01±
0.01)•10-4
(2.06±
0.05)•10-2
(5.2±
0.21)•10-4
4.95•10-13
ADP/Mg + Vitamin B12
(2.10±
0.04)•104
0.99 ± 0.01
(2.02 ±
0.03)•10-2
(1.59±
0.52)•10-5
3.34•10-8
ATP/Mg + Vitamin B12
(3.73±
0.00)•104
0.77 ± 0.01
(5.14 ±
0.01)•10-2
(9.02±
7.3)•10-6
3.6•10-9
Putative Metal-Chelate
None
(8.83±0.07)•105
(1.01±
0.06)•10-2
(4.55±
0.41)•10-2
(4.01±
0.08)•10-2
5.72•10-9
D/L-methionine
None
(3.08±
0.20)•103
0.23 ±0.04
(9.55±
0.40)•10-7
(9.00 ±
3.00)•10-2
7.40•10-5
k, k: Forward and
reverse rate constants of the initial association leading to complex
formation.
k, k: Forward and
reverse rate constants of the conformational change following complex
formation.
K: Dissociation constant calculated from derived
rate constants (see Methods)
To study whether a high-affinity BtuCD-F complex also forms in the
membrane milieu, BtuCD was reconstituted into liposomes. The interaction of
BtuCD-liposomes with BtuF was then compared to the interactions of BtuF with
either empty liposomes or liposomes reconstituted with MetIN. BtuF (20 nM) was
added to liposomes or proteoliposomes containing equal amounts of either BtuCD
or MetIN. Following a 10-minute incubation, the liposomes were pelleted by
ultracentrifugation. As shown (Fig 2g),
most, if not all of the added BtuF was bound to the BtuCD-liposomes, while none
was found to associate with either the MetIN-liposomes or the empty liposomes.
In contrast, no unbound BtuF was detected in the soluble fraction of the
BtuCD-liposomes, and all of BtuF was found in the soluble fractions of the
MetIN-liposomes and the empty liposomes. The seemingly complete binding of BtuF
by BtuCD-liposomes is indicative that the Kd of the
interaction is lower than 20 nM. Lower BtuF concentrations could not be tested
since 20 nM is the detection limit of this SDS-PAGE-based assay (see methods).
Vitamin B12 binding and release
The stability of the transporter-binding protein complex, characteristic
of the vitamin B12 and Hi1470/1-2 uptake systems, prompted
speculations that perhaps it is this complex that is responsible for substrate
binding20. Vitamin B12
forms a pinkish aqueous solution with an absorbance maximum at 360 nm, which
enables detection of its association with proteins. BtuCD, BtuF and the complex
BtuCD-F were purified to homogeneity and analyzed by size exclusion
chromatography before (Fig. 3a) or after
(Fig. 3b) incubation with vitamin
B12. When BtuCD is incubated with 50 μM vitamin
B12, no 360 nm absorbance is observed in the fractions
corresponding to the 280 nm elution peak of the transporter. Additions of
ATP/Mg, ADP/Mg, AMP-PNP/Mg, AMP-PCP/Mg or ATP/EDTA (see methods for details) yielded identical 360 nm elution
profiles, suggesting that regardless of its nucleotide state, BtuCD does not
bind vitamin B12 with high affinity at the tested concentration range
(10-100 μM). Much like the free transporter, the BtuCD-F complex does not
bind vitamin B12 (Fig. 3b),
irrespective of the nucleotide state of the transport complex. In contrast to
BtuCD or the complex BtuCD-F, when the periplasmic binding protein BtuF is
prepared in the absence of vitamin B12, and then incubated with this
substrate, the two associate tightly as indicated by the 360 nm peak eluting at
~17 ml, and by the decrease in the amount of free vitamin B12
eluting at ~20.5 ml. These results are in agreement with the reported
high affinity (~15 nM) of BtuF to B1214. Taken together, these results suggest that only free,
un-complexed BtuF binds substrate with high affinity, while the free
transporter, or the transport complex, lack this capacity regardless of their
nucleotide state.
Figure 3
Substrate binding by components of the vitamin B12 transport
system. BtuCD (blue), BtuF (solid black), and the BtuCD-F complex (red) were
purified and subjected to size exclusion chromatography before (a) or after
(b) incubation with 50 μM vitamin B12 (dashed black).
Absorbance was recorded at 280 nm (a) or 360 nm (b).
A similar approach was employed to investigate substrate release in the
BtuCD-F transport system. In these experiments, the binding protein (BtuF) was
prepared in the presence of a saturating concentration (10 μM) of vitamin
B12. Figure 4a shows the 360
nm elution profile when such a preparation is submitted to gel filtration
chromatography. Two clear peaks can be distinguished: one eluting at ~17
ml and the other eluting at ~20.5 ml. These two peaks correspond to
BtuF-bound vitamin B12 and free vitamin B12, respectively.
When the same preparation is subjected to a 10-fold or a 100-fold wash with
buffer devoid of vitamin B12 (see methods for details), the latter peak diminishes and all but
disappears, while the peak corresponding to the BtuF-bound vitamin
B12 remains almost constant (Fig.
4a). This observation suggests that under these conditions, vitamin
B12 is not efficiently released from BtuF. When an identical
preparation of vitamin B12-loaded BtuF (washed 100-fold from any free
vitamin B12) is mixed with BtuCD at a molar ratio of 1:2
(BtuCD:BtuF), roughly half of the 360 nm signal previously associated with BtuF
appears as free vitamin B12 (Fig.
4b, red trace). When vitamin B12-loaded BtuF is mixed with
BtuCD at a 1:1 molar ratio, almost all of the vitamin B12 appears in
free form. Addition of BtuCD in excess of BtuF (2:1 molar ratio) results in
complete release of vitamin B12 from BtuF (Fig. 4b, compare 20.5 ml peak of green trace and ~17
ml peak of cyan trace, respectively). The small 360 nm peak that gradually
appears at ~13.5 ml reflects the small absorbance that BtuCD and the
BtuCD-F complex have in this wavelength. Vitamin B12 was never
observed to associate with either BtuCD or the complex BtuCD-F, suggesting that
upon binding of BtuF to BtuCD, vitamin B12 is released from BtuF, and
is only transiently associated with the complex.
Figure 4
Substrate release from the vitamin B12 transport system. (a) BtuF
was prepared in the presence of 10 μM vitamin B12 and
subjected to separation by size exclusion chromatography (blue). The same
preparation was washed 10-fold (red) or 100-fold (dashed black) with buffer
devoid of vitamin B12. Absorbance was recorded at 360 nm. (b) An
identical preparation of BtuF (washed 100-fold) was subjected to separation
by size exclusion chromatography before (red) or after incubation with BtuCD
at 1:2 (blue), 1:1 (black), or 2:1 (dashed cyan) BtuCD:BtuF: molar ratio.
Also shown (in grey) is an injection of BtuCD at the highest concentration
used. Absorbance was recorded at 360 nm.
Substrate effects on the association between BtuCD and BtuF
The effect of substrate on complex formation was investigated through
BiaCore experiments where BtuF was injected in the presence of increasing
concentrations of vitamin B12 (Fig.
5a). Remarkably, the stability of the BtuCDF complex was observed to
decrease in the presence of vitamin B12. So pronounced was this
effect, that in the presence of vitamin B12 concentrations >50
μM, the equilibrium affinity decreases by ~5 orders of magnitude
(Table I). In Fig. 5a, the greatest effect of increasing the vitamin
B12 concentrations was between 0.48 μM and 2.4 μM.
This is most probably due to the degree of occupancy of BtuF (1 μM used
in this experiment) by vitamin B12, rather than the binding affinity
of BtuF towards vitamin B12
Figure 5
Substrate effects on complex formation in the vitamin B12
transport system. (a) BiaCore™ experiments: His-tagged BtuCD
(~30 ng) was immobilized onto a Ni-NTA chip. At 0 seconds, 1
μM BtuF was injected in the presence of 0-300 μM vitamin
B12, as indicated. (b) Size exclusion chromatography: The
following preparations were analyzed by gel filtration chromatography: BtuF
prepared in the absence of vitamin B12 and mixed with BtuCD
(blue), BtuF prepared in the presence of 100 μM vitamin
B12 and then mixed with BtuCD (red). An identical amount of
BtuF injected by itself (black). All traces were recorded at 280 nm. (c)
Pull-down experiments: His-tagged BtuCD was immobilized onto Ni-NTA resin
and incubated with 2 μM FLAG-BtuF in the absence or presence of the
indicated vitamin B12 concentrations. Unbound protein was
removed, and the amount of retained FLAG-BtuF was visualized by
immuno-detection using an anti-FLAG antibody. (d) Complex formation in
proteoliposomes. 35 nM FLAG-tagged BtuF was added to BtuCD-proteoliposomes,
in the absence or presence of the indicated vitamin B12
concentrations. Bound and unbound BtuF were separated as detailed in the
methods section. The amount of
FLAG-BtuF was visualized by immuno-detection using an anti-FLAG
antibody.
Two additional, independent experimental methods were employed to
validate this observation. In the first set of experiments, size exclusion
chromatography was used to qualitatively evaluate the effect of substrate on
complex formation. Fig. 5b shows that when
BtuF is prepared in the absence of substrate and then incubated with a two-fold
molar excess of BtuCD, no peak representing free BtuF is observed, and
practically all of the binding protein is associated with the transporter. When
100 μM vitamin B12 is added to BtuF prior to its incubation
with BtuCD, all the BtuF appears as a free, un-complexed form (compare
~17 ml peak of red and green traces in Fig.
5b). Similar results were obtained by pull-down experiments, where
either His-tagged BtuCD or His-tagged BtuF were immobilized on Ni-NTA beads and
incubated with a FLAG-tagged partner (see methods for details). Fig. 5c
shows that also in these experiments, the amount of retained FLAG-tagged protein
was inversely related to the concentration of vitamin B12. As
observed in the BiaCore system (Fig. 5a),
the greatest effect of the increasing vitamin B12 concentrations was
between 233 nM and 2.85 μM, reflecting the BtuF concentration (~2
μM) used in this experiment.Substrate effects were also studied in a liposome-reconstituted system.
In these experiments, 35 nM BtuF were added to BtuCD-liposomes in the presence
or absence of various concentrations of vitamin B12. Similar to what
has been observed in the solution experiments (Biacore, gel-filtration,
pull-downs), the affinity between BtuCD and BtuF decreased with increasing
substrate concentrations (Fig. 5d).To further characterize the observed substrate effects, rate constants
of complex association and dissociation were determined in the presence of
saturating vitamin B12 concentrations. Relative to the values
determined in the absence of substrate, addition of substrate resulted in a
modest (10-20-fold) stimulation of ka1 (Fig. 6a, Table 1). However,
most remarkable is the substrate-induced stimulation of complex dissociation: in
the presence of vitamin B12, the kd1 of the initial
interaction is accelerated by ~8 orders of magnitude, from 1.12 ×
10-8 s-1 to 1.55 s-1 (Fig. 2d, Fig. 6a, Table 1). The equilibrium dissociation
constant (Kd = 2.11 × 10-8 M)
calculated between the binding protein and transporter in the presence of
vitamin B12 is consistent with the substrate-induced decrease in
equilibrium affinity described above (Fig.
5).
Figure 6
Effects of nucleotide binding and hydrolysis on complex formation in the
vitamin B12 transport system. The indicated BtuF concentrations
were injected in the presence of 200 μM vitamin B12 and:
(a) No further addition (b) 1 mM ATP, 50 μM EDTA (c) 1 mM ATP, 2 mM
MgSO4, 1 mM ortho-vanadate (d) 1 mM ADP, 2 mM
MgSO4 (e) 1 mM ATP, 2 mM MgSO4. Black traces are
the fits to the experimental data curves. Standard errors for these fits are
given in Table I. Inset in (b) shows
pull-down experiment of Ni-NTA-immobilized His-tagged BtuCD incubated with
FLAG-tagged BtuF in the presence of 25 μM vitamin B12, in
the absence of nucleotide, or in the presence of 1 mM ATP, 50 μM EDTA
or 1 mM AMP-PNP, 2 mM MgSO4 as indicated. The amount of retained
FLAG-BtuF was visualized by immuno-detection using an anti-FLAG antibody.
(f) Interaction in the membrane: BtuCD-liposomes were prepared in the
absence (top panel) or presence (bottom panel) of 1 mM ATP, 50 μM
EDTA. 35 nM FLAG-tagged BtuF was added to the liposomes in the presence of
the indicated vitamin B12 concentrations. Bound and unbound BtuF
were separated as detailed in the methods section. The amount of FLAG-BtuF was visualized by
immuno-detection using an anti-FLAG antibody.
Effects of nucleotide on BtuCD-F association/dissociation
The effects of nucleotide binding and hydrolysis on the interactions
between BtuCD and BtuF were measured at several conditions that presumably mimic
the sequential steps of ATP hydrolysis. Binding of nucleotides by BtuCD and
BtuCD-F was verified by measuring the 260/280 nm absorbance ratios in the
absence or presence of ATP, and by conducting ATP hydrolysis assays (see supplementary methods and
supplementary Fig. 1). Notably, in the presence of vitamin
B12, upon binding of ATP (or ATP analogues), no association
between BtuF and BtuCD could be detected (Compare Fig. 6a and 6b). The reduced affinity between the nucleotide bound
transporter and the substrate-loaded binding protein was also observed in
pull-down experiments. Using this approach, complex formation was readily
observed in the nucleotide-free state, yet was undetectable in the
nucleotide-bound state (Fig. 6b inset).
Importantly, the lack of interaction between BtuCD and BtuF was not due to any
destabilizing effects of nucleotide binding on BtuCD (supplementary Fig.
2).The combined effect of substrate and nucleotide binding was also studied
in the liposome-reconstituted system. In these experiments, BtuCD-reconstituted
liposomes were prepared in the presence or absence of 1 mM ATP, 50 μM
EDTA. As shown (Fig. 6f), ATP binding by
membrane-embedded BtuCD decreased its affinity to BtuF both in the absence or
presence of substrate. Such was this effect, that in the presence ATP, EDTA, and
saturating concentrations of vitamin B12, no complex formation could
be detected.Concomitant additions of ATP, magnesium, and vanadate have previously
been used to trap ABC transporters25,26 and BtuCD (20 and supplementary Fig. 1) in
a transition state of ATP hydrolysis. Similar to what has been observed in the
nucleotide-bound state, in the presence of vitamin B12, no complex
formation could be detected in this transition state (Fig. 6c). Interestingly, in the maltoseABC import system,
this state induces the highest affinity between the maltose transporter and the
maltose binding protein21,27. It seems that the opposite is true for
the vitamin B12ABC transport system.The post-hydrolysis, ADP-bound state is shown in Fig. 6d. In this state, complex formation and dissociation
are once again readily detected with kinetic constants that are similar to the
nucleotide-free state (Table 1).Generation of hydrolytic conditions by addition of Mg-ATP likely results
in a mixed population of BtuCD molecules as they progress through the various
conformations accompanying ATP binding and hydrolysis. This ensemble of
conformations is comprised of four of the above-mentioned states (Fig 6a to 6d). Thus, the kinetic parameters
measured under hydrolyzing conditions are a weighted average, dictated by the
proportion of the molecules residing at each state, and the average dwell time
in each state. Fig 6e shows a sensogram
recording in the presence of vitamin B12 and Mg-ATP, with rate
constants that are most similar to those determined in the absence of nucleotide
or in the presence of Mg-ADP (Table 1).
Considering the high levels of cellular ATP, this suggests that on average,
ATP-hydrolyzing BtuCD molecules reside longer in the ADP-bound state than in the
pre-hydrolysis (ATP bound) or in the transition (Mg-ATP/vanadate) states, where
no association was observed.
Discussion
In the present report, we have studied in detail the effects of substrate
and nucleotide binding on the formation of the BtuCD-Fvitamin B12
transport complex. As discussed below, a synopsis of the current data suggest a
distinct mechanism of transport in this system relative to the model developed for
the more extensively characterized maltoseABC transporter.In the absence of vitamin B12, BtuF at concentrations above
10-11 M, will be bound by BtuCD. Our previous20 and current (supplementary figure 1) results indicate that the BtuCD-F
complex binds and hydrolyzes ATP at least as efficiently as free BtuCD, both in
proteoliposomes and in solution. We expect this substrate-free complex to shift
through the energetic minima depicted in the bottom left corners of panels I-IV of
the thermodynamic scheme shown in Fig. 7a. The
high intrinsic stability of the complex presents a considerable energetic hurdle for
productive transport: the crystal structure16
of BtuCD-F indicates that once the complex has formed, vitamin B12 cannot
access the binding site. This notion is supported here by the observation that the
complex is unable to bind substrate (Fig. 3).
Hence, the complex must dissociate for transport to occur (Fig. 7b state I). As shown (Figs
5 and 6), complex dissociation is
facilitated by both substrate and ATP. However, other factors may also affect the
association of BtuCD and BtuF. For example, through its interaction with BtuF,
TonB28 may influence the formation of the
BtuCD-F complex. In addition, tight transcriptional and/or translational control (as
have been observed in the vitamin B12 uptake system and related
systems29-31) may prevent expression of BtuCD-F in the absence of substrate.
Clearly, further studies are required to resolve these complexities.
Figure 7
(a) Thermodynamic scheme summarizing the equilibrium constants determined for
the vitamin B12 transport system. Each panel represents a
different nucleotide state of BtuCD: the horizontal reactions describe
vitamin B12 binding/release while the vertical reactions are for
formation/dissociation of the BtuCD-F complex. In each panel, the vertical
left and right reactions are for BtuCD-F complex formation in the absence
and presence of vitamin B12, respectively. Unless otherwise
indicated, all values were experimentally determined. (b) Mechanistic
differences between the maltose transporter and BtuCD-F. The ground state of
the vitamin B12 system is the stable BtuCD-F complex, which has
high levels of basal ATPase activity. In the maltose system, the
corresponding state is that of the free transporter, with low levels of
ATPase activity. In both systems the transition to the transport states is
driven by substrate. Vitamin B12 drives complex dissociation,
while maltose, by stabilizing the closed conformation of MalE, contributes
to complex stability. The MalFGK-E complex is stabilized by ATP binding (or
transition state, panel II), while the BtuCD-F complex is destabilized by
ATP binding (panel III).
As vitamin B12 is transported into the periplasm by BtuB and
TonB, it can only be efficiently bound by BtuF, which is the only component of the
system with high substrate affinity14 (Fig 3). Neither BtuCD nor BtuCD-F have high
affinity for substrate, regardless of their nucleotide state; accordingly,
thermodynamic considerations (Fig 7a,
horizontal bottom constants of panels I and IV) provide an estimate of
10-3 M for the affinity between BtuCD-F and vitamin
B12.Upon association of vitamin B12-loaded BtuF and BtuCD, substrate
is released from BtuF and is not retained by the complex (Fig 4, Fig. 7b state II).
These findings are in agreement with the absence of vitamin B12 from the
published crystal structure of the BtuCD-F complex (despite that this complex was
prepared by incubating vitamin B12-loaded BtuF with BtuCD16). Clearly, our present work could not
determine the directionality of substrate release as these experiments were
conducted in solution (Fig. 4). It is possible
that in our solution experiments, vitamin B12 is released at the
cis side via an “escape pathway”, rather than
being properly released at the trans side (productive transport).
If indeed such escape pathway occurs, this may explain the poor transport
stoichiometry (~100 ATP/ vitamin B12) measured in reconstituted
proteoliposomes20.The key findings of the present report are at variance from the mechanistic
model that has been established in detail for the maltose transporter (Fig. 7b), and to varying degrees for other ABC
transporters11,32. In the histidine and maltose import systems, substrate-free
or substrate-loaded binding proteins interact with similar equilibrium affinity
(micromolar range) with the transporter24,27. In the oligopeptide import
system (OppABCDF), substrate greatly increases the affinity between the membrane
embedded transporter and its receptor9. As
reported here, a very different substrate effect is observed in the BtuCD-F system:
vitamin B12 accelerates complex formation 10-20-fold, and complex
dissociation ~107-fold, resulting in a ~105 drop
in equilibrium affinity (Figs 5, 6 and 7,
table I). The effects of vitamin
B12 on the kinetics of interaction between BtuCD and BtuF underline
the importance of conducting pre-equilibrium measurements of ABC transport
systems.Another mechanistic aspect that seems to differ between ABC transporters is
the effect of binding protein on the rate of ATP hydrolysis. In the maltose and the
histidine systems, marked increase of ATPase rates is induced only by association of
substrate-loaded binding protein with the transporter. In contrast, very modest
stimulation (less than 2-fold20, supplementary Fig. 1) of ATP
hydrolysis rate is observed upon formation of the BtuCD-F complex, and this
low-level stimulation is conveyed by substrate-free and substrate-loaded binding
protein alike. With the exception of the TAP system 33,34, low levels of
substrate-induced stimulation of ATPase rates also seem to be a feature of ABC
exporters, especially multi-drug transporters35-37. The differences in
substrate-induced effects on the interaction between the binding protein and the
transporter (and its outcome) is perhaps related to the extent of substrate-induced
conformational changes of the binding proteins: the maltose and histidine binding
proteins (of type I ABC importers) undergo appreciable structural rearrangements
upon substrate binding38. In comparison,
ShuT39, PhuT40, FhuD41 and BtuF15,42
(binding proteins of type II ABC importers) exhibit modest to negligible
conformational changes upon substrate binding.BtuCD has the lowest affinity for BtuF in the ATP-bound or transition state
analog-bound forms (Fig. 7a panels II &
III, Fig. 7b state III, Fig 6, table I). In its
nucleotide-free state, BtuCD has the highest affinity towards BtuF. Again, this is
in direct opposition to the maltose system, where it was clearly demonstrated that
the nucleotide bound transporter, and the transition state for ATP hydrolysis, have
the highest affinity toward the maltose binding protein, while the nucleotide-free
form has the lowest (Fig. 7b, state II of
bottom panel)21. Similarly, following release
of vitamin B12, the now substrate-free BtuCD-F complex represents the
most stable, lowest energy state of the transport cycle (Fig. 7a panel I, bottom left corner). In comparison, the
MalFGK-E complex is the highest energy intermediate of the reaction, and under
normal turnover conditions it is undetectable. In this respect, the putative
metal-chelate import system (Hi1470/1/2) resembles BtuCD-F, as it forms a
quasi-stable complex in the absence of nucleotide (Fig
1b, Fig 2b&e), while the
D/L-methionine import system (MetIN-Q) forms a low affinity complex (Fig 2c&f) much like MalFGK-E or HisPQM-J.Sequence based phylogenetic segregation of ABC transporters divides them to
distinct evolutionary branches18. According
to this classification, BtuCD-F and Hi1470/1/2 are similar to each other, yet are
relatively distant from the maltose, molybdate, histidine, and methionine import
systems. In addition to sequence conservation, recent comparisons of the crystal
structures of ABC transporters suggest that the phylogenetic groups may also share a
common fold of their membrane-spanning domain5,19. Thus, the maltose,
molybdate, and methionine import systems share a core fold that is distinct from the
fold shared by BtuCD-F and Hi1470/1-2. In the present report, we add another
dimension to this picture, and suggest that members of different subclasses of ABC
transporters differ not only in sequence and structure, but also in mechanism.
Further investigations of the genetic, structural, and functional heterogeneity of
ABC transporters will clearly advance our understanding of these elaborate cellular
machines.
Authors: Nathalie Cadieux; Clive Bradbeer; Eva Reeger-Schneider; Wolfgang Köster; Arun K Mohanty; Michael C Wiener; Robert J Kadner Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: Simon Böhm; Anke Licht; Steven Wuttge; Erwin Schneider; Enrica Bordignon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-03-18 Impact factor: 11.205