Literature DB >> 20173679

Change in Modic type 1 and 2 signals after posterolateral fusion surgery.

Seiji Ohtori1, Masaomi Yamashita, Kazuyo Yamauchi, Gen Inoue, Takana Koshi, Munetaka Suzuki, Sumihisa Orita, Yawara Eguchi, Nobuyasu Ochiai, Shunji Kishida, Masashi Takaso, Kazuki Kuniyoshi, Tetsuhiro Ishikawa, Gen Arai, Masayuki Miyagi, Hiroto Kamoda, Junichi Nakamura, Yasuchika Aoki, Kazuhisa Takahashi.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the change of Modic Type 1 to Type 2 after posterolateral fusion surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar vertebral bone marrow change is divided into Modic types. Magnetic resonance imaging reveals Modic Type 1 and 2 signals. Some reports indicate that with time, Type 1 signals (intervertebral instability) change to Type 2 (restabilization), but the reliability of this assertion is unclear. The current study examines the change of Modic Type 1 signals to Type 2 after posterolateral fusion surgery.
METHODS: Patients with Modic Type 1 and 2 signals were selected (mean age, 65 years). All patients suffered low back pain and leg pain due to lumbar spinal canal stenosis, and underwent decompression and posterolateral fusion surgery. We evaluated change in Modic signal and severity of low back pain (Visual analogue scale score, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and Oswestry Disability Index before and 24 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Of 21 patients with Modic Type 1 signals before surgery, 2 cases changed to normal bone marrow, 9 to Type 2, and 12 remained Type 1. Of 12 patients with Type 2 signals, none changed to Type 1, 2 changed to normal bone marrow, and 10 remained Type 2. Visual analogue scale score, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and Oswestry Disability Index improved after surgery; however, low back pain was not significantly associated with signal change after surgery (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In the current study, Modic Type 1 signals changed to Type 2; however, Type 2 did not change to Type 1, suggesting that Type 2 signals indicate a stabilized stage. For Modic Type 1 and 2 signals, there were changes to normal bone marrow signals in 4 cases. Therefore, degenerated bone marrow may be able to regenerate after surgical stabilization. We did not show a significant difference between low back pain and signal type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20173679     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bde562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

Review 1.  Do Modic changes have an impact on clinical outcome in lumbar spine surgery? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Aske Foldbjerg Laustsen; Rachid Bech-Azeddine
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The relationship between traction spurs, Modic change, vacuum phenomenon, and segmental instability of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Masatsugu Tsukamoto; Tadatsugu Morimoto; Takaomi Kobayashi; Kazuki Muranaka; Tomohito Yoshihara; Kazumasa Maeda; Motoki Sonohata; Yuichi Kasai; Koji Otani; Masaaki Mawatari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  The effects of lumbar fusion and non-fusion surgery on the development of Modic changes.

Authors:  Xiaoping Mu; Seong Woong Kim; Eberhard Uhl; Karsten Schöller
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.677

Review 4.  The clinical course of pain and disability following surgery for spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Carolina G Fritsch; Manuela L Ferreira; Christopher G Maher; Robert D Herbert; Rafael Z Pinto; Bart Koes; Paulo H Ferreira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Vertebral bone mineral measures and psychological wellbeing among individuals with modic changes.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Peter B O'Sullivan; Deryck Foulner; John D Wark
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Case Rep       Date:  2012-03-27

6.  Change of Lumbar Ligamentum Flavum after Indirect Decompression Using Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Seiji Ohtori; Sumihisa Orita; Kazuyo Yamauchi; Yawara Eguchi; Yasuchika Aoki; Junichi Nakamura; Masayuki Miyagi; Miyako Suzuki; Gou Kubota; Kazuhide Inage; Takeshi Sainoh; Jun Sato; Kazuki Fujimoto; Yasuhiro Shiga; Koki Abe; Hiroto Kanamoto; Gen Inoue; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Takeo Furuya; Masao Koda
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-02-17

Review 7.  Evaluating the Impact of Modic Changes on Operative Treatment in the Cervical and Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mark J Lambrechts; Parker Brush; Tariq Z Issa; Gregory R Toci; Jeremy C Heard; Amit Syal; Meghan M Schilken; Jose A Canseco; Christopher K Kepler; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  The Association of MRI Findings and Long-Term Disability in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Peter Muhareb Udby; Søren Ohrt-Nissen; Tom Bendix; Stig Brorson; Leah Y Carreon; Mikkel Østerheden Andersen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.