Literature DB >> 20173365

Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Sheng-Zheng Wang1, Ling-Wu Chen, Yong-Hai Zhang, Wen-Wei Wang, Wei Chen, Huan-Yi Lin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present our experience of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (HALRC) and compare it with open radical cystectomy (ORC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: During the period between May 2004 and November 2007, 31 patients underwent HALRC and 39 patients underwent ORC for bladder cancer. The patient demographics, intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes were compared retrospectively.
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference with regard to age, sex, body mass index, and urinary diversion in the 2 groups. In the HALRC group, 20 patients had stage pT2 or less, 7 had pT3 disease, and 4 had stage pT4 disease. In the ORC group, 29 patients had stage pT2 or less, 5 had pT3 disease, and 5 had stage pT4 disease. All margins in both groups were negative. The HALRC group had decreased blood loss (250.9 vs. 812.8 ml, p < 0.001) and a lower rate of transfusion (9.7 vs. 76.9%, p < 0.001), but similar mean operative time (365.7 vs. 362.6 min, p = 0.862). Time to liquid diet was significantly less in the HALRC group versus the ORC group (4.3 vs. 6.3 days, p < 0.001). The median number of lymph nodes were similar between the HALRC and ORC groups (14 vs. 15, p = 0.377). Six patients developed perioperative complications in the HALRC group and 12 patients had complications in the ORC group (19.4 vs. 30.8%, p = 0.278). Late complications occurred in 3 patients (2 parastomal hernias and 1 ureteroenteral stricture) in the HALRC group.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ORC, HALRC patients had decreased blood loss, less transfusion requirements, and quicker intestinal recovery. Long-term follow-up in a larger cohort of patients is needed to assess the long-term oncological and functional outcomes. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20173365     DOI: 10.1159/000273462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  5 in total

1.  [Propensity-matched comparison of laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy for female patients with bladder cancer].

Authors:  H W Huang; B Yan; M X Shang; L B Liu; H Hao; Z J Xi
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-08-18

2.  Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy in 607 patients with bladder cancer: Comparative survival analysis.

Authors:  Haiwen Huang; Bing Yan; Han Hao; Meixia Shang; Qun He; Libo Liu; Zhijun Xi
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Bladder cancer--the neglected tumor: a descriptive analysis of publications referenced in MEDLINE and data from the register ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Frank Kunath; Steffen F Krause; Bernd Wullich; Peter J Goebell; Dirk G Engehausen; Maximilian Burger; Joerg J Meerpohl; Bastian Keck
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 4.  Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Kun Tang; Heng Li; Ding Xia; Zhiquan Hu; Qianyuan Zhuang; Jihong Liu; Hua Xu; Zhangqun Ye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Bayesian network analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Lin Dong; Yu Qin; Lu Ya; Cao Liang; Hu Tinghui; He Pinlin; Yang Jin; Wang Youliang; Cui Shu; Wu Tao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.