Literature DB >> 20173299

Perils of evidence-based medicine.

Ben A Williams1.   

Abstract

Evidenced-based medicine views random-assignment clinical trials as the gold standard of evidence. Because patient populations are heterogeneous, large numbers of patients must be studied in order to achieve statistically significant results, but the means or medians of these large samples have weak predictive validity for individual patients. Further, the logic of random-assignment clinical trials allows only the inference that some subset of patients benefits from the treatment. Post-hoc analysis is therefore necessary to identify those patients. Otherwise, many patients may receive treatments that are useless and potentially harmful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20173299     DOI: 10.1353/pbm.0.0132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Biol Med        ISSN: 0031-5982            Impact factor:   1.416


  10 in total

1.  What's in a gold standard? In defence of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Marius Backmann
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-12

2.  Optimizing behavioral health interventions with single-case designs: from development to dissemination.

Authors:  Jesse Dallery; Bethany R Raiff
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Future thinking to decrease real-world drinking in alcohol use disorder: Repairing reinforcer pathology in a randomized proof-of-concept trial.

Authors:  Liqa N Athamneh; Jeremiah Brown; Jeffrey S Stein; Kirstin M Gatchalian; Stephen M LaConte; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.492

4.  Developing and evaluating interventions that are applicable and relevant to inpatients and those who care for them; a multiphase, pragmatic action research approach.

Authors:  Jack J Bell; Tony Rossi; Judith D Bauer; Sandra Capra
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  A quasi-randomized feasibility pilot study of specific treatments to improve emotion recognition and mental-state reasoning impairments in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Pamela Jane Marsh; Vince Polito; Subba Singh; Max Coltheart; Robyn Langdon; Anthony W Harris
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Evaluating and Using Observational Evidence: The Contrasting Views of Policy Makers and Epidemiologists.

Authors:  Lily O'Donoughue Jenkins; Paul M Kelly; Nicolas Cherbuin; Kaarin J Anstey
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2016-12-06

7.  Timing of evidence-based non-surgical interventions as part of multimodal treatment guidelines for the management of cervical radiculopathy: a Delphi study protocol.

Authors:  Erik Thoomes; Marloes Thoomes-de Graaf; Joshua Cleland; Alessio Gallina; Deborah Falla
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Single-case experimental designs to evaluate novel technology-based health interventions.

Authors:  Jesse Dallery; Rachel N Cassidy; Bethany R Raiff
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Are pharmacological randomised controlled clinical trials relevant to real-life asthma populations? A protocol for an UNLOCK study from the IPCRG.

Authors:  Karin Lisspers; Pedro Teixeira; Coert Blom; Janwillem Kocks; Björn Ställberg; David Price; Niels Chavannes
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.871

10.  Remote Alcohol Monitoring to Facilitate Incentive-Based Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Warren K Bickel; Anita S Kablinger
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.455

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.