Literature DB >> 20173088

Bioequivalence studies of omnitrope, the first biosimilar/rhGH follow-on protein: two comparative phase 1 randomized studies and population pharmacokinetic analysis.

Richard Stanhope1, Fritz Sörgel, Patricia Gravel, Yannic B Pannatier Schuetz, Markus Zabransky, Michael Muenzberg.   

Abstract

This article discusses the bioequivalence of Omnitrope (Sandoz's rhGH biosimilar) and Genotropin (reference rhGH product), assessed in the first 2 clinical phase 1 studies conducted during the development of Omnitrope. Both of these phase 1 studies were randomized, double-blind, crossover studies, each involving 24 healthy volunteers who underwent pituitary somatrope cell down-regulation using octreotide. Three different formulations of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) were compared: Omnitrope lyophilisate, Omnitrope liquid and Genotropin (lyophilized powder for injection). Both pharmacokinetics (area under the curve [AUC], C(max), t(max) and t(1/2)) and pharmacodynamics (serum levels of insulin-like growth factor 1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 and non-esterified fatty acid) were assessed after a single subcutaneous injection of 5 mg rhGH. The 3 formulations had comparable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. All the 90% confidence intervals of the ratios of the least squares means for the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters AUC and C(max) were within the predefined FDA and EMEA acceptance range of 80%-125% for bioequivalence. In addition, a comparative population pharmacokinetic analysis further supports that Omnitrope lyophilisate, Omnitrope liquid and Genotropin can be regarded as equivalent in terms of pharmacokinetics. Therefore, Omnitrope lyophilisate was demonstrated to be bioequivalent to both Genotropin and the Omnitrope liquid formulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20173088     DOI: 10.1177/0091270009359005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  5 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic similarity of biologics: analysis using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling.

Authors:  A Dubois; S Gsteiger; S Balser; E Pigeolet; J L Steimer; G Pillai; F Mentré
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Characterization and comparison of commercially available TNF receptor 2-Fc fusion protein products.

Authors:  Qingqiao Tan; Qingcheng Guo; Chen Fang; Chong Wang; Bohua Li; Hao Wang; Jing Li; Yajun Guo
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 5.857

3.  A novel approach to evaluate the pharmacokinetic biocomparability of a monoclonal antibody derived from two different cell lines using simultaneous crossover design.

Authors:  Chao Han; Thomas S McIntosh; Brian J Geist; Trina Jiao; Thomas A Puchalski; Kenneth M Goldberg; Tong-Yuan Yang; Charles E Pendley; Honghui Zhou; Hugh M Davis
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Update on the safety and bioequivalence of biosimilars - focus on enoxaparin.

Authors:  Walter Jeske; Jeanine M Walenga; Debra Hoppensteadt; Jawed Fareed
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2013-06-10

5.  Perspectives of Hospital Pharmacists Towards Biosimilar Medicines: A Survey of Polish Pharmacy Practice in General Hospitals.

Authors:  Iga Pawłowska; Leszek Pawłowski; Natalia Krzyżaniak; Ivan Kocić
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.807

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.