Literature DB >> 20172989

Effective use of workload and productivity monitoring tools in health-system pharmacy, part 2.

Steve S Rough1, Michael McDaniel, James R Rinehart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The current status of external and internal workload and productivity measurement systems and strategies to improve their use to maximize overall pharmacy department operational performance and staffing effectiveness are described.
SUMMARY: The use of operational benchmarking is increasing within health systems as a tool for continuously measuring and improving departmental performance and evaluating departmental success. Unfortunately, software used for benchmarking purposes is available through a limited number of commercial vendors and consultants, and these systems are unable to effectively measure department operations and overall performance. The theoretical value of benchmarking and productivity measurement systems, including a description of the various definitions, tools, and data sources for comparing pharmacy productivity data, is summarized. The limitations of commercially available vendor productivity monitoring systems and desired strategies for improving their use are also reviewed. Preferred productivity and cost metrics for measuring pharmacy department effectiveness are suggested, and strategies for obtaining value from external and internal productivity monitoring systems are explored.
CONCLUSION: Challenges with external operational benchmarking and internal productivity monitoring systems are numerous. These systems rarely measure the quality of pharmacy services provided and their effect on patient care outcomes and the total cost of care. Benchmarking vendors must modernize their software and develop internal checks to confirm data integrity in order to make their products more useful and reliable. In addition, data supporting the patient care role of the pharmacist should be integrated into all productivity monitoring systems and be used to demonstrate the positive impact of pharmacy services on the total cost and quality of patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20172989     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp090217.p2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  5 in total

1.  Should key performance indicators for clinical services be mandatory?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2011-01

2.  Balanced scorecards as a tool for developing patient-centered pharmacy services.

Authors:  Emmanuel N Enwere; Ellen A Keating; Robert J Weber
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-06

3.  Productivity Tracking: A Survey of Critical Care Pharmacist Practices and Satisfaction.

Authors:  Christy Cecil Forehand; Kathryn Fitton; Kelli Keats; Aaron Chase; Susan E Smith; Andrea Sikora Newsome
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2021-06-16

4.  Development of a system-wide pharmacy operational weighted workload model at a large academic health system.

Authors:  Autumn E Petersen; Jacqueline M Zeeman; Mary-Haston Vest; Daniel H Schenkat; Evan W Colmenares
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Defining clinical pharmacy and support activities indicators for hospital practice using a combined nominal and focus group technique.

Authors:  Hugo Lopes; Andrea Rodrigues Lopes; Helena Farinha; Ana Paula Martins
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2021-06-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.