Literature DB >> 20172877

Health service accreditation as a predictor of clinical and organisational performance: a blinded, random, stratified study.

Jeffrey Braithwaite1, David Greenfield, Johanna Westbrook, Marjorie Pawsey, Mary Westbrook, Robert Gibberd, Justine Naylor, Sally Nathan, Maureen Robinson, Bill Runciman, Margaret Jackson, Joanne Travaglia, Brian Johnston, Desmond Yen, Heather McDonald, Lena Low, Sally Redman, Betty Johnson, Angus Corbett, Darlene Hennessy, John Clark, Judie Lancaster.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of accreditation in many countries, and prevailing beliefs that accreditation is associated with variables contributing to clinical care and organisational outcomes, little systematic research has been conducted to examine its validity as a predictor of healthcare performance.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether accreditation performance is associated with self-reported clinical performance and independent ratings of four aspects of organisational performance.
DESIGN: Independent blinded assessment of these variables in a random, stratified sample of health service organisations. SETTINGS: Acute care: large, medium and small health-service organisations in Australia. Study participants Nineteen health service organisations employing 16 448 staff treating 321 289 inpatients and 1 971 087 non-inpatient services annually, representing approximately 5% of the Australian acute care health system. MAIN MEASURES: Correlations of accreditation performance with organisational culture, organisational climate, consumer involvement, leadership and clinical performance. Results Accreditation performance was significantly positively correlated with organisational culture (rho=0.618, p=0.005) and leadership (rho=0.616, p=0.005). There was a trend between accreditation and clinical performance (rho=0.450, p=0.080). Accreditation was unrelated to organisational climate (rho=0.378, p=0.110) and consumer involvement (rho=0.215, p=0.377).
CONCLUSIONS: Accreditation results predict leadership behaviours and cultural characteristics of healthcare organisations but not organisational climate or consumer participation, and a positive trend between accreditation and clinical performance is noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20172877     DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2009.033928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  40 in total

1.  A program of professional accreditation of hospital wards by the Italian Society of Internal Medicine (SIMI): self- versus peer-evaluation.

Authors:  Massimo Vanoli; Giancarlo Traisci; Alberto Franchini; Gianpiero Benetti; Pietro Serra; Maria Alice Monti
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Investigating organizational quality improvement systems, patient empowerment, organizational culture, professional involvement and the quality of care in European hospitals: the 'Deepening our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe (DUQuE)' project.

Authors:  Oliver Groene; Niek Klazinga; Cordula Wagner; Onyebuchi A Arah; Andrew Thompson; Charles Bruneau; Rosa Suñol
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  A multidimensional framework for rating health system performance and sustainability: A nine plus one ranking system.

Authors:  Laura Müller; Reida El Oakley; Mohammed Saad; Ali H Mokdad; Giamal A Etolhi; Antoine Flahault
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.413

4.  Determinants of successful clinical networks: the conceptual framework and study protocol.

Authors:  Mary Haines; Bernadette Brown; Jonathan Craig; Catherine D'Este; Elizabeth Elliott; Emily Klineberg; Elizabeth McInnes; Sandy Middleton; Christine Paul; Sally Redman; Elizabeth M Yano
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Facilitating the action of community representatives in a health service: the role of a community participation coordinator.

Authors:  Sally Nathan; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Niamh Stephenson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  A multimethod research investigation of consumer involvement in Australian health service accreditation programmes: the ACCREDIT-SCI study protocol.

Authors:  David Greenfield; Reece Hinchcliff; Max Moldovan; Virginia Mumford; Marjorie Pawsey; Johanna Irene Westbrook; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol.

Authors:  Jeffrey Braithwaite; Johanna Westbrook; Brian Johnston; Stephen Clark; Mark Brandon; Margaret Banks; Clifford Hughes; David Greenfield; Marjorie Pawsey; Angus Corbett; Andrew Georgiou; Joanne Callen; John Ovretveit; Catherine Pope; Rosa Suñol; Charles Shaw; Deborah Debono; Mary Westbrook; Reece Hinchcliff; Max Moldovan
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-10-09

8.  Factors that influence the implementation of health and social care Standards: a systematic review and meta-summary protocol.

Authors:  Yvonne Kelly; Niamh O'Rourke; Rachel Flynn; Josephine Hegarty; Laura O'Connor
Journal:  HRB Open Res       Date:  2021-05-24

9.  Evaluation of current Australian health service accreditation processes (ACCREDIT-CAP): protocol for a mixed-method research project.

Authors:  Reece Hinchcliff; David Greenfield; Max Moldovan; Marjorie Pawsey; Virginia Mumford; Johanna Irene Westbrook; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Economic evaluation of Australian acute care accreditation (ACCREDIT-CBA (Acute)): study protocol for a mixed-method research project.

Authors:  Virginia Mumford; David Greenfield; Reece Hinchcliff; Max Moldovan; Kevin Forde; Johanna I Westbrook; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.