| Literature DB >> 20172740 |
Trent J Herda1, Terry J Housh, Andrew C Fry, Joseph P Weir, Brian K Schilling, Eric D Ryan, Joel T Cramer.
Abstract
This study examined the log-transformed mechanomyographic (MMG(RMS)) and electromyographic (EMG(RMS)) amplitude vs. force relationships for aerobically-trained (AT), resistance-trained (RT), and sedentary (SED) individuals. Subjects performed isometric ramp contractions from 5% to 90% maximal voluntary contraction. Muscle biopsies were collected and thigh skinfolds, MMG and EMG were recorded from the vastus lateralis muscle. Linear regression models were fit to the log-transformed EMG(RMS) and MMG(RMS) vs. force relationships. The slope (b coefficient) and the antilog of the y-intercept (a coefficient) were calculated. The AT group had the highest percentage of type I fiber area, the RT group had the highest percentage of type IIa fiber area, and the SED group had the highest percentage of type IIx fiber area. The a coefficients were higher for the AT group than the RT and SED groups in both the MMG(RMS) and EMG(RMS) vs. force relationships, whereas the b coefficients were lower for the AT group than the RT and SED groups only in the MMG(RMS) vs. force relationship. The group differences among the a coefficients may have reflected subcutaneous fat acting as a filter thereby reducing EMG(RMS) and MMG(RMS). The lower b coefficients for the AT group in the MMG(RMS) patterns may have reflected fiber area-related differences in motor unit activation strategies. Published by Elsevier Ltd.Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20172740 DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.01.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol ISSN: 1050-6411 Impact factor: 2.368