OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of surgeon-performed, office-based head and neck ultrasound in facilitating diagnostic fine needle aspiration (FNA) of lesions in the head and neck. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided FNA versus traditional palpation-guided technique for palpable masses in the head and neck. SETTING:An office-based study performed in a military academic medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty-one adults older than 18 years of age with a palpable head and neck mass (less than 3 cm in largest diameter) were randomized to ultrasound-guided or traditional palpation-guided FNA of a head and neck mass. Measured variables and outcomes for the study included tissue adequacy rates, tissue type, and operator variability. RESULTS: Following three passes using either palpation or ultrasound guidance, a comparative tissue adequacy rate of 84 percent for ultrasound guidance versus 58 percent for standard palpation was established (P < 0.014). With regard to tissue type, a statistically significant comparative diagnostic advantage for ultrasound guidance was observed in thyroid tissue while remaining statistically insignificant for lymphatic and salivary tissues. No statistical significance was found when comparing the ability of otolaryngology residents versus attending otolaryngologists to obtain ultrasound-guided diagnostic samples. CONCLUSION: Office-based surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided FNA of palpable lesions in the head and neck yields a statistically significant higher diagnostic rate compared to standard palpation technique. Our institutional experience supports the utility of surgeon-performed ultrasound as a core competency in clinical practice. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of surgeon-performed, office-based head and neck ultrasound in facilitating diagnostic fine needle aspiration (FNA) of lesions in the head and neck. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided FNA versus traditional palpation-guided technique for palpable masses in the head and neck. SETTING: An office-based study performed in a military academic medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty-one adults older than 18 years of age with a palpable head and neck mass (less than 3 cm in largest diameter) were randomized to ultrasound-guided or traditional palpation-guided FNA of a head and neck mass. Measured variables and outcomes for the study included tissue adequacy rates, tissue type, and operator variability. RESULTS: Following three passes using either palpation or ultrasound guidance, a comparative tissue adequacy rate of 84 percent for ultrasound guidance versus 58 percent for standard palpation was established (P < 0.014). With regard to tissue type, a statistically significant comparative diagnostic advantage for ultrasound guidance was observed in thyroid tissue while remaining statistically insignificant for lymphatic and salivary tissues. No statistical significance was found when comparing the ability of otolaryngology residents versus attending otolaryngologists to obtain ultrasound-guided diagnostic samples. CONCLUSION: Office-based surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided FNA of palpable lesions in the head and neck yields a statistically significant higher diagnostic rate compared to standard palpation technique. Our institutional experience supports the utility of surgeon-performed ultrasound as a core competency in clinical practice. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: V M Reddy; W O Bennett; E Bassett; D J Cunliffe; L C Fryer; P H Reece; S A Hickey Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 1.951
Authors: Andre Isaac; Caroline C Jeffery; Hadi Seikaly; Hani Al-Marzouki; Jeffrey R Harris; Daniel A O'Connell Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2014-12-03