BACKGROUND: Within recent years, more marginal donors have been offered to Eurotransplant. To help identify suitable pancreas donors, the Eurotransplant Pancreas Advisory Committee introduced a donor score system (P-PASS). Little is known about the influence of P-PASS on long-term pancreas graft survival. METHODS: From June 1994 to September 2009, we performed 405 pancreas transplantations. In a retrospective study we analyzed P-PASS in 318 cases. Pancreas grafts from donors with P-PASS < 17 (n = 146) analyzed for graft and patient survival as well as for surgical complications were compared with donors of a PASS > or = 17 (n = 172). The mean follow-up was 7.2 +/- 4.3 years. RESULTS: Recipient characteristics were comparable in both groups. Mean P-PASS was 16.7 +/- 2.7 for both groups: 14.3 +/- 1.5 for P-PASS < 17 and 18.8 +/- 1.6 for P-PASS > or = 17. Pancreas graft survival rates for 1, 5, and 10 years were 85%, 77%, and 73% among P-PASS < 17 and 81%, 73%, and 64% among P-PASS > or = 17 groups (P = .12). There were 12 (8.2%) cases of venous thrombosis in the <17 group and 22 (12.7%) in the > or =17 group (P < .05). The relaparotomy rate was significant higher (38.7% vs 28.7%) and duration of hospital treatment longer (40.2 vs 32 days) in the P-PASS > or = 17 group (P < .05). There was no significant difference in patient or kidney graft survival between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrated that utilization of pancreas grafts from donors with a P-PASS > or = 17 resulted in good overall outcomes and could expand the organ donor pool. There was no correlation between P-PASS and long-term patient or graft outcome. Complications requiring relaparotomy were more frequent among patients after transplantation from donors with higher P-PASS.
BACKGROUND: Within recent years, more marginal donors have been offered to Eurotransplant. To help identify suitable pancreas donors, the Eurotransplant Pancreas Advisory Committee introduced a donor score system (P-PASS). Little is known about the influence of P-PASS on long-term pancreas graft survival. METHODS: From June 1994 to September 2009, we performed 405 pancreas transplantations. In a retrospective study we analyzed P-PASS in 318 cases. Pancreas grafts from donors with P-PASS < 17 (n = 146) analyzed for graft and patient survival as well as for surgical complications were compared with donors of a PASS > or = 17 (n = 172). The mean follow-up was 7.2 +/- 4.3 years. RESULTS: Recipient characteristics were comparable in both groups. Mean P-PASS was 16.7 +/- 2.7 for both groups: 14.3 +/- 1.5 for P-PASS < 17 and 18.8 +/- 1.6 for P-PASS > or = 17. Pancreas graft survival rates for 1, 5, and 10 years were 85%, 77%, and 73% among P-PASS < 17 and 81%, 73%, and 64% among P-PASS > or = 17 groups (P = .12). There were 12 (8.2%) cases of venous thrombosis in the <17 group and 22 (12.7%) in the > or =17 group (P < .05). The relaparotomy rate was significant higher (38.7% vs 28.7%) and duration of hospital treatment longer (40.2 vs 32 days) in the P-PASS > or = 17 group (P < .05). There was no significant difference in patient or kidney graft survival between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrated that utilization of pancreas grafts from donors with a P-PASS > or = 17 resulted in good overall outcomes and could expand the organ donor pool. There was no correlation between P-PASS and long-term patient or graft outcome. Complications requiring relaparotomy were more frequent among patients after transplantation from donors with higher P-PASS.
Authors: Glauco Adrieno Westphal; Valter Duro Garcia; Rafael Lisboa de Souza; Cristiano Augusto Franke; Kalinca Daberkow Vieira; Viviane Renata Zaclikevis Birckholz; Miriam Cristine Machado; Eliana Régia Barbosa de Almeida; Fernando Osni Machado; Luiz Antônio da Costa Sardinha; Raquel Wanzuita; Carlos Eduardo Soares Silvado; Gerson Costa; Vera Braatz; Milton Caldeira Filho; Rodrigo Furtado; Luana Alves Tannous; André Gustavo Neves de Albuquerque; Edson Abdala Journal: Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Date: 2016-09
Authors: E B Finger; D M Radosevich; T B Dunn; S Chinnakotla; D E R Sutherland; A J Matas; T L Pruett; R Kandaswamy Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Mohamad Samim Ayami; Sascha Grzella; Stylianos Kykalos; Richard Viebahn; Peter Schenker Journal: Ann Transplant Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 1.530
Authors: Kaja Śmigielska; Paweł Skrzypek; Jarosław Czerwiński; Grzegorz Michalak; Marek Durlik; Tadeusz Grochowiecki; Sławomir Nazarewski; Jacek Szmidt; Jacek Ziaja; Robert Król; Lech Cierpka; Wojciech Lisik; Maciej Kosieradzki Journal: Ann Transplant Date: 2018-05-25 Impact factor: 1.530
Authors: Andrea Proneth; Andreas A Schnitzbauer; Florian Zeman; Johanna R Foerster; Ines Holub; Helmut Arbogast; Wolf O Bechstein; Thomas Becker; Carsten Dietz; Markus Guba; Michael Heise; Sven Jonas; Stephan Kersting; Jürgen Klempnauer; Steffen Manekeller; Volker Müller; Silvio Nadalin; Björn Nashan; Andreas Pascher; Falk Rauchfuss; Michael A Ströhlein; Peter Schemmer; Peter Schenker; Stefan Thorban; Thomas Vogel; Axel O Rahmel; Richard Viebahn; Bernhard Banas; Edward K Geissler; Hans J Schlitt; Stefan A Farkas Journal: Transplant Res Date: 2013-07-01