Literature DB >> 20172249

Debunking the myth of the hard-to-reach farmer: effective communication on udder health.

J Jansen1, C D M Steuten, R J Renes, N Aarts, T J G M Lam.   

Abstract

Worldwide, programs to control mastitis are implemented using different strategies to reach farmers. Even though education materials and best practices may be technically optimal, they need to be used to be successful. Thus, effective communication with farmers is essential in order to change their behavior and to improve their farm management. During a Dutch national mastitis control program, a substantial number of farmers seemed to be hard to reach with information on udder health. Consequently, this study was designed to provide insight into the attitude and motivation of such farmers. In the period of October 2007 to July 2008, 24 in-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted with farmers whose veterinarians considered to be difficult to approach with advice on udder health management (8 practices, 3 farmers from each practice). The interviews included questions about the farms and the farmers, their attitude and behavior regarding mastitis, and their information sources and social environment. The results show that so-called hard-to-reach farmers were not always badly informed about udder health and did not always experience problems with mastitis. These ostensibly unreachable farmers were not a homogeneous group, but rather could be divided into 4 categories based on their trust in external information sources regarding mastitis and their orientation toward the outside world: proactivists, do-it-yourselfers, wait-and-see-ers, and reclusive traditionalists. There are ample opportunities to reach hard-to-reach farmers, provided that the communication strategies are tailored to their specific needs. There is especially much to gain in communication with do-it-yourselfers and wait-and-see-ers, but this demands a more proactive role on the part of veterinarians and extension specialists. Different types of farmers need to be approached in different ways and through different channels with information on udder health. Consequently, this study can contribute to the optimization of future programs designed to control and prevent diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20172249     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  19 in total

1.  Survey of Saskatchewan beef cattle producers regarding management practices and veterinary service usage.

Authors:  Murray Jelinski; John Campbell; Steven Hendrick; Cheryl Waldner
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Effect of attire on client perceptions of veterinarians.

Authors:  E Bentley; H Kellihan; C Longhurst; R Chun
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.688

3.  Prevalence of and factors associated with swellings of the ribs in tie stall housed dairy cows in Germany.

Authors:  Greta E Abele; Yury Zablotski; Melanie Feist; K Charlotte Jensen; Annegret Stock; Amely Campe; Roswitha Merle; Andreas W Oehm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Communication in production animal medicine: modelling a complex interaction with the example of dairy herd health medicine.

Authors:  Joachim L Kleen; Owen Atkinson; Jos Ptm Noordhuizen
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.146

5.  Why do farmers and veterinarians not report all bovine abortions, as requested by the clinical brucellosis surveillance system in France?

Authors:  Anne Bronner; Viviane Hénaux; Nicolas Fortané; Pascal Hendrikx; Didier Calavas
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Control of Staphylococcus aureus in dairy herds in a region with raw milk cheese production: farmers' attitudes, knowledge, behaviour and belief in self-efficacy.

Authors:  Marie-Eve Cousin; Maria Christina Härdi-Landerer; Verena Völk; Michèle Bodmer
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  The future of veterinary communication: Partnership or persuasion? A qualitative investigation of veterinary communication in the pursuit of client behaviour change.

Authors:  Alison M Bard; David C J Main; Anne M Haase; Helen R Whay; Emma J Roe; Kristen K Reyher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The RESET Mindset Model applied on decreasing antibiotic usage in dairy cattle in the Netherlands.

Authors:  T J G M Lam; J Jansen; R J Wessels
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.146

9.  How does reviewing the evidence change veterinary surgeons' beliefs regarding the treatment of ovine footrot? A quantitative and qualitative study.

Authors:  Helen M Higgins; Laura E Green; Martin J Green; Jasmeet Kaler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  From "One Health" to "One Communication": The Contribution of Communication in Veterinary Medicine to Public Health.

Authors:  Micaela Cipolla; Luigi Bonizzi; Alfonso Zecconi
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2015-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.