Literature DB >> 20172238

Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population.

G Su1, B Guldbrandtsen, V R Gregersen, M S Lund.   

Abstract

This study investigated the reliability of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) in the Danish Holstein population. The data in the analysis included 3,330 bulls with both published conventional EBV and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. After data editing, 38,134 SNP markers were available. In the analysis, all SNP were fitted simultaneously as random effects in a Bayesian variable selection model, which allows heterogeneous variances for different SNP markers. The response variables were the official EBV. Direct GEBV were calculated as the sum of individual SNP effects. Initial analyses of 4 index traits were carried out to compare models with different intensities of shrinkage for SNP effects; that is, mixture prior distributions of scaling factors (standard deviation of SNP effects) assuming 5, 10, 20, or 50% of SNP having large effects and the others having very small or no effects, and a single prior distribution common for all SNP. It was found that, in general, the model with a common prior distribution of scaling factors had better predictive ability than any mixture prior models. Therefore, a common prior model was used to estimate SNP effects and breeding values for all 18 index traits. Reliability of GEBV was assessed by squared correlation between GEBV and conventional EBV (r(2)(GEBV, EBV)), and expected reliability was obtained from prediction error variance using a 5-fold cross validation. Squared correlations between GEBV and published EBV (without any adjustment) ranged from 0.252 to 0.700, with an average of 0.418. Expected reliabilities ranged from 0.494 to 0.733, with an average of 0.546. Averaged over 18 traits, r(2)(GEBV, EBV) was 0.13 higher and expected reliability was 0.26 higher than reliability of conventional parent average. The results indicate that genomic selection can greatly improve the accuracy of preselection for young bulls compared with traditional selection based on parent average information.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20172238     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  27 in total

1.  Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction in Chinese Holstein cattle by using one-step blending.

Authors:  Xiujin Li; Sheng Wang; Ju Huang; Leyi Li; Qin Zhang; Xiangdong Ding
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 4.297

2.  Comparison of joint versus purebred genomic evaluation in the French multi-breed dairy goat population.

Authors:  Céline Carillier; Hélène Larroque; Christèle Robert-Granié
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Efficiency of genomic selection using Bayesian multi-marker models for traits selected to reflect a wide range of heritabilities and frequencies of detected quantitative traits loci in mice.

Authors:  Dagmar N R G Kapell; Daniel Sorensen; Guosheng Su; Luc L G Janss; Cheryl J Ashworth; Rainer Roehe
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 2.797

4.  Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population.

Authors:  Hongding Gao; Ole F Christensen; Per Madsen; Ulrik S Nielsen; Yuan Zhang; Mogens S Lund; Guosheng Su
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.

Authors:  Guosheng Su; Ole F Christensen; Tage Ostersen; Mark Henryon; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using K-means clustering for cross-validation.

Authors:  Mahdi Saatchi; Mathew C McClure; Stephanie D McKay; Megan M Rolf; JaeWoo Kim; Jared E Decker; Tasia M Taxis; Richard H Chapple; Holly R Ramey; Sally L Northcutt; Stewart Bauck; Brent Woodward; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Robert D Schnabel; Dorian J Garrick; Jeremy F Taylor
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  A common reference population from four European Holstein populations increases reliability of genomic predictions.

Authors:  Mogens S Lund; Adrianus P W de Roos; Alfred G de Vries; Tom Druet; Vincent Ducrocq; Sébastien Fritz; François Guillaume; Bernt Guldbrandtsen; Zenting Liu; Reinhard Reents; Chris Schrooten; Franz Seefried; Guosheng Su
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Deregressed EBV as the response variable yield more reliable genomic predictions than traditional EBV in pure-bred pigs.

Authors:  Tage Ostersen; Ole F Christensen; Mark Henryon; Bjarne Nielsen; Guosheng Su; Per Madsen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped.

Authors:  Ole F Christensen; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Accuracy of direct genomic breeding values for nationally evaluated traits in US Limousin and Simmental beef cattle.

Authors:  Mahdi Saatchi; Robert D Schnabel; Megan M Rolf; Jeremy F Taylor; Dorian J Garrick
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.