Literature DB >> 20171476

Individual design and rapid prototyping in reconstruction of orbital wall defects.

Wei Tang1, Lijuan Guo, Jie Long, Hang Wang, Yunfeng Lin, Lei Liu, Weidong Tian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the application of individual digital design and rapid prototyping in the reconstruction of orbital wall defects for different stages of orbital volume (OV) changes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unilateral post-traumatic orbital defects underwent individual digital design and rapid prototyping to manufacture specific titanium mesh implants to create ideal OV recovery. Features of orbital wall fracture deformities and OV changes were analyzed and measured with 3-Dimensional Medical Surface Rendering image software system.
RESULTS: Most cases involving enophthalmos and diplopia were rectified, except for 5 cases of enophthalmos and 2 cases of diplopia with fresh fractures and 11 cases of enophthalmos and 7 cases of diplopia cases with old fractures. Ocular movements and facial malformations were improved. The OV values between the uninjured and injured sides had a significant deviation (P < .05). The degree of enophthalmos had no significant deviation with OV changes pre- and postoperatively in the early fracture stages. The degree of enophthalmos in the old fracture stages had a significant deviation with OV changes pre- and postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that orbital wall fractures can be diagnosed in early fracture stages and that the degree of long-term enophthalmos can be predicted with 3-Dimensional Medical Surface Rendering software. Our results suggest that early-stage orbital wall fractures should recover OV as early as possible, and that advanced stage orbital wall fractures should overcorrect OV. The degree of accuracy and rational of OV reconstruction can be improved by appropriate individual digitalization design and rapid prototyping technology. Copyright (c) 2010 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20171476     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  7 in total

1.  Orbital Wall Reconstruction with Two-Piece Puzzle 3D Printed Implants: Technical Note.

Authors:  Maurice Y Mommaerts; Michael Büttner; Herman Vercruysse; Lauri Wauters; Maikel Beerens
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-09-02

2.  Rapid prototyping technology in orbital floor reconstruction: application in three patients.

Authors:  Christopher G T Lim; Duncan I Campbell; Don M Clucas
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-02-25

3.  Use of a Three-Dimensional Model to Optimize a MEDPOR Implant for Delayed Reconstruction of a Suprastructure Maxillectomy Defect.

Authors:  Anthony Echo; Erik M Wolfswinkel; William Weathers; Aisha McKnight; Shayan Izaddoost
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-09-26

Review 4.  3D modeling, custom implants and its future perspectives in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Jayanthi Parthasarathy
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01

Review 5.  3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Philip Tack; Jan Victor; Paul Gemmel; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Applications of Computer Technology in Complex Craniofacial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kristopher M Day; Kyle S Gabrick; Larry A Sargent
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-03-06

Review 7.  Establishing a point-of-care additive manufacturing workflow for clinical use.

Authors:  Georges E Daoud; Dante L Pezzutti; Calvin J Dolatowski; Ricardo L Carrau; Mary Pancake; Edward Herderick; Kyle K VanKoevering
Journal:  J Mater Res       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.089

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.