OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of diagnostic speed and the waiting time before surgery on the psychological well-being of patients in breast disease clinics. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study METHOD: Women with suspected breast cancer completed questionnaires about their psychological well-being before the first outpatient clinic visit (time T1: with malignancy (n = 149); without malignancy (n = 515)), shortly after diagnosis (T2: n = 96 and n = 432, respectively) and 2-3 months later (T3: with malignancy (n = 139)). Two months after the end of treatment (T4: with malignancy (n = 202)), women with breast cancer indicated which period they considered most stressful in retrospect. Diagnostic speed and the waiting time before surgery were categorized and the relation with well-being was examined. Analyses were controlled for age and cancer stage. RESULTS: Although the period before diagnosis was experienced as stressful, diagnostic speed did not affect emotional well-being after a breast cancer diagnosis. However, a diagnosis that took a long time (> 2 weeks) did affect the emotional well-being of women who were not diagnosed with breast cancer. These women were worried and distressed for a longer period of time after diagnosis than women who received the favourable news sooner. The length of the waiting time before surgery did not affect the emotional well-being of patients thereafter: women who had surgery within two weeks were not worse or better off than women who had to wait longer. Yet, patients' emotional well-being did improve considerably after surgery, which indicates that short waiting times might shorten a period of psychological distress. CONCLUSION: The results support a speedy diagnosis and surgery. There was no support for short waiting times having a negative psychological effect.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of diagnostic speed and the waiting time before surgery on the psychological well-being of patients in breast disease clinics. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study METHOD:Women with suspected breast cancer completed questionnaires about their psychological well-being before the first outpatient clinic visit (time T1: with malignancy (n = 149); without malignancy (n = 515)), shortly after diagnosis (T2: n = 96 and n = 432, respectively) and 2-3 months later (T3: with malignancy (n = 139)). Two months after the end of treatment (T4: with malignancy (n = 202)), women with breast cancer indicated which period they considered most stressful in retrospect. Diagnostic speed and the waiting time before surgery were categorized and the relation with well-being was examined. Analyses were controlled for age and cancer stage. RESULTS: Although the period before diagnosis was experienced as stressful, diagnostic speed did not affect emotional well-being after a breast cancer diagnosis. However, a diagnosis that took a long time (> 2 weeks) did affect the emotional well-being of women who were not diagnosed with breast cancer. These women were worried and distressed for a longer period of time after diagnosis than women who received the favourable news sooner. The length of the waiting time before surgery did not affect the emotional well-being of patients thereafter: women who had surgery within two weeks were not worse or better off than women who had to wait longer. Yet, patients' emotional well-being did improve considerably after surgery, which indicates that short waiting times might shorten a period of psychological distress. CONCLUSION: The results support a speedy diagnosis and surgery. There was no support for short waiting times having a negative psychological effect.
Authors: Aisha S Sie; Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams; Liesbeth Spruijt; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Han G Brunner; Judith B Prins; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Maarten W Barentsz; Hester Wessels; Paul J van Diest; Ruud M Pijnappel; Carmen C van der Pol; Arjen J Witkamp; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Helena M Verkooijen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joris P Bulte; Altuna Halilovic; Lambert J M Burgers; Coos J M Diepenbroek; Robin A K de la Roij; Ritse M Mann; Marloes van der Leest; Patricia H J van Cleef; Luc J A Strobbe; Johannes H W de Wilt; Peter Bult Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Judith C Booij; Marieke Zegers; Pauline M P J Evers; Michelle Hendriks; Diana M J Delnoij; Jany J D J M Rademakers Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Aisha S Sie; Liesbeth Spruijt; Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Marjolijn J Ligtenberg; Han G Brunner; Judith B Prins; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: William W Phillips; Jessica Copeland; Sophie C Hofferberth; Julee R Armitage; Sam Fox; Margaret Kruithoff; Claire de Forcrand; Paul J Catalano; Christopher S Lathan; Joel S Weissman; David D Odell; Yolonda L Colson Journal: Healthc (Amst) Date: 2021-06-26