Literature DB >> 20170320

Influence of maternal asthma and asthma severity on newborn morphometry.

Julie S Moldenhauer1, Yinglei Lai, Michael Schatz, Robert Wise, Mark B Landon, Roger B Newman, Dwight J Rouse, Hyagriv N Simhan, Kenneth J Leveno, Menachem Miodovnik, Marshall D Lindheimer, Ronald J Wapner, Michael W Varner, Mary Jo O'Sullivan, Deborah L Conway.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if maternal asthma or asthma severity affects newborn morphometry. STUDY
DESIGN: A secondary analysis was performed on data collected in a multicenter prospective observational cohort study of asthma in pregnancy. Patients enrolled included women with asthma stratified by severity of disease and controls. Asthma severity was defined according to the classification proposed by the National Asthma Education Program (NAEP) Report of the Working Group on Asthma and Pregnancy, modified to include medication requirements. Newborn morphometry measurements included birth weight (BW) and multiples of the median birth weight (BW-MOM), head circumference (HC), length (L), HC:BW ratio, and ponderal index (PI).
RESULTS: Of 2480 patients there were 828 nonasthmatic controls, 828 with mild, 775 with moderate, and 49 with severe disease. Comparing all groups, there were statistically significant differences in maternal age (p < .001), race (p = .005), parity (p = .006), prepregnancy weight (p = .028), and medical care source (p = .001), with the severe asthma group having the highest mean maternal age (25.7 years), and proportion of African Americans (71.4%), proportion of multiparous patients (63.3%), and proportion of patients receiving government assistance (85.7%). When the control group was excluded from the comparisons, differences in prepregnancy weight and medical care source were no longer significant. BW-MOM and L did not differ between groups. The HC:BW ratio increased with asthma severity (p = .029) and was increased compared to controls (p = .010). This remained significant after controlling for confounding variables (both p <.001). HC was statistically significantly different between all groups (p = .032), as well as among women with varying degrees of asthma severity (p = .013), which was not clinically significant. After covariates adjustment, HC was not significantly different among all groups (p = .228), nor the asthma groups (p = .144).
CONCLUSION: Asthma severity is associated with an increased HC:BW ratio. Severity was not found to impact HC, BW-MOM, L, or PI independently. However, the magnitudes of the effects were too small to suggest a clinically significant effect of asthma on neonatal morphometry in this large prospectively studied sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20170320      PMCID: PMC4349430          DOI: 10.3109/02770900903483774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Asthma        ISSN: 0277-0903            Impact factor:   2.515


  14 in total

1.  Effects of altitude versus economic status on birth weight and body shape at birth.

Authors:  D A Giussani; P S Phillips; S Anstee; D J Barker
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Birth weight and altitude: a study in Peruvian communities.

Authors:  J P Mortola; P B Frappell; L Aguero; K Armstrong
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Fetal biometry at 4300 m compared to sea level in Peru.

Authors:  E Krampl; C Lees; J M Bland; J Espinoza Dorado; G Moscoso; S Campbell
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  The effect of high altitude and other risk factors on birthweight: independent or interactive effects?

Authors:  G M Jensen; L G Moore
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  A United States national reference for fetal growth.

Authors:  G R Alexander; J H Himes; R B Kaufman; J Mor; M Kogan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Tibetan protection from intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and reproductive loss at high altitude.

Authors:  L G Moore; D Young; R E McCullough; T Droma; S Zamudio
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.937

7.  Maternal asthma and pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  S Liu; S W Wen; K Demissie; S Marcoux; M S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Perinatal outcomes in women with asthma during pregnancy.

Authors:  S Alexander; L Dodds; B A Armson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Perinatal outcomes in the pregnancies of asthmatic women: a prospective controlled analysis.

Authors:  M Schatz; R S Zeiger; C P Hoffman; K Harden; A Forsythe; L Chilingar; B Saunders; R Porreco; W Sperling; M Kagnoff
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Infant and maternal outcomes in the pregnancies of asthmatic women.

Authors:  K Demissie; M B Breckenridge; G G Rhoads
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 21.405

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Fetal programming: Early-life modulations that affect adult outcomes.

Authors:  Nathan Drever; George R Saade; Egle Bytautiene
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.806

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.