Literature DB >> 20169573

Screened individuals' preferences in the delivery of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

P J E Holt1, P Gogalniceanu, S Murray, J D Poloniecki, I M Loftus, M M Thompson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine preferences for service attributes in a population screened for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to encompass various aspects of service provision. Questions were calibrated against the time an individual was willing to travel to access specific attributes. Subjects attending an aneurysm screening programme were asked to complete a questionnaire before their screening ultrasound scan. Statistical analysis was through pairwise analysis of the median travel times with the signed rank test. The Wilcoxon rank sum, analysed by the Kruskal-Wallis test, was used to compare preference ratings.
RESULTS: A total of 262 individuals were asked to complete the questionnaire; the response rate was 98.5 per cent. Approximately 92 per cent of individuals stated a willingness to travel for at least 1 h beyond their nearest hospital in order to access services with a 5 per cent lower perioperative mortality rate, a 2 per cent lower amputation or stroke rate, a high annual caseload of aneurysm repairs, and routine availability of endovascular repair.
CONCLUSION: Patients attending aneurysm screening were willing to travel beyond their nearest hospital to access a service with better outcomes, higher surgical volumes and endovascular surgery. Copyright (c) 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20169573     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  5 in total

Review 1.  A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.

Authors:  Inger M Janssen; Ansgar Gerhardus; Milly A Schröer-Günther; Fülöp Scheibler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  The effect of centralization of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair procedures on perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Kosmas I Paraskevas
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

Review 3.  A Systematic Review of the Factors that Patients Use to Choose their Surgeon.

Authors:  Alexander T Yahanda; Kelly J Lafaro; Gaya Spolverato; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Is Age a Determinant Factor in EVAR as a Predictor of Outcomes or in the Selection Procedure? Our Experience.

Authors:  Rui Machado; Gabriela Teixeira; Pedro Oliveira; Luís Loureiro; Carlos Pereira; Rui Almeida
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-04

5.  Distance travelled to hospital for emergency laparotomy and the effect of travel time on mortality: cohort study.

Authors:  Tom Salih; Peter Martin; Tom Poulton; Charles M Oliver; Mike G Bassett; S Ramani Moonesinghe
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 7.035

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.