Literature DB >> 2016815

Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound.

M K Terris1, T A Stamey.   

Abstract

Estimation of prostate gland volume with transrectal ultrasound may provide important information in the evaluation of benign and malignant prostatic diseases. To determine the most accurate means of volume estimation 150 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound with 15 separate methods of volume estimation. All patients underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy or cystoprostatectomy. Prostate specimen weights were compared with the results of each volume estimation method. Step-section planimetry, previously assumed to be the most accurate means of volume measurement, exhibited a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.93. The elliptical volume, widely used as an alternative to planimetry, demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.90. The most accurate method to estimate prostate weight (r = 0.94) was a variation of the prolate spheroid formula, expressed as pi/6 (transverse dimension)2 (anteroposterior dimension). When different volume ranges were considered, this prolate spheroid formula provided the closest estimate of weight in glands of less than 40 gm. and those in the 40 to 80 gm. range. The most accurate method to estimate prostates weighing greater than 80 gm. was the formula pi/6 (transverse dimension)3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2016815     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38508-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  62 in total

1.  Differential alternative splicing of human transglutaminase 4 in benign prostate hyperplasia and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sung-Yup Cho; Kyungho Choi; Ju-Hong Jeon; Chai-Wan Kim; Dong-Myung Shin; Jong Bouk Lee; Sang Eun Lee; Choung-Soo Kim; Jeong-Soo Park; Eui Man Jeong; Gi-Yong Jang; Kye-Yong Song; In-Gyu Kim
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 8.718

2.  Percent tumor volume predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multi-institutional data analysis.

Authors:  Cheryn Song; Seongil Seo; Hanjong Ahn; Seok-Soo Byun; Jin Seon Cho; Young Deuk Choi; Eunsik Lee; Hyun Moo Lee; Sang Eun Lee; Han Yong Choi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Assessment of change in prostate volume and shape following surgical resection through co-registration of in-vivo MRI and fresh specimen ex-vivo MRI.

Authors:  C Orczyk; S S Taneja; H Rusinek; A B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  The value of prostatic specific antigen density in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ch Deliveliotis; G Louras; P Kyriazis; A Gyftopoulos; L Louka; E Alargof
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Prostate volume growth rate changes over time: Results from men 18 to 92 years old in a longitudinal community-based study.

Authors:  Si-Hui Li; Qun-Fang Yang; Pei-Yuan Zuo; Yu-Wei Liu; Yu-Hua Liao; Cheng-Yun Liu
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-12-07

6.  Prostate-specific antigen density--a reliable parameter for the detection of prostate cancer?

Authors:  W F Thon; F Gadban; M C Truss; M Kuczyk; U Hartmann; U Jonas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Diagnostic significance of [-2]pro-PSA and prostate dimension-adjusted PSA-related indices in men with total PSA in the 2.0-10.0 ng/mL range.

Authors:  Kazuto Ito; Mai Miyakubo; Yoshitaka Sekine; Hidekazu Koike; Hiroshi Matsui; Yasuhiro Shibata; Kazuhiro Suzuki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Prostate volume measurement by TRUS using heights obtained by transaxial and midsagittal scanning: comparison with specimen volume following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  S B Park; J K Kim; S H Choi; H N Noh; E K Ji; K S Cho
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Modalities for imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H Hou; D Swanson; A B Barqawi
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-03-17

10.  Correlations between the various methods of estimating prostate volume: transabdominal, transrectal, and three-dimensional US.

Authors:  Sun Ho Kim; Seung Hyup Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.