Literature DB >> 20168132

Intracortical excitability after repetitive hand movements is differentially affected in cortical versus subcortical strokes.

Caroline I E Renner1, Margot Schubert, Monique Jahn, Horst Hummelsheim.   

Abstract

Repetitive training of isolated movements induces reorganization of motor cortical representations. To elucidate the mechanisms of practice-dependent cortical plasticity within the lesioned central motor system at the time of the application of a therapeutic intervention, we examined the effect of repetitive movements on intracortical facilitation (ICF) and inhibition of agonist (extensor carpi radialis [ECR]) and antagonist (flexor carpi ulnaris) muscles of the hand shortly after the movements, by the paired-pulse technique in patients with cortical (n = 9) and subcortical strokes (n = 11). Short intracortical inhibition and ICF were studied by using interstimulus intervals of 2 and 8 milliseconds, respectively, and their interaction with active or passive movement. The active movement produced significantly larger motor-evoked potentials in the ECR muscle in both patient groups. Short intracortical inhibition was particularly decreased after cortical stroke, whereas it was still significant after subcortical stroke. ICF increased significantly after movements compared with rest in the ECR for subcortical stroke patients only. We conclude that repetitive active movements increase the excitability of the motor cortex representing the agonist muscle and interact with intracortical facilitatory circuits in the subcortical stroke group but not in the cortical stroke group. This interaction of circuitry has been reported previously in control subjects and seems to still operate after subcortical stroke during active movement. Alternative networks may be recruited for active movement after cortical stroke. This finding proposes lesion-specific mechanisms of reorganization during the same rehabilitative intervention. Distinct rehabilitative strategies may be required to optimize the activation of the physiologic motor network for different lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20168132     DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e3181baaa86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  5 in total

1.  Anatomy and physiology predict response to motor cortex stimulation after stroke.

Authors:  Sarvenaz Nouri; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Neural function, injury, and stroke subtype predict treatment gains after stroke.

Authors:  Erin Burke Quinlan; Lucy Dodakian; Jill See; Alison McKenzie; Vu Le; Mike Wojnowicz; Babak Shahbaba; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Neural Patterns of Reorganization after Intensive Robot-Assisted Virtual Reality Therapy and Repetitive Task Practice in Patients with Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Soha Saleh; Gerard Fluet; Qinyin Qiu; Alma Merians; Sergei V Adamovich; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Does Measurement of Corticospinal Tract Involvement Add Value to Clinical Behavioral Biomarkers in Predicting Motor Recovery after Stroke?

Authors:  Jong Youb Lim; Mi-Kyoung Oh; Jihong Park; Nam-Jong Paik
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 5.  Resting motor threshold in the course of hand motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jitka Veldema; Dennis Alexander Nowak; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 4.262

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.