Literature DB >> 20168112

Array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic evaluation of fetal loss between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation.

Jennifer E Warren1, David K Turok, Teresa M Maxwell, Arthur R Brothman, Robert M Silver.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate genomic copy number changes in fetal loss between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation using array comparative genomic hybridization.
METHODS: This was a prospective series of 35 women who experienced pregnancy loss between 10-20 weeks of gestation with either normal karyotype (n=9) or no conventional cytogenetic testing (n=26). DNA was isolated from fetal tissue and parental blood. Array comparative genomic hybridization was performed on DNA from fetal tissue using a whole genome BAC array chip. Copy number changes in fetal tissue were then compared against databases of benign copy number changes. Parental DNA was analyzed using the same BAC array in cases that contained suspected pathogenic copy number changes. In cases where de novo copy number changes were detected in fetal DNA, further characterization was performed using a 244K oligonucleotide microarray.
RESULTS: DNA was successfully isolated in 30 of 35 (86%) of cases. Array comparative genomic hybridization was performed in all of these. De novo copy number changes were detected in six (20%) cases using the Spectral chip and confirmed in four (13%) cases using the Agilent chip. These ranged in size from 93-289 Kb and mapped on 5p, 13q and Xq22. In the cases with de novo copy number changes, the higher-density Agilent array detected additional changes (20-1,310 Kb).
CONCLUSION: Array comparative genomic hybridization detected de novo copy number changes in 13% of cases where routine cytogenetic testing was normal or not performed. These involved large regions of DNA and may provide novel explanations for some cases of otherwise unexplained pregnancy loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20168112     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bc6ab0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  8 in total

1.  Genomic characteristics of miscarriage copy number variants.

Authors:  Hani Bagheri; Eloi Mercier; Ying Qiao; Mary D Stephenson; Evica Rajcan-Separovic
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.025

2.  Genome-wide array-based copy number profiling in human placentas from unexplained stillbirths.

Authors:  R Alan Harris; Francesca Ferrari; Shay Ben-Shachar; Xiaoling Wang; George Saade; Ignatia Van Den Veyver; Fabio Facchinetti; Kjersti Aagaard-Tillery
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Genetic abnormalities and pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Nathan R Blue; Jessica M Page; Robert M Silver
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.300

4.  Differentiation of genetic abnormalities in early pregnancy loss.

Authors:  S T Romero; K B Geiersbach; C N Paxton; N C Rose; E F Schisterman; D W Branch; R M Silver
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth.

Authors:  Uma M Reddy; Grier P Page; George R Saade; Robert M Silver; Vanessa R Thorsten; Corette B Parker; Halit Pinar; Marian Willinger; Barbara J Stoll; Josefine Heim-Hall; Michael W Varner; Robert L Goldenberg; Radek Bukowski; Ronald J Wapner; Carolyn D Drews-Botsch; Barbara M O'Brien; Donald J Dudley; Brynn Levy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Incidence of the 22q11.2 deletion in a large cohort of miscarriage samples.

Authors:  Melissa K Maisenbacher; Katrina Merrion; Barbara Pettersen; Michael Young; Kiyoung Paik; Sushma Iyengar; Stephanie Kareht; Styrmir Sigurjonsson; Zachary P Demko; Kimberly A Martin
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Aneusomy detection with Karyolite-Bac on Beads® is a cost-efficient and high throughput strategy in the molecular analyses of the early pregnancy conception losses.

Authors:  Javier Pérez-Durán; Zenyese Nájera; Yanelly Trujillo-Cabrera; Mónica Martín-Saro; Ethel García-Latorre; Jaime Escarcega-Preciado; Nayelli Nájera; Teresa Martínez-Galaviz; Gloria Queipo
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Best diagnostic approach for the genetic evaluation of fetuses after intrauterine death in first, second or third trimester: QF-PCR, karyotyping and/or genome wide SNP array analysis.

Authors:  Angelique Ja Kooper; Brigitte Hw Faas; Ilse Feenstra; Nicole de Leeuw; Dominique Fcm Smeets
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.009

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.