BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Telestroke has been effective in the management of acute ischemic stroke. This study characterizes and compares stroke specialist (SS) and emergency physician (EP) perceptions of telestroke and identifies barriers preventing increased implementation. METHODS: A survey was developed and distributed nationwide to 382 SSs through an online survey system and in paper form to 226 EPs attending the 2008 American College of Emergency Physicians national conference. RESULTS: Stroke specialists perceived themselves to be more knowledgeable about telemedicine and telestroke (P<0.001 and P=0.010, respectively). A large majority of physicians in both specialties either strongly agreed or agreed that telestroke will reduce geographical differences in stroke management and that it is superior to telephone consultation. EPs perceived patient preference (P<0.001), recombinant tissue plasminogen activator side effects (P<0.001), level of technology (P=0.005), and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator not the standard of care (P<0.001) to be more significant obstacles to increased implementation of telestroke than SSs. However, SSs found increased personal work to be a greater barrier than EPs (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SSs and EPs report positive beliefs regarding telestroke; however, perceived obstacles exist to implementation. Differences between barriers perceived by EPs and SSs need to be addressed to enhance acute ischemic stroke treatment.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Telestroke has been effective in the management of acute ischemic stroke. This study characterizes and compares stroke specialist (SS) and emergency physician (EP) perceptions of telestroke and identifies barriers preventing increased implementation. METHODS: A survey was developed and distributed nationwide to 382 SSs through an online survey system and in paper form to 226 EPs attending the 2008 American College of Emergency Physicians national conference. RESULTS:Stroke specialists perceived themselves to be more knowledgeable about telemedicine and telestroke (P<0.001 and P=0.010, respectively). A large majority of physicians in both specialties either strongly agreed or agreed that telestroke will reduce geographical differences in stroke management and that it is superior to telephone consultation. EPs perceived patient preference (P<0.001), recombinant tissue plasminogen activator side effects (P<0.001), level of technology (P=0.005), and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator not the standard of care (P<0.001) to be more significant obstacles to increased implementation of telestroke than SSs. However, SSs found increased personal work to be a greater barrier than EPs (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SSs and EPs report positive beliefs regarding telestroke; however, perceived obstacles exist to implementation. Differences between barriers perceived by EPs and SSs need to be addressed to enhance acute ischemic stroke treatment.
Authors: Phoebe Lindsey Barton; Angela G Brega; Patricia A Devore; Keith Mueller; Marsha J Paulich; Natasha R Floersch; Glenn K Goodrich; Sylvia G Talkington; Jeff Bontrager; Bill Grigsby; Carol Hrincevich; Susannah Neal; Jeff L Loker; Tesfa M Araya; Rachael E Bennett; Neil Krohn; Jim Grigsby Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: David C Hess; Samuel Wang; Hartmut Gross; Fenwick T Nichols; Christiana E Hall; Robert J Adams Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Bart M Demaerschalk; Madeline L Miley; Terri-Ellen J Kiernan; Bentley J Bobrow; Doren A Corday; Kay E Wellik; Maria I Aguilar; Timothy J Ingall; David W Dodick; Karina Brazdys; Tiffany C Koch; Michael P Ward; Phillip C Richemont Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2009 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Jeffrey A Switzer; Christiana Hall; Hartmut Gross; Jennifer Waller; Fenwick T Nichols; Sam Wang; Robert J Adams; David C Hess Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Christopher M Shea; Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Kea Turner; Steve North; Kristin L Reiter Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Lawrence R Wechsler; Jack W Tsao; Steven R Levine; Rebecca J Swain-Eng; Robert J Adams; Bart M Demaerschalk; David C Hess; Elena Moro; Lee H Schwamm; Steve Steffensen; Barney J Stern; Steven J Zuckerman; Pratik Bhattacharya; Larry E Davis; Ilana R Yurkiewicz; Aimee L Alphonso Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Karen C Albright; Sheryl Martin-Schild; H Jeremy Bockholt; George Howard; Andrei Alexandrov; Anne Alexandrov; M Rick Sline; James C Grotta; Sean I Savitz Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Extra Date: 2011-11-05
Authors: Beverley French; Elaine Day; Caroline Watkins; Alison McLoughlin; Jane Fitzgerald; Michael Leathley; Paul Davies; Hedley Emsley; Gary Ford; Damian Jenkinson; Carl May; Mark O'Donnell; Christopher Price; Christopher Sutton; Catherine Lightbody Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 2.796