RATIONALE: Although in patients with diffuse bronchiectasis (DB) and a normal sweat test the presence of one mutation in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene is frequently observed, its pathogenic role in the development of DB remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between CFTR heterozygosity and CFTR protein dysfunction in the airways of patients with DB. METHODS: Nasal potential difference was measured in 122 patients with DB of unknown origin and with a normal sweat test (Cl(-) < 60 mmol/L). They were classified according to the presence of CFTR mutations: zero (85 patients), one (22 patients), or two mutations (15 patients). Control groups comprised 26 healthy subjects, 38 obligate heterozygotes for CFTR, and 92 patients with classic cystic fibrosis (CF) with an abnormal sweat test (Cl(-) > or = 60 mmol/L). Patients classified as mild-CF were carrying at least one mild mutation and patients classified as severe-CF were homozygous for the F508del mutation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was a continuum of airway CFTR dysfunction in the study population as shown by nasal potential difference measurements, ranging from normal values in healthy subjects, to intermediate values in subjects with DB, to highly abnormal values in subjects classified as severe-CF. This continuum of airway CFTR dysfunction was thus strongly associated with defects in the CFTR gene. Moreover, among patients with DB, a similar continuum in intermediate nasal potential difference was identified that was associated with the bearing of zero, one, or two CFTR mutations. These electrophysiological phenotypes and CFTR genotypes were also associated with the clinical phenotype, as shown by the frequency of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa bronchial colonization. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the hypothesis that a unique CFTR mutation may have pathogenic consequences in patients with DB.
RATIONALE: Although in patients with diffuse bronchiectasis (DB) and a normal sweat test the presence of one mutation in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene is frequently observed, its pathogenic role in the development of DB remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between CFTR heterozygosity and CFTRprotein dysfunction in the airways of patients with DB. METHODS: Nasal potential difference was measured in 122 patients with DB of unknown origin and with a normal sweat test (Cl(-) < 60 mmol/L). They were classified according to the presence of CFTR mutations: zero (85 patients), one (22 patients), or two mutations (15 patients). Control groups comprised 26 healthy subjects, 38 obligate heterozygotes for CFTR, and 92 patients with classic cystic fibrosis (CF) with an abnormal sweat test (Cl(-) > or = 60 mmol/L). Patients classified as mild-CF were carrying at least one mild mutation and patients classified as severe-CF were homozygous for the F508del mutation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was a continuum of airway CFTR dysfunction in the study population as shown by nasal potential difference measurements, ranging from normal values in healthy subjects, to intermediate values in subjects with DB, to highly abnormal values in subjects classified as severe-CF. This continuum of airway CFTR dysfunction was thus strongly associated with defects in the CFTR gene. Moreover, among patients with DB, a similar continuum in intermediate nasal potential difference was identified that was associated with the bearing of zero, one, or two CFTR mutations. These electrophysiological phenotypes and CFTR genotypes were also associated with the clinical phenotype, as shown by the frequency of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa bronchial colonization. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the hypothesis that a unique CFTR mutation may have pathogenic consequences in patients with DB.
Authors: Kathryn A Ramsey; Alice C H Chen; Giorgia Radicioni; Rohan Lourie; Megan Martin; Amy Broomfield; Yong H Sheng; Sumaira Z Hasnain; Graham Radford-Smith; Lisa A Simms; Lucy Burr; David J Thornton; Simon D Bowler; Stephanie Livengood; Agathe Ceppe; Michael R Knowles; Peadar G Noone; Scott H Donaldson; David B Hill; Camille Ehre; Brian Button; Neil E Alexis; Mehmet Kesimer; Richard C Boucher; Michael A McGuckin Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-03-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Elenara da Fonseca Andrade Procianoy; Fernando Antônio de Abreu E Silva; Paulo José Cauduro Maróstica; Paul M Quinton Journal: Lung Date: 2019-11-16 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: George M Solomon; Inez Bronsveld; Kathryn Hayes; Michael Wilschanski; Paola Melotti; Steven M Rowe; Isabelle Sermet-Gaudelus Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: S Vamsee Raju; Patricia L Jackson; Clifford A Courville; Carmel M McNicholas; Peter A Sloane; Gina Sabbatini; Sherry Tidwell; Li Ping Tang; Bo Liu; James A Fortenberry; Caleb W Jones; Jeremy A Boydston; J P Clancy; Larry E Bowen; Frank J Accurso; J Edwin Blalock; Mark T Dransfield; Steven M Rowe Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Giulia Bonaiti; Alberto Pesci; Almerico Marruchella; Giuseppe Lapadula; Andrea Gori; Stefano Aliberti Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-05-27 Impact factor: 3.411