Literature DB >> 20167825

Healthy universities--time for action: a qualitative research study exploring the potential for a national programme.

Mark Dooris1, Sharon Doherty.   

Abstract

Despite the absence of national or international steers, there is within England growing interest in the Healthy University approach. This article introduces Healthy Universities; reports on a qualitative study exploring the potential for a national programme contributing to health, well-being and sustainable development; and concludes with reflections and recommendations. The study used questionnaires and interviews with key informants from English higher education institutions and national stakeholder organizations. The findings confirmed that higher education offers significant potential to impact positively on the health and well-being of students, staff and wider communities through education, research, knowledge exchange and institutional practice. There was strong support for extending the healthy settings approach beyond schools and further education, through a National Healthy Higher Education Programme that provides a whole system Healthy University Framework. Informants argued that although there are important public health drivers, it will also be necessary to show how a Healthy Universities can help achieve core business objectives and contribute to related agendas such as sustainability. Two models were discussed: an accreditation scheme with externally assessed standardized achievement criteria; and a flexible and light-touch framework focusing on change-related processes and utilizing self-assessment. While highlighting the appeal of league tables, many informants feared that a top-down approach could backfire, generating resistance and resulting in minimal compliance. In contrast, the majority felt that a process-focused aspirational model would be more likely to win hearts and minds and facilitate system-level change. Key recommendations relate to national programme development, research and evaluation and international collaboration and networking.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20167825     DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daq015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  7 in total

1.  Meal preparation and consumption before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: The relationship with cooking skills of Brazilian university students.

Authors:  Talissa Dezanetti; Ricardo Teixeira Quinaud; Martin Caraher; Manuela Mika Jomori
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.016

2.  Psychological distress and coping amongst higher education students: a mixed method enquiry.

Authors:  Christine Deasy; Barry Coughlan; Julie Pironom; Didier Jourdan; Patricia Mannix-McNamara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact.

Authors:  Mark Dooris; Alan Farrier; Sharon Doherty; Maxine Holt; Robert Monk; Susan Powell
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.483

4.  Health-promoting factors in higher education for a sustainable working life - protocol for a multicenter longitudinal study.

Authors:  U Lindmark; I Ahlstrand; A Ekman; L Berg; L Hedén; J Källstrand; M Larsson; H Nunstedt; L Oxelmark; S Pennbrant; A Sundler; I Larsson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Healthcare Communication Role in the Detection of Unhealthy Behavior in University Students.

Authors:  Razan Alarnous; Aida Albasalah; Samar Alshawwa
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 2.682

6.  Promoting Students' Health at University: Key Stakeholders, Cooperation, and Network Development.

Authors:  Philip Bachert; Hagen Wäsche; Felix Albrecht; Claudia Hildebrand; Alexa Maria Kunz; Alexander Woll
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-30

Review 7.  The youth sports club as a health-promoting setting: an integrative review of research.

Authors:  Susanna Geidne; Mikael Quennerstedt; Charli Eriksson
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.021

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.