Literature DB >> 20167583

Influence of steep Trendelenburg position and CO(2) pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy.

A F Kalmar1, L Foubert, J F A Hendrickx, A Mottrie, A Absalom, E P Mortier, M M R F Struys.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The steep (40 degrees ) Trendelenburg position optimizes surgical exposure during robotic prostatectomy. The goal of the current study was to investigate the combined effect of this position and CO(2) pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during these procedures.
METHODS: Physiological data were recorded during the whole surgical procedure in 31 consecutive patients who underwent robotic endoscopic radical prostatectomy under general anaesthesia. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, Sp(o(2)), Pe'(co(2)), P(Plat), tidal volume, compliance, and minute ventilation were monitored and recorded. Arterial samples were obtained to determine the arterial-to-end-tidal CO(2) tension gradient. Continuous regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (Sct(o(2))) was determined by near-infrared spectroscopy.
RESULTS: Although patients were in the Trendelenburg position, all variables investigated remained within a clinically acceptable range. Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) decreased from 77 mm Hg at baseline to 71 mm Hg (P=0.07), and Sct(o(2)) increased from 70% to 73% (P<0.001). Pe'(co(2)) increased from 4.12 to 4.79 kPa (P<0.001) and the arterial-to-Pe'(co(2)) tension difference increased from 1.06 kPa in the normal position to a maximum of 1.41 kPa (P<0.001) after 2 h in the Trendelenburg position.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of the prolonged steep Trendelenburg position and CO(2) pneumoperitoneum was well tolerated. Haemodynamic and pulmonary variables remained within safe limits. Regional cerebral oxygenation was well preserved and CPP remained within the limits between which cerebral blood flow is usually considered to be maintained by cerebral autoregulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20167583     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  56 in total

Review 1.  Anesthetic considerations for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Jeong Rim Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-01-28

2.  Comparison of anesthetic management and outcomes of robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Terrence L Trentman; Sharon L Fassett; Dustin McGirr; Brad Anderson; Yu-Hui H Chang; Rafael Nunez Nateras; Erik P Castle; David M Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-09-22

Review 3.  Anesthetic considerations in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Alan D Kaye; Nalini Vadivelu; Nitin Ahuja; Sukanya Mitra; Dan Silasi; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2013

4.  Low Tidal Volume Positive End-Expiratory Pressure versus High Tidal Volume Zero-Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Postoperative Pulmonary Functions in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Murat Haliloglu; Beliz Bilgili; Mehtap Ozdemir; Tumay Umuroglu; Nurten Bakan
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 5.  [Cardiorespiratory effects of perioperative positioning techniques].

Authors:  C Zeuzem-Lampert; P Groene; V Brummer; K Hofmann-Kiefer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Effects of dexmedetomidine on anesthesia recovery period and postoperative cognitive function of patients after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Lingling Ding; Hong Zhang; Weidong Mi; Tao Wang; Yan He; Xu Zhang; Xin Ma; Hongzhao Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

7.  Bilateral otorrhagia: a rare complication of laparoscopic abdominopelvic surgery.

Authors:  Alfred Bentsi Addison; Esther Inarra; Simon Watts
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-12-19

8.  Operative and anesthetic outcomes in endometrial cancer staging via three minimally invasive methods.

Authors:  Nicole D Fleming; Allison E Axtell; Scott E Lentz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-11-01

Review 9.  Anesthetic Challenges in Robotic-assisted Urologic Surgery.

Authors:  Richard L Hsu; Alan D Kaye; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

10.  Postoperative pain and neuromuscular complications associated with patient positioning after robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective non-placebo and non-randomized study.

Authors:  Elif Gezginci; Orkunt Ozkaptan; Serdar Yalcin; Yigit Akin; Jens Rassweiler; Ali Serdar Gozen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.