| Literature DB >> 20167353 |
Xiaoke Hu1, Sean Cook, Peng Wang, Huey-min Hwang, Xi Liu, Quinton L Williams.
Abstract
In this study, we used a systematic approach to study and compare the in vitro cytotoxicity of selected engineered carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to test cell lines including human skin keratinocytes, lung cells and lymphocytes. Results of fluorescein diacetate (FDA) uptake in T4 lymphocyte A3 cells indicated cytotoxicity caused by single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) at concentrations of 2, 5 and 10ppm. At 2ppm, the SWCNT treatment group retained 71.3% viability compared to the PBS control group. At 10ppm, cellular viability further decreased to 56.5% of the PBS control group. In the skin keratinocyte HaCaT cells and lung MSTO-211H cells, the SWCNT did not demonstrate any cytotoxicity at concentrations of 2 and 5ppm but slightly inhibited HaCaT cells and caused significant toxicity to MSTO-211H cells at 10ppm. Multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) testing showed significant cytotoxicity to A3 cells in a dose-dependent manner. At 10ppm the viability of the cells decreased to 89.1% compared to the PBS control. In MSTO-211H cells, MWCNT caused significant toxicity at concentrations of 2ppm and higher. By comparison, HaCaT cells were inhibited significantly only at 10ppm. Overall, the test CNTs inhibited cellular viabilities in a concentration, cell type, and CNT type-dependent pattern. The viabilities of the MWCNT-impacted cells are higher than the corresponding SWCNT groups. We speculate that on a per volume basis, the greater availability of defects and contaminants for cellular interaction may contribute to the higher cytotoxicity of SWCNT in this study. The interaction between the SWCNTs and A3 lymphocytes was also observed by scanning electron microscopy. The mechanism for causing cell death in this study was attributed to apoptosis and necrosis after physical penetration by CNTs and oxidative stress via formation of reactive oxygen species.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20167353 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.01.035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 7.963